Hello, Wuerzele2! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horsesIf you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 00:32, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Wuerzele2. You have new messages at I dream of horses's talk page. Message added 00:45, 3 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]
Hi Wuerzele2! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)
Hi, I want to discuss an aspect of bitcoin anonymity. Systems with non-public ledgers can be both non-anonymous, and privacy-preserving at the same time. (Note that there is a "Right to financial privacy act" guaranteeing financial privacy.) In case of bitcoin the situation is different: since all transactions are public, anonymity is the only means to preserve financial privacy. Everybody knowing the identity of bitcoin owners also knows the transactions they made. Seen from this angle, anonymity of owners is necessary, if the right to financial privacy shall be exercised. This aspect is mentioned in several sources, the question is whether it should be discussed in the article. It is worth mentioning that if regulators succeed to curb anonymity (and therefore, financial privacy) of bitcoin owners in a substantial way, bitcoin ceases to be viable as a currency, and the only remedy would be to upgrade the system to present a higher level of privacy. Ladislav Mecir (talk) 21:48, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ladislav, thank you for educating me on a non-anonymous, and privacy-preserving capacity, an excellent point. Please add this. I think it should go onto the virtual currency page. Of course it belongs on the bitcoin page just as well, but I started writing about virtual currency regulation there and kept the details on the virtual currency page. To keep the ever-swelling bitcoin page in bounds one could point to "further details see the virtual currency page".--Wuerzele2 (talk) 08:19, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
