User talk:VickiZ

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for voting in favour of the Delrina article as a Featured Article Candidate. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -Captmondo 15:55, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Delrina Nomination

Now that the preliminaries are out of the way, I just wanted to thank you for your support of the Delrina article. And just in general, nice to hear from you!

I often think of the times when I worked on your team as a writer, especially since I am now in the same position myself over at a certain graphics card manufacturer.

Cheers! 8-{)}

Giller Prize

Okay, fair enough; I didn't realize this was the first time they'd ever publicized it. Bearcat 17:48, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Griffin Poetry Prize

I have restored the prize logo. The article is about the prize, so I believe this is the correct logo to display. Your Trust logo could be placed within the article where there is mention of the Griffin Trust. Clerks. 20:29, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. Clerks. 12:48, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

My pleasure. I usually do try to write up at least a quickie stub for any Canadian writer who gets nominated for any of the major literary awards but doesn't have a Wikipedia article yet. I don't always have the depth of knowledge about some writers to do much more than that, but even a quick stub is better than nothing at all :-) Bearcat (talk) 21:51, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Griffin-logo1a.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Griffin-logo1a.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 02:49, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Scotiabank Giller Prize may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[David Gilmour (writer)|David Gilmour], ''Extraordinary''

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:51, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Social media

You'd have to ask the people who drafted WP:ELNO (see point #10 specifically) rather than me — but I can tell you that one example of the issue is Facebook, where one generally has to be a member of the site (which not everybody who uses Wikipedia is) and "like" the page (which not everybody should be required or expected to do) in order to actually see all of the relevant content that's posted there. Furthermore, any remotely intelligent web designer in 2013 will already provide the relevant social networking links on the organization's primary webpage anyway, so our disallowing them as external links is not preventing any user who does want them from accessing them. Bearcat (talk) 18:23, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Anne Carson may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:14, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Cougar Software for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cougar Software is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cougar Software until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stesmo (talk) 18:56, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, Stesmo - I've added comments and questions to the deletion discussion page. VickiZ (talk) 20:38, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Would like the opportunity to bring this page up to appropriate editorial standards and am trying to seek more third party information on the industry and subject matter area in which the company works. Any feedback or examples that you can offer, Stesmo, would be greatly appreciated. As the company is in a similar space to MRI Software, would like to find out why the Cougar Software article is not tagged as "needs work" etc. rather than "to be deleted" ... VickiZ (talk) 20:21, 13 August 2014 (UTC)Copied from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cougar Software

Hi, Vicki. I've quoted your comments&questions to this page so we can have a dialog here. Before nominating Cougar Software for deletion, I spent about 20-30 minutes reading the article, following the references & links and searching via Google & Google news for evidence of notability. Unfortunately, I did not find anything that I felt would meet with the Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) guidelines. If I had found evidence of notability that hadn't been included, I would have gone with a Notability tag similar to what you've pointed out MRI Software has. I haven't looked at MRI Software to see if they have solved the issue referenced by the Notability tag to see if it should be removed or if MRI Software should be nominated for deletion as well.

This nomination is not a reflection upon you as an editor or upon the company. If you haven't participated in an AfD, you may want to check out Wikipedia:Guide_to_deletion. The AfD nomination is a request for other editors to look at this page, investigate if the article, sources and searches show it should stay a Wikipedia article and discuss it for a week or so until an administrator feels consensus has been reached. If the consensus is to Keep the article, it stays. Additionally, you absolutely can edit the current articles and add independent, third-party, reliable sources to show Notability. The AfD process is open to all editors... Including you. If you feel the page should be kept, you should add your Keep message along with a statement you are the author. Stesmo (talk) 22:52, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you again, Stesmo. I appreciate your time and thoughtfulness on this issue. I think there is genuine notability for this company in the industry and space in which they work, but I do need to apply more rigour to evidence / independent information that confirms that the company is indeed notable. And certainly, if you or other editors noting this discussion can contribute - to either fleshing that out or, in all honesty, exhausting that possibility - that would be great. I note in the Wikipedia:Guide_to_deletion that if the reason for deletion is not something spurious but simply a dearth of independent verification, I can presumably revisit adding this page in future when and if more of that sort of information is at hand. Your insights and reassurances are really appreciated. VickiZ (talk) 23:06, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi again, Stesmo. I recall that you were very kind and instructive during this discussion about this particular page being flagged for deletion. I believe it was eventually deleted in 2016, but was surprised to discover recently that it was restored about a year later. I imagine you're very busy on other assignments in this very busy environment, but if you have any general insights into how a page like this gets deleted and then restored, I value your thoughts. VickiZ (talk) 16:39, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mark Doty may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• new-trustee-welcomed/ Judges for the 2015 Griffin Poetry Prize Announced and New Trustee Welcomed (September 17, 2014]</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:26, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scotiabank Giller Prize, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Russell Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Paris Passion magazine

Hello VickiZ,

In the history page of this article I noticed you introduced some information on March 2009 ("Robert Rotenberg was managing editor") which suggests you are well informed about the staff of the journal. In there any chance you were yourself a member of the staff and were living in Paris in the 80s'? In that case we may well have met . If that is not the case, please forget my question ; yours, LouisAlain (talk) 15:10, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello, LouisAlain and thank you for your note. I only know that Robert Rotenberg was involved in this publication - I was not involved in it myself. VickiZ (talk) 20:01, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your answer VickiZ, LouisAlain (talk) 05:32, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, VickiZ. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge submissions

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada will soon be reaching its first-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and no unsourced claims.

You may submit articles using this link for convenience. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 18:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, VickiZ. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, VickiZ. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

"Cougar Software" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect "Cougar Software". Since you had some involvement with the "Cougar Software" redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:26, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

August 2021

Hello VickiZ. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Ted Cadsby, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:VickiZ. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=VickiZ|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Vexations (talk) 18:46, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello Vexations. Thank you for your thorough and instructive attention to these recent edits, including your input on additional citations. I've updated my user page per your recommendation. I also appreciate the suggestion re: the articles for creation process. VickiZ (talk) 21:20, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello again Vexations. Can you clarify how best to present published articles (Huffington Post, The Globe and Mail, Toronto Star)? I added links to the publication web sites to illustrate that he has written on the subjects mentioned in the article. Thanks! VickiZ (talk) 14:02, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Ted Cadsby for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ted Cadsby is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Cadsby until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 15:51, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)