User talk:WhereverUGo87

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An article you recently created, N.E. Heartbreak Tour / Don't Be Cruel Tour, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JSFarman (talk) 01:18, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, WhereverUGo87. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:N.E. Heartbreak Tour / Don't Be Cruel Tour, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New[edit]

Hi in regards to the Together Again tour (and thank you for making the article), I had to remove some unsourced information mostly added by some other editors. In regards to photos leaking of the Milwaukee date of the tour, do you have a source for this. Aaron106 (talk) 00:53, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was from my own eyes on a social media platform and I do have a photo of it, but as far as it being covered by any new outlet or any "creditable" source, no. WhereverUGo87 (talk) 02:15, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you link me to it though, just curious --Aaron106 (talk) 02:20, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also try upload the poster here, so it doesn't get taken down on Wikimedia and click upload a non-free file. [1] --Aaron106 (talk) 02:21, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Prince-nude-tour-1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Prince-nude-tour-1.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:30, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WhereverUGo87. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, " Don't Be Cruel Tour".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 20:54, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023[edit]

Information icon Please do not assume ownership of articles. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Your continued inability to discuss things on talk pages is clearly showing you have ownership over a page when things are edited and cited within Wikipedia policy. And trying to say a reliable source, such as USA Today is citing Wikipedia is false and also defamatory of the publication. Stop. livelikemusic (TALK!) 04:05, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I do not have ownership over a single page on Wikipedia. However, I do know what I add to a page, so in regards to the article, I know for a fact that the article used Wikipedia because I was the one who put that incorrect setlist on the page and it’s the EXACT same one that is on USAToday and other sources that has that incorrect setlist. I have fixed it several times to present the actual setlist and several editors have changed it back to the incorrect setlist because it was on a source like USAToday. I would think Wiki would care more about what is factual than to have false information on their pages because of a source. By the way, I undo things because I feel like they don’t need to be erased but just edited to fit Wikipedia’s standards. Stop assuming that I’m doing things for no reason because I feel like it. Have a good day. WhereverUGo87 (talk) 06:53, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please read WP:RSPS, it is already stated that USA Today is credible and generally reliable as a source. HorrorLover555 (talk) 06:24, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
USA Today is a credible source however, they took the setlist from an incorrect Wikipedia edit WhereverUGo87 (talk) 14:06, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No they didn't. Please read WP:STICKTOTHESOURCE. HorrorLover555 (talk) 14:08, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please refer to one of the revision of the Together Again tour setlist and check the date and time (15 April 2023, 04:14 UTC) [1] then go look at USAToday’s Together Again tour setlist and check their date and time (15 April 2023, 07:49 UTC) [2] snd u could clearly see... The setlist is the exact same... I wonder why.... WhereverUGo87 (talk) 14:19, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Again, WP:STICKTOTHESOURCE. HorrorLover555 (talk) 14:47, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think you should take a look at, WP:Reliable sources#Beware false authority. I don't know why it is so hard to admit that a source was wrong, it's not the end of the world, I even gave you the evidence of why I made my claim and yet you STILL are trying to get me to read an article I've read several times. WhereverUGo87 (talk) 14:50, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Then an alternative solution as there is a discussion on Talk:Janet Jackson: Together Again regarding USA Today as a source, instead of making the same edits over and over, you can discuss there until there is a full consensus that can be reached. Please, go discuss instead. HorrorLover555 (talk) 15:06, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]