Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of number-one Billboard Top Latin Albums of 1996, 1997 and 1998/archive1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by User:Scorpion0422 23:27, 30 December 2008 [1].

List of number-one Billboard Top Latin Albums of 1996, 1997 and 1998[edit]

I am submiting this merged list for the Top Latin Albums of 1996, 1997 and 1998, I think is ready to achieve FL status. Jaespinoza (talk) 02:20, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from SRX

Comments

  • This album became the first to peak at number one on three diferent calendar years (1995 – 1997); while a best-of collection by the late singer, entitled Siempre Selena, also reached the first spot of the chart for two weeks. - split the sentences, they are not related in anyway and makes it confusing when read.
  • The self-titled debut album by Enrique Iglesias also hit the top spot of the chart for 11 weeks and won the Grammy Award for Best Latin Pop Album over albums recorded by singers José Feliciano, Vikki Carr, Marco Antonio Solís and Luis Miguel,[2] who also peaked at number one for the second time on his career with Nada Es Igual.... - hit-->reached, and remove the other names minus Luis Miguel because they make the second part of the sentence confusing.--SRX 22:06, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Support - comments were resolved to comply with WP:WIAFL.--SRX 21:01, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

    • Comments

    • Idea: how about wording it "of 1996-1998"? Circeus (talk) 05:21, 14 December 2008 (UTC). I like it the way it is, but I am open to suggestions, Jaespinoza (talk) 18:20, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Comment Where are the references for the tables? Dabomb87 (talk) 00:10, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Answer: I have all the references, but they are in total 156, should I put them? I do not want to overcite. Jaespinoza (talk) 17:54, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    You might provide a general link to a page where readers can easily access each individual week's chartings, and provide instructions on what to do. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:44, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    FIXED! Jaespinoza (talk) 01:56, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    It says "select the date". Where and how do you "select the date" (is it a link, where is the link)? Dabomb87 (talk) 02:45, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    FIXED I added a link to the charts and expanded the instructions, Jaespinoza (talk) 18:16, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    I am still having trouble accessing the charts. Could you provide a link on this FLC to a web page with the number-one album information from any week? Dabomb87 (talk) 16:20, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    It's not a requirement for FL, but are there any WikiProjects the page falls under the scope of? Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 06:29, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    • I noticed the format of the three tables in this list are different from the already featured lists of individual years. The tables here have "Chart date", "Album", "Artist", and "Weeks at number one" headers, but the tables for the individual years have "Issue Date", "Album", "Artist", and Reference" columns. They aren't sortable either. Also, the previous page of merged year charts has the same columns as this one, but arranged in a different order, and also are not sortable. Why was the decision made to initially reformat the tables for these merged pages, and then again for this particular one, making both pages with merged lists different? If each year were on individual pages, what format would they be in? Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 03:59, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • On my first FL list the had this headers, "Issue date", "Album", "Artist" and "Reference", but on another review some user told me to change the "Issue date" to "Chart date", which is more acurate, but I forgot to change it on every list. The reason for the diferences between this list and the list for 1993, 1994 and 1995, is because The Rambling Man asked me to change this list (on his review above). The other featured lists do not sort because the sort did not work due to the rowspan. Jaespinoza (talk) 23:16, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/List_of_number-one_Billboard_Top_Latin_Albums_of_1996,_1997_and_1998/archive1&oldid=1138487054"