User talk:Vuerqex/Archive 1

Bird[edit]

Hi Vuerqex. I've reverted your changes to the Bird article, because there's no concensus for that change. Please see the article's talk page for more information. MeegsC | Talk 00:57, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Too Many Screaming Children"[edit]

A page you created, Too Many Screaming Children, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a band or other musical group, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for musical groups in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Res 2216 firestar 18:27, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. _Gb^T/c 18:46, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Birds are dinosaurs[edit]

Hi Vuerqex. I don't disagree with you! But you need to check all the entries on the Talk page for the Bird article to see the discussion about changing this in the article. After you've read it all, I think you'll better understand why the change hasn't been made yet. Let me know if you have any questions! MeegsC | Talk 23:17, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Vuerqex, I didn't see your message until this morning. To get to the talk page, go to the Bird article, and then click on the tab that says "discussion". That tab is right near the top of the page. On the discussion page (also known in Wikipedia as the "Talk" page), the table of contents is down about one screen. You can use it to jump down to the sections about dinosaurs. Or you can just scroll through and read the whole thing. Some of the dinosaur conversation might be in one of the archives (probably the fourth one—July 2007-February 2008); the archives are listed near the top of the page, on the right-hand side in a pink-colored box. Just click on the one you want to check. I hope this helps! MeegsC | Talk 08:56, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help! See you around Wikipedia! :) MeegsC | Talk 09:40, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dilong[edit]

Hello, Vuerqex;

Please do not move articles without discussion against consensus, as you did with Dilong (dinosaur). J. Spencer (talk) 02:35, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Birds[edit]

Thanks! I agree birds are dinosaurs, some people don't seem to get why--it all depends on what type of classification you follow. A lot of people also forger it goes both ways and some dinosaurs are birds! People look at me funny if I say my favorite bird is Deinonychus ;) Dinoguy2 (talk) 21:20, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WP:BIRDS![edit]

Hi, and welcome to the Birds WikiProject! As you've probably guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of bird-related topics.

A few features that you may find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, outreach, and other tasks.
If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention.
Read our current newsletter, and sign up for (or opt out) of future issues.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any experienced member of the project; we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! MeegsC | Talk 06:44, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Biologist?[edit]

How can you be a biologist if you are only a teenager? Biologist generally means someone who works in biology as an occupation. I don't think hobbies or study would count, although there are categories for biology students and people interested in biology (see Category:Biologists and its parent categories). Richard001 (talk) 07:53, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Newsletter[edit]

Hi Vuerqex: I asked one of the BOT owners to send it out on Oct. 31, but he still hasn't done so. Guess I'll have to find another one. I'm in Reunion at the moment, headed for Madagascar, so it's kinda hard to find the time! In the meantime, you can read it here. MeegsC | Talk 10:35, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Birds November newsletter[edit]

The May 2024 issue of the Bird WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by TinucherianBot (talk) 07:57, 11 November 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Elements[edit]

Hi Vuerqex. The pictures of the radioactive elements you uploaded recently look a little bit strange and with out giving a source of the pictures except own picture colletion makes it hard to belive that somebody has access to those kind of materials to take pictures. Can you explain where you took those photos?--Stone (talk) 06:28, 4 December 2008 (UTC) :Considering the low resolution, they look like they were taken off the web, which may make them unacceptable per the image use policy. If you took them yourself, could you upload higher-resolution versions and add more details about the samples (size, for starters)? Note that the image use policy requires information about the provenance of the image in enough detail so that it can be verified. --Itub (talk) 07:31, 4 December 2008 (UTC) [reply]

~~lenntech.com is the source of the neptunium image.~~
~~:: webelements.com is the source of the promethium image.~~ ~~::::To errase the copyright tag from the image is not very good.--Stone (talk)~~ ~~::I think you should remove them before the anybody finds out that you use them without permission.--Stone (talk) 09:06, 4 December 2008 (UTC)~~ [reply]
~~americanelements.com is the source of the thorium image.~~

~~::Still searching for the source of Helium.png Radium.gif ~~Actinium.jpg~~ ~~Protactinium.jpg~~. --Stone (talk) 10:45, 4 December 2008 (UTC)~~ ~~:::::rsc.orgis the source of the Protactinium image.--Stone (talk) 11:58, 4 December 2008 (UTC):::::rsc.orgis the source of the actinium image.--Stone (talk) 12:06, 4 December 2008 (UTC)~~[reply]

Copy right materilal[edit]

With your uploads you are in conflict with the Wikipedia:Copyright violations guidlines! Please read the guidelines and try not to lable copyrighted material as own work and make it look like you give it into public domain.--Stone (talk) 13:57, 4 December 2008 (UTC) [reply]

But the issue stays the same: The Images you uploaded are not public domain and they are not your work! What is with the other two which are not deleted jet, because I could not find them in the net easyly? Not your work and copied from a web site, I would guess?--Stone (talk) 14:26, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attack directed at a specific editor[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. You might be unaware that this was Personal attack directed at a specific editor but a warning might be sufficent.--Stone (talk) 14:37, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

adding non-word to article[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Titin, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Boghog2 (talk) 17:55, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~: There has already been an extensive discussion on the appropriateness of adding this ~~non~~-word to the titin article and the consensus was not to add. Boghog2 (talk) 17:55, 6 December 2008 (UTC)~~[reply]

::

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. --Arcadian (talk) 21:48, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Vuerqex (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe it to be unfair to get blocked just for adding a 189,819 letter real word to an article. All I did was add the full 189,819 letter official IUPAC chemical name for Titin to the article. I don't understand why you don't consider a chemical name to be a real word. Why don't you understand that Methion... is a real word? And anyway, one of the main reasons that anyone even goes to the Titin article is because they want to see the 189,819 letter full name. But when they get there, they find that, unfortunately, the article doesn't even tell them the full name. The only people who go there for other reasons are scientists and a small number of other people. I don't believe that I should be blocked for giving people what they want, which is the full 189,819 letter name. There is nothing wrong with adding the full name of something to an article.

Decline reason:

Work it out on the talk page when your block expires. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 23:51, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.