User talk:Unitfreak

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Conventional Weber png v. descriptive text[edit]

On the following page is your png file with a numeric value for the conventional weber which has some descriptive text beneath it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropic_units

The numeric value begins four hundred eighty-three trillion, but your text states billion. I don't know which is correct so I'll leave it to you to fix either the png or the description.

Robert Wyatt (talk) 7:57, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Vitruvian Man[edit]

The width of the man is 24 handbreadths instead of 18.

Rob ten Berge (talk) 10:49, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Are you sure?
I think: 1 Fathom = 18 handbreadths = 24 Palms
Unitfreak (talk) 03:43, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You're right!
But Leonardo's text contains 24 Palms. He doesn't write about handbreadths.
You could probably put those 24 Palms also in the schedule.
 It was my intentention to put this text on the mainpage of lemna vitruvian man.
  • Via Google: "vitruvian man text" (video) you can find a video on YouTube with Leonardo's complete italian text translated into english.
 In this video are the measurements of Leonardo's text mentioned.
 I corrected the 7 feet. That's 6 feet.
 But probably I made a little mistake myself too, but in an other line.
 Your comments please.

Best regards, Rob

PS Your work about gravity is very interesting. --Rob ten Berge (talk) 23:50, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Licensing[edit]

(continued from Talk:Mass#Suggest relocating much of the "Gravitational Mass" section)

I am hardly an expert on this topic, but there are a few important things:

  1. "Public domain" is a precise legal term that basically means giving up all legal rights to the public domain work. It is not the same as saying that anyone can use it anywhere they like.
  2. Text can also be a derivative work and hence be subject to original licenses, just like images.
  3. If any work copied here is indeed a derivative work (or identical to the original work), and the copyright to the original work is owned by someone else, then the protocol is as stated in the original license. As far as I know, Wikipedia does not have its own protocols (except those based on specific licenses). If the original work was your own or in the public domain, then you can do whatever you like.
  4. There are standard user page templates, at least on this wiki, to help indicate the copyright/licensing status of your own contributions (I use them on my user page). If your contributions follow anything other than the standard terms on the relevant wiki, then you should make a clear statement on your user page.

Brian Jason Drake 08:37, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Vitruvian Man measurements has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. I'm truly sorry about this (and may also be quite wrong about it!). It's obvious you've done a lot of work here. But the image masquerades as a historic document, presents unsourced information, and IMO contains errors also. Others will decide what should happen, but please accept my apologies however it goes. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:23, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Editing comments after they've been replied to[edit]

This wasn't appropriate. Please do not edit your comments after they have been replied to: doing so confuses readers and gives a misleading impression of the chronological order of the arguments made. I would appreciate it if you restored the old format of your comments and, if you have a separate reply to me, that you add it after my post. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 09:35, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:Anthropic Bias.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:02, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Anthropic Bias has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:16, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anthropic Bias.png missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:33, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Unitfreak. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Properties of mass[edit]

Template:Properties of mass has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tercer (talk) 20:42, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hand measurements[edit]

Template:Hand measurements has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 07:36, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Metric Scale Evolution[edit]

Template:Metric Scale Evolution has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:45, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]