User talk:Tulesounds

August 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Reel (dance), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 05:03, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clapper stick (August 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Clapstick instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clapper stick and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Clapper stick, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Bilorv_(c)(talk) 01:03, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tulesounds! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Bilorv_(c)(talk) 01:03, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To add to the automated message – I declined the submission because I can't see a difference between the instrument described in the draft, and that at clapstick. If you think there is a difference, I'd appreciated if you could point me to a source identifying the difference. If they are the same, you can just merge the content from your draft into the article clapstick, as it would be a useful expansion. (You can reply to me on this page, or at my talk page.) — Bilorv_(c)(talk) 01:06, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clapperstick v. Clapstick[edit]

@Bilorv: Hi Bilorv. They are different instruments. They are constructed differently, both in terms of shape and material, and are performed using different techniques. In-fact, the Australian clapstick is far more like Cuban claves than they are to Native Californian clapper sticks. They simply have similar names in English. I wanted to include a picture that was not copyrighted, but could not find one. In anycase, here are a websites with pictures, schematics, and video, which should hopefully settle the fact that it is fundamentally different from the Australian instrument you linked to: http://www.primitiveways.com/musical_instruments.html https://arroyosage.blogspot.com/2014/02/making-clapper-stick-native-california.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=26jdj4EBNqw Tulesounds (talk) 05:06, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and sorry for the mistake! I've accepted the article now, so it can be found at clapper stick. (See the automated notice below.) — Bilorv_(c)(talk) 11:43, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clapper stick has been accepted[edit]

Clapper stick, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Bilorv_(c)(talk) 11:36, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Split stick rattle (September 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Split stick rattle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Split stick rattle, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:26, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you![edit]

		The Music Barnstar
		Dear Tulesounds; Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your recent contributions to the article on Irish traditional music. Keep up the good work! With kind regards Patrick. ツ Pdebee.^(talk)^(guestbook) 18:56, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Creating your user page.[edit]

Dear Tulesounds;
Again, thank you for your editorial contributions to various articles on music; they are much appreciated.
I would also suggest that you visit your User page (top left, next door to this Talk page), which is still appearing in red. As you will see when you get there, it currently says "Creating User:Tulesounds" because you haven't actually created it yet; but all you need to do is simply enter some text (anything) and click the Save page button; your user page will then be created and appear in blue from then on. Once you've done that, you'll be able to personalize it to your heart's content later on, and you could look at any other editor's user page to see the many different ways of doing that.
Of course, you don't have to do any of this but, in any case, I wish you well with all your Wikipedia projects!
With kind regards;
Patrick. ツ Pdebee.^(talk)^(guestbook) 19:20, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ballo liscio (November 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SportingFlyer was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I think this could be notable, but the sources don't appear independent enough for me to accept right now (the Caffe which hosts the dances and the web pages for the bands.) Are there any secondary articles which talk about the genre?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ballo liscio and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ballo liscio, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer talk 01:06, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ballo liscio[edit]

Hello, Tulesounds. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ballo liscio".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 08:17, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]