The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: 10 days, 4 support, 0 oppose. Tompw (talk) (review) 14:07, 14 July 2007 (UTC)Promote. Tompw (talk) (review) 14:07, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I believe this list fulfills the criteria as well as being consistant with the fourotherfeaturedlists covering different areas. Self nomination as I have done most of the recent changes. Thanks Suicidalhamster 15:17, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maintains the high standard. Good work. Colin°Talk 19:19, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Data well presented and references provided (as PDF files) for all sites. --Kalyan 06:20, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pretty straightforward indeed. I'd recommend linking the master list under a "See also" section, though. that's the usual way to do it. Circeus 04:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
