Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Lagaan/archive2

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 02:24, 2 November 2015 [1].

---

List of accolades received by Lagaan

List of accolades received by Lagaan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Lagaan/archive1
• Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Lagaan/archive2

Nominator(s): Yashthepunisher (talk) 15:10, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Lagaan is one of the most influential film ever produced by Indian cinema. It won several awards and nomination. I am nominating this for featured list because I feel the list meets the criteria and provides a sourced and well-written listing of it's award list. All kind of comments are welcomed. Yashthepunisher (talk) 15:10, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Resolved comments from Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:13, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Comments from Pavanjandhyala "and grossed over ₹1.3 billion (US$20 million) worldwide, making it a box office success" can be rephrased as and was commercially successful grossing over ₹1.3 billion (US$20 million) globally/worldwide. "becoming the third Hindi-language film to be nominated in the category after" — here you can use third Indian Hindi film. Wikilink Bosnian Is there a reliable source stating that No Man's Land won the Academy Award? If yes, add it. "At the 49th National Film Awards, the film won a total of eight awards, including Best Popular Film Providing Wholesome Entertainment." — including the "It also won eight awards at the 47th Filmfare Awards, including Best Film, Best Director and..." — including the ones for. Ditto for Screen Awards. Break the third paragraph into two, the fourth should start from Channel 4. Thank you for your comments Pavan, I have resolved all of them; except for the fourth one. Since the source in the table already mentions the winners and nominees of the academy awards, it feels unnecessary to add another one in the lead. Yashthepunisher (talk) 03:29, 13 October 2015 (UTC) Well, if that is the case, do you require to name the winner too? Wouldn't it divert the focus Yash? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:05, 13 October 2015 (UTC) Removed. Yashthepunisher (talk) 12:54, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Support. Nice job. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:13, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Resolved comments from Relentlessly (talk) 13:02, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Comments from Relentlessly Looks like a decent list, but there are significant problems with prose. Yashpal Sharma, Raghubir Yadav, British actors Rachel Shelley and Paul Blackthorne play supporting roles This doesn't make sense. The words "British actors" make the sentence ungrammatical and, to my mind, add little useful meaning. Set in the Victorian period of India's colonial British Raj, Lagaan revolves around a small village whose inhabitants, oppressed by high taxes, find themselves challenged by an arrogant officer in a Cricket match, as a wager to avoid the taxes. This is not an elegant sentence. I suggest Lagaan is set in India in 1893, during the British Raj. The film tells the story of a small village whose inhabitants are oppressed by high taxes. They are challenged to a cricket match by an arrogant officer as a wager to avoid the taxes. Made on a budget of ₹250 million (US$3.1 million), Lagaan was released on 15 June 2001, and was commercially successful grossing over ₹1.3 billion (US$16 million) globally. Again this is inelegant phrasing; it's two related facts with an unrelated fact in the middle. Try Lagaan was released on 15 June 2001. It was made on a budget of ₹250 million (US$3.1 million) and was commercially successful: it grossed over ₹1.3 billion (US$16 million) globally. Can you explain why we need a semicolon after successful? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:48, 13 October 2015 (UTC) It's a colon, needed because there are two separate independent clauses. You could make the second one a subordinate clause ("was commercially successful, grossing over..."). This is common and you do it a lot. I think, however, it makes the sentence harder to understand. To make your writing as clear as possible, I suggest you minimise your use of subordinate clauses. Relentlessly (talk) 12:01, 13 October 2015 (UTC) Thanks. That was helpful. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:05, 13 October 2015 (UTC) The film garnered awards and nominations in several categories, in both India and international; with particular praise for its direction, performances and landscapes. This is another poor bit of phrasing. First "garner" is journalese (particularly prominent in Indian film articles, for some reason). Second, "in international" doesn't make sense. Finally, the subclause needs a comma not a semicolon. The film received nominations and awards in several categories both in India and internationally. There was particular praise for its direction, performances and landscapes. You may also consider "acting" rather than "performances". But it lost to the Bosnian film No Man's Land. Don't start sentences with "but" in encyclopaedia articles. At the 49th National Film Awards Can you clarify that these are Indian national awards? including the ones for Best Film, Best Director and Best Story for Gowariker and Best Actor for Khan This could be better phrased. including the Best Film, Best Director and Best Story awards for Gowariker and the Best Actor award for Khan I feel that mentioning "the ones for" would make the sentence more clear. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:48, 13 October 2015 (UTC) I'm not going to argue this with you, but I don't think "the ones for" is attractive English. YMMV, of course: feel free to disregard if you like. Relentlessly (talk) 12:01, 13 October 2015 (UTC) Nothing like that. I wanted to clarify as it would help both me (in my future endeavours) as well as this FLC's nominator. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:05, 13 October 2015 (UTC) Finally, a list comment. There is no bottom border on the date column. I think this is because you have mis-matched rowspan numbers. Relentlessly (talk) 09:26, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Relentlessly, I think all of your comments has been resolved. Yashthepunisher (talk) 12:54, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

I agree. Support. Relentlessly (talk) 13:02, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Resolved comments from Frankie talk

Could you write the translation of the film's title just like here. "Lagaan is set in India in 1893, during the British Raj." – did we forget to italicize the title of the film? "and was commercially successful:" is simply redundant as the worldwide gross and budget are already written. And since the amount of the gross is greater than budget, it automatically indicates that the film was a commercial success. The two last sentences of the second para can be merged. "Lagaan was nominated for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film at the 74th Academy Awards" The third sentence of third paragraph has too many "awards". The third paragraph has used the word "including" four times. Link CNN-IBN in reference 14. De-italicize Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences in source 15. Reference 28 does not list all of the recipients and nominees added in the list. Quite a few WP:DASH violations in the titles of references. -- Frankie talk 14:57, 15 October 2015 (UTC) Thank you for you comments FrB.TG, all your comments has been resolved. But, i can't find a single reliable source that lists all the winners and nominees for the Screen awards. Yashthepunisher (talk) 17:16, 15 October 2015 (UTC) The format of this reference might help you. -- Frankie talk 11:27, 16 October 2015 (UTC) Done. Yashthepunisher (talk) 12:28, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

• Support – my craps are above. -- Frankie _talk 08:30, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Resolved comments from - Vivvt (Talk) 08:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Comments by Vivvt land tax --> Land Tax Done For singers and lyricist, mention the song(s) Done For National Film Awards, Udit Narayan won the award for two songs. That needs a mention in the note but not in the award list. You can use footnotes/explanatory notes. Done. Yashthepunisher (talk) 15:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC) For NatFilm Festival, the source mentions the closing ceremony was held on 14th April 2002. Corrected 5 April is not needed. Removed. Yashthepunisher (talk) 15:05, 17 October 2015 (UTC) Sorting seems off: Use {{dts}} for dates and {{sortname}} for names. I have based this list on other indian film FL's , and they don't have such sorts. I havent followed any of the indian film FLs but if they are doing this way, then they are doing it wrong way. But you can take a look at Hollywood FLs. - Vivvt (Talk) 14:44, 17 October 2015 (UTC) Vivvt, i have added the infobox but the dts and name sort don't seem really important to me. For instance this and this list have the same kind of sorts as Lagaan's list. Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:57, 18 October 2015 (UTC) Quoting Rambling man from the discussion here..."To sort names, use the {{sortname}} template, not the {{sort}} template." - Vivvt (Talk) 04:06, 20 October 2015 (UTC) Vivvt, I have added the sortname templates, should i also add the dts ones as well?. Yashthepunisher (talk) 12:20, 20 October 2015 (UTC) That would be good. Also, sortname is only needed for the first name in the column. Other entries can stay as normal wikilinks. - Vivvt (Talk) 07:06, 21 October 2015 (UTC) Added dts sort for dates. Can you please elaborate the sortname issue? The names should be wikilinked everytime they are mentioned in the list. With out sorts, they won't be wikilinked. Yashthepunisher (talk) 12:13, 21 October 2015 (UTC) You need to use sortname only for the first name in the given column. e.g. if its A, B, and C, You need to use sortname only for A. - Vivvt (Talk) 14:24, 21 October 2015 (UTC) Then how B and C will get wikilinked? Sorry i can't understand, but if you can please perform the edit yourself. Yashthepunisher (talk) 16:18, 21 October 2015 (UTC) "becoming the third Indian Hindi film" --> Hindi not required Removed "At the Screen Awards," --> mention ceremony plus consider rephrasing for the sentence. Done. Screen Awards --> 8th Screen Awards You can use "the film" and "Lagaan" interchangeably than only using "it". - Vivvt (Talk) 09:24, 17 October 2015 (UTC) Removed and replaced on two instances, but the rest looks fine to me coz the word "it" goes with the flow of the sentence. Yashthepunisher (talk) 14:18, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 02:39, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.