Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Castle Neuschwanstein.jpg

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Castle Neuschwanstein [edit]

Castle Neuschwanstein at Schwangau, Bavaria, Germany
sharpened

Amazing photograph that is currently a Featured Picture on Commons. Illustrates Neuschwanstein.

  • Nominate and support. - BRIAN0918 04:12, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. The photo has great lighting, focus, and resolution. Also, there's not a part of it that has a problem. Great photo. --JPM 05:34, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - good pic, not somewhat exceptional, but fits FP requirements. Renata3 05:38, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. I couldn't say it better than JPM. Wonderful shot. Raven4x4x 05:40, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. As simple as that. --Janke | Talk 16:21, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. It may be technically a great shot, but visually, it does nothing for me. Uninteresting and bland. Zafiroblue05 18:34, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. I love it! I don't see why Zafiroblue05 calls this bland. - Cuivienen 20:49, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Heh, I don't get a lot of things that happen on this page. ;) This picture is just a building on a hill - a nice building, but certainly not spectacular, certainly not out of the ordinary in any way, and it gets supported nearly unanimously. (And there is a more interesting and stunning image on the same page.) At the same time, an image like the Clyde Dam picture - sparse yet beautiful with an impressive and surprising use of color, which this image lacks - is nearly unanimously opposed. I guess everyone has their differing personal opinions, lol. :) Zafiroblue05 04:31, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. I like it. Alr 21:44, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Nicely framed and appealingly crisp. Camerafiend 01:43, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. I don't think it's as clear as the others make out above when viewed at full res. It's ordinary. enochlau (talk) 08:45, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Your right, it isn't perfectly clear at full resolution, but I only really care about what it looks like when it's resized to fit my screen. Raven4x4x 11:36, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Neutralitytalk 00:38, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • ( + ) Support Either Version. I love that castle, and this is a pretty good photo. An ideal version IMO would be a bit more atmospheric like this one or this one, but this will do --Fir0002 07:50, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose doesn't do anything for me. --Dschwen 12:45, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support either version. drumguy8800 - speak? 05:07, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Flcelloguy (A note?) 23:10, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Natürlich. --Darwinek 23:13, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. I like it. Eyesclosed 19:57, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Not really exciting, and a petty that part of the skyline of the castle is not against the air.--Treffer 21:41, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    User's 5th edit.
  • Support Beautyful pic! Andrew18 @ 23:29, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Sparks the imagination. Good image quality and composition. Zarniwoot 03:13, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Image:Castle Neuschwanstein.jpg Raven4x4x 04:50, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/Castle_Neuschwanstein.jpg&oldid=1148860012"