User talk:Wiki Fugitive

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Indefinitely blocked[edit]

I have blocked you indefinitely for both block evasion and edits like this. You know this is unacceptable, but yet you did it anyway. We have no time for people that commit senseless personal attacks. --Deskana (talk) 20:30, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh c'mon, it was a joke - look right>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>well done 20:32, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So when am i allowed to have a new account ? look right>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>well done 20:41, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sorry for the edits, but i did try to make some good ones before you blocked me. How long will it take before i'm allowed a new account ? look right>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>well done 20:50, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You aren't permitted to set up a new account. See WP:SOCK. You were given multiple chances and decided to continue making inappropriate edits. You are done. --Yamla 21:05, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wiki Fugitive (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I wasn't given a chance to do the edits i proposed

Decline reason:

That's right because you went straight for vandalism. You knew better and showed that you could not be trusted to edit productively. — Yamla 21:03, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well, if i was unblocked in the first place i wouldnt have done the vandalism, it was just to prove a point. look right>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>well done 21:10, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disrupting Wikipedia to prove a point? You're putting your foot in it. --Deskana (talk) 21:15, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ok sorry, i didnt know about that rule, but seriously, if you guys had just let me do the edits i wanted to make in the other account, i would have just got on with it. By the way, are you saying i can never edit again with another account ? look right>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>well done 21:20, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thanks for answering the question, arsewipes look right>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>well done 21:35, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This page has now been protected indefinitely due to your personal attacks. --Yamla 21:43, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]