User talk:Tsack98

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tsack98, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Tsack98! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GoingBatty (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

My Green Doctor moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, My Green Doctor, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) In addition, there appears to be a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 TT me 03:20, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Onel5969, Your careful reading of the article My Green Doctor is appreciated. Two areas you have directed me to to revision> The first, correctly attributing my references to the appropriate parts of the article, I will do henceforth. The second concern you have is more difficult for me, your suspicion of a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Neither is the case here. Where does an author make a declaration that there is NO conflict of interest of paid author? Tsack98

Your draft article, Draft:My Green Doctor[edit]

Hello, Tsack98. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "My Green Doctor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 10:29, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Explicit. Thank you for this reminder. Yes, I wish to complete my submission and will do so this Fall. This has been a sore point for me. A year ago, I prepared a well-documented (I thought) small wiki post for our small but important non-profit, charitable organization, the only entity in the world dedicated to providing environmental sustainability resources for healthcare office worldwide. All free; used by tens of thousands of health professionals annually. I receive so many inquiries about it daily that I thought a wiki post would be a useful service. However, after I posted on Sandbox, I realized that I do not understand wiki's complex formatting of documents. I realized this after wiki editors accused me publicly of plagiarism, stealing content, and other misdeeds! In the early summer 2022, hired an online wiki expert to fix my errors but that person backed out for reasons unclear to me. I am now back in the US after spending the summer volunteering in a small rural hospital in Tanzania-- I am catching up on projects and one of those will be to work on our wiki submission. Please consider restoring our draft to Sandbox and please do not delete our draft content! If you know someone who can help me, that would be appreciated. Todd Tsack98 (talk) 13:15, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My Green Doctor Foundation moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, My Green Doctor Foundation, is not suitable as written to remain published. First, it reads as a promotional brochure for the organization, rather than an encyclopedia article. Additionally, it needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 11:45, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Tsack98. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:My Green Doctor Foundation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Sjutt per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sjutt. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Spicy (talk) 15:19, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]