Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ubuntu Eee/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 18:18, 15 November 2008 [1].
Ubuntu Eee[edit]
I'm nominating this article for featured article Jon Blund (talk) 18:12, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - If this was an RfA, I'd say NOTNOW. But, article needs a lot of work before FA is even considered. D.M.N. (talk) 18:16, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - Perhaps this user neglected to read the featured article criteria? (Note: His username is the same as the developer's last name.) Awadewit (talk) 20:00, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - this is a timewaster. 280 words, nominator has 0 edits on en-Wikpedia. There are better uses for FAC time.Brianboulton (talk) 01:06, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose/Procedural close. This article is nowhere close to being comprehensive or well-written. - 131.211.151.245 (talk) 07:44, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - It would appear nominator does not understand the high quality of featured articles. Ravmi, please read up on WP:FA?, WP:RS, and put some long, hard work into this article before nominating again. Xclamation point 01:06, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Object stub. YellowMonkey (click here to choose Australia's next top model) 03:25, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose The above users who commented are right. This article consists of a few stubby paragraphs. It's not even good enough for a Start-Class article... Lady★Galaxy 04:48, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Please read the criteria--JackyCheung (talk) 05:57, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.