Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Taj Mahal in March 2004

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Taj Mahal[edit]

The Taj Mahal

Used in many articles, including India and Taj Mahal. FP image from the Commons. It really has striking colors, highlighting how nice the Taj Mahal looks. --AllyUnion (talk) 10:31, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • Nominate and support. - AllyUnion (talk) 10:31, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is a very famous image: perhaps featured pictures should be about bringing new images to light? Jdhowens90 10:28, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    • The criteria don't mention anything about that. It illustrates the article well, and is certainly striking. Support. Raven4x4x 08:35, September 4, 2005 (UTC)
      • I do agree with Jdhowens90; It seems rather cliche. -Haon 12:44, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Yes, perfect. Thanks for the reminder, time for a vindaloo. :) --Deglr6328 02:53, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. James F. (talk) 13:01, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Beautiful. Enochlau 13:06, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Asport. — BRIAN0918 • 2005-09-4 17:14
  • Support -- TomStar81 22:43, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, as cliché as it may be. It's a stunning image that adds lots to the Taj Mahal article. - Mgm|(talk) 09:06, September 5, 2005 (UTC)
  • Support. cliché--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 04:24, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Good image, does it's job perfectly --Fir0002 07:35, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
  • Support. I think Taj Mahal Badalandabad from Van Wilder would vote support too. - Darwinek 11:33, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. - MPF 16:36, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - have seen similar pictures by the dozends, but I am still very impressed by the building. -- Chris 73 Talk 07:41, September 9, 2005 (UTC)
  • Support, despite the fact that there are probably hundreds of uploaded picture of the Taj Mahal this is a great photo and works well in the article. Jtkiefer T | @ | C ----- 19:46, September 10, 2005 (UTC)
  • Neutral Well taken, but me & every other visitor has this exact photo, maybe a photo that captures it in a different way. I dont know how you can photograph this any other way, but I'd like to see it done. --User:Rakkar
  • Support =Nichalp «Talk»= 09:04, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Off-centre. Mark1 03:47, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Would support if the view had been from the centre. --Rebroad 17:25, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support- beautiful. As some people think of the assymetricality (if that's not a word, it should be) as a bad thing, I think that is what makes the picture great. Hojimachong 02:38, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Image:Taj Mahal in March 2004.jpg ~ Veledan • Talk + new 00:06, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/Taj_Mahal_in_March_2004&oldid=1138153302"