Wikipedia:Featured article review/Doctor Who missing episodes/archive2

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 1:23, 15 May 2021 (UTC) [1].

Doctor Who missing episodes[edit]

Notified: Hammersfan, Some Dude from North Carolina, Angmering, Kelvin 101, WP Doctor Who, WP Television, WP England, WP BBC, DrKay in August 2019 and me in March

Review section[edit]

This FA, which hasn't been reviewed since 2007, has a litany of issues - uncited text, questionable web sources, and an accumulation of crufty tables. DrKay raised concerns on the talk page way back in 2019, but they remain largely unaddressed. Did not notify top editor, as they are an IP who has not edited this article since 2015, so I think the chances of a notification reaching the right person are slim. Hog Farm _Talk 01:55, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move to FARC - Major issues, no engagement. Hog Farm _Talk 02:19, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Move to FARC no significant edits since HF placed their notice on the talk page. Z1720 (talk) 14:08, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FARC section[edit]

Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and organization. Nikkimaria (talk) 16:50, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delist lots of unsourced content (t · c) buidhe 03:00, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delist significant issues. Was first noticed over 1.5 years ago, and there was plenty of page traffic between my second notice and taking this to FAR because of a RM. There just doens't seem to be any interest in cleaning this up. Hog Farm _Talk 03:17, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delist too much unsourced content for a GA, nevermind a FA... half of the tables are actually completely unsourced. Also, major issues with sourcing. RetiredDuke (talk) 12:55, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delist far too much unsourced content. Link20XX (talk) 01:04, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delist still no significant progress towards improving the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:46, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:23, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.