User talk:Xagg

Hi.

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited One-night stand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Sociopathy namespace

Hello, I am interested to build consensus for what should happen at the Sociopathy namespace. I noticed your participation in a recent discussion on the topic, so please feel free to visit Talk:Sociopathy if you are interested in further discussion. Thank you. C-PTSD (talk) 17:45, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

WP:Edit summaries

Xagg, will you consider using WP:Edit summaries more often so that editors easily know what you have added or otherwise changed? For example, you sometimes make several or more edits in an editing session and using a WP:Edit summary more often would mean that an editor doesn't necessarily have to check all or most of those edits to understand what you have done. Flyer22 (talk) 18:33, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Sure, I'll try to incorporate more edit summaries. A lot of the consecutive edits were minor (e.g. syntax) but, I agree, it's still beneficial to note so people don't have to check to see that.--Xagg (talk) 12:23, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. I very much appreciate your agreeing to incorporate more edit summaries, and others no doubt will as well. Flyer22 (talk) 12:51, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Discussion at Template_talk:Bullying#RfC:_Template_links

You are invited to join the discussion at Template_talk:Bullying#RfC:_Template_links. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 04:32, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Xagg. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)