Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Grammy Award for Best Female R&B Vocal Performance/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 14:06, 29 January 2012 [1].
Grammy Award for Best Female R&B Vocal Performance[edit]
Grammy Award for Best Female R&B Vocal Performance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets the criteria for an FL. The lists follows the format of other Grammy FLs. Thanks in advance to all the reviewers! Novice7 (talk) 06:06, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: An excellent list -- well done! I would recommend listing artists in the Nominees column in alphabetical order by last name (in other words, just rearrange the order so that Gladys Knight is listed before Nina Simone). I would support this list if this first concern is addressed and assuming all other reviewers' concerns are addressed. Also, I would double check that there aren't any re-directs due to MoS inconsistencies. Keep up the great work! --Another Believer (Talk) 19:54, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Thanks. (nominator has retired and has asked fellow editors to watch his nominations) —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 22:55, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (Talk) 20:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments –
|
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 08:25, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 09:39, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
Support Everything looks in order NapHit (talk) 22:25, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comments I have read the article. It is very good but there are some issues with the references. I will be posting them soon. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 08:25, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- FN 7: Unlink work and publisher
- FN 17 & 18: Is that publisher correct?
- FN 22: Unlink work and publisher
- FN 39: Link the publisher
- FN 42: Check the formatting
- FN 43:Unlink the publisher
- FN 44:Use {{cite news}}
Jivesh1205 (Talk) 08:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- All done. Thanks for reviewing! Ryōga Hibiki (talk) 11:40, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Fantastic work. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 11:47, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you. Ryōga Hibiki (talk) 12:09, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- You are welcome. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:10, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - with three comments:
- Are the flags necessary?
- In fact, is the "Nationality" column necessary? Until and unless someone from another country wins the Grammy, it seems redundant.
- Is the smaller font size in the "Nominees" column necessary? And/or should those be a bullet list, or simply the nominees (each on a line)?
-- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 18:55, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, per request on talk page: If consensus shows a preference for the removal of the Nationality column for lists where only one nation is represented, there may be additional Grammy-related FLs needing to be updated. I always included the Nationality column for consistency among Grammy lists, but I don't feel strongly about including the column if only one nation is represented (not necessarily the case if multiple countries are represented). I will say, however, that including a sentence in the lead about all winners being American is including a fact that is not represented in the content below. Feel free to use the Grammy Awards task force talk page is further discussion is necessary. --Another Believer (Talk) 16:02, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with Another Believer. If I remove the column, the readers cannot verify the information about the winners being Americans. I've followed the format of other Grammy FLs here. Ryōga Hibiki (talk • contribs) 07:23, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- "a ceremony
that wasestablished in 1958" - The image captions read somewhat monotonous. Any chance you could add some variety?
- Most images require alt text.
- Usage of File:Nobel Peace Prize Concert 2008 Diana Ross1 cropped.jpg might be in violation of the license. Should "Photo: Harry Wad" be included in the caption? Or is the link to the File: page enough? I'd appreciate it, if somebody would enlighten me on the matter.
Goodraise 04:29, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- All done. Ryōga Hibiki (talk • contribs) 07:23, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments from Legolas
- Agree with Goodraise above, about the image captions and ALT. Some variety is needed I believe.
- Do we have any other Grammy trophy image? That one in the infobox is just so so passe.
- Red links can be there, no? They are notable enough with their Grammy win.
These are just from me. — Legolas (talk2me) 13:14, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Added alt and fixed captions. As for the infobox image, I'm afraid we don't have another one of the same quality. The available ones are just drawings. Ryōga Hibiki (talk • contribs) 07:23, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It is not clear if this award is for R&B or Contemporary R&B songs, as both genres are very different from each other.--♫GoP♫TCN 21:13, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It was awarded for rhythm and blues songs. Actually, the award is given for the artists' vocal performance. Ryōga Hibiki (talk • contribs) 07:23, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.