User talk:Truco/Archive 21

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 15

←

Archive 19

Feature List Guidance

You've been pointed out as a Wikipedian who seems to have the whole "Featured List" process under control and a quick check on your main page more than supports that statement. I've been working on improving the championships in Category:Asistencia Asesoría y Administración championships & Category:Championships promoted by Consejo Mundial de Lucha Libre categories except one (which is close) bringing them up to the state where they may be Featured Lists. I know some of them don't pass the 10 entries minimum and some never will. But the rest of them, could you please give me your straight and honest opinion on how much work needs to be done before they'd be ready for FL nominations? Any and all help is greatly appreciated. MPJ-DK (talk) 07:49, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the input, I've tried to incorporate all that I could into Mexican National Heavyweight Championship which is my "test run" of sorts for the Mexican titles FLCs. But I've got a problem - I can only get the main title history table to sort on the first column, not on the name, reigns or dates columns. Could you please have a look at it to see if you can figure out what's wrong so I can fix it? also when you're there give me your opinion on how ready it is?? Thanks MPJ-DK (talk) 01:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

You're right it was better to split them into Mexican National Heavyweight Championship and List of Mexican National Heavyweight Champions, made it easy to cut down the lead text on the list but gave me the option to expand on some of the details of the championship on the main page. I think the list page looks pretty ready, just a bit of textual "TLC" and I'm thinking of nominating it. Thanks for your input, it's been really helpful. MPJ-DK (talk) 08:50, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

In case you're interested I figured out why the table wouldn't sort, it was the "colspan" part of the table that blocked it somehow. I figured that'd be good to know. MPJ-DK (talk) 15:02, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

About List of WALL-E awards and nominations‎

Hey, thanks for the great review. I had a question though: would it be wise to mention top ten lists where WALL-E was ranked. This would be done in another section of course.--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 19:52, 8 March 2009 (UTC) I meant lists like these: http://www.metacritic.com/film/awards/2008/toptens.shtml --Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 08:28, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

List of awards and nominations received by Sheryl Crow

If you have time and interest, I'd be happy if you could take a look at this awards article. You have reviewed several of the other awards lists I have created, and I'd like to get your feedback on the References column issue. I realize most awards lists just place the references at the end of each paragraph, but I thought this way would allow the reader to find sources for each particular entry with ease. It is simply taking each reference and associating it with the appropriate entry. This especially works well for larger tables (one on this list has 32 entries), as opposed to simply grouping all of the sources at the end of the paragraph. Anyways, if this template is not accepted, it can certainly be changed. I just thought I would give it a shot! Thanks! --Another Believer _(Talk) 22:39, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks so much! Looks like I have done enough of these to finally realize what the heck I'm doing! :p Much appreciated. --Another Believer _(Talk) 04:47, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Clint Eastwood filmography

Now that Arnold Schwarzenegger filmography has become a FL, I thought I'd next try a film actor who has had an immense impact on the film industry. I was wondering if you could take a look at Clint Eastwood filmography before I nominate it at FLC. The list details his contributions to film/television as well as his producer, music, and director credits. I've modeled it off of several other FLs (turning it from this to its current state), so hopefully there aren't any major issues. If you can't review it, no worries, I already appreciate your assistance with my first FLC. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 07:37, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Hey

Hey Truco, remember me? lol hey listen I've been working on this article for Arcángel for about a couple of days and I'm really trying to get this article to Good article status. But no other former Project Reggaeton member even looks at it or attempt to fix it up themselves. I'm trying to also get the article rated from various Wikiprojects but no one has rated it yet. I would just like your opinion on how it's looking so far and what YOU would rate the article (if you were a member of WikiProject Biography). El cangri386 ^{Sign! or Talk} 18:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

FLC review request

You seem to be a reviewing machine these days, judging by your talk page and your contributions. Good work :) Anyway, could you review Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of alumni of Jesus College, Oxford: Law and government? It's already been restarted once due to lack of input, and I am the only one who has actually reviewed the article in full. I don't know if I caught everything. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 02:09, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Message

Hello, Truco. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Ratatouille/archive1.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cool

Sorry if I sounded heated. I wasn't talking to you directly, I was talking to anyone about to vote. I don't see how that's uncivil :D .N.G.G. 03:18, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Victoria's Secret Fashion Show models

I have rearranged and each short paragraph on a period in the history of the show now discusses some models. Please revisit Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Victoria's Secret Fashion Show models/archive1.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 03:40, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar! Also, have you been checking the toolbox and reminding nominators to fix the dabs/dead links? I stopped doing this after the toolbox was instituted into the FLC preload. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:35, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

P.S. I am going to be gone from Sunday to Thursday, so FLC will need you more than ever ;) Dabomb87 (talk) 22:38, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Image problem at FLC

Although I have no particular interest in the List of Hot 100 number-one singles of 2005 (U.S.) FLC, I noticed you mentioned a problem with the image. I went experimenting and was wondering for future reference if my change sorted the problem? Best wishes, Rambo's Revenge (talk) 23:31, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Jeff Hardy vs. Matt Hardy at WrestleMania XXV

Sorry my bad, just noticed this. :)

It wasn't confirmed on the official site, so I naturally assumed that it wasn't confirmed. MrTaco (talk) 23:58, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Washington Park

Hi, as someone who previously weighed in on this topic nomination, can you possibly give your opinion on the nomination page as to whether you think the topic should be merged into the existing Washington Park, Chicago good topic, or should stand alone as its own separate topic? Thanks, rst20xx (talk) 02:18, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

reply

nah you can lose it Skitzo Skitzo's Answer Machine 09:56, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

WP:ER

Yes. Simply south (talk) 12:08, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

You asked the question "...do you still wish to keep it open any longer?" so i answered. Simply south (talk) 18:20, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Skunk Anansie Discography review response

Hi, thanks for your feedback. I have addressed each point made with an explanation if needed. Please feel free to re-review the article and re-assess it with a Pass or Oppose as required. Many thanks.Marcus Bowen (talk) 13:55, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I have addressed all the points you made, but need to find a free-use image which I will find myself. Cheers!.Marcus Bowen (talk)

Response

List of retired WWE Championships perhaps? Although using "WWE Championship" could be misleading and make people think it is talking about the main one. I'm starting to think that a merger with the current list would be a good option, perhaps we should start a WP:PW discussion? -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 18:30, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm still iffy about it, but I don't see why you could try a FLC (maybe ask at WP:PW and see if anyone else would support a merge). The lead is a tad too long as well. -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 20:08, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of List of former championships in World Wrestling Entertainment

Hello! Your submission of List of former championships in World Wrestling Entertainment at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 20:06, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 12:14, 15 March 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

The Barnstar of Diligence

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For your all-around great contributions. -down load \| sign! 19:10, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

A.J

I think we should note he won them all. He is regraded as the most decorated man in TNA, and now winning the only other singles belt in TNA makes it ever more true. He has won the NWA Tag, TNA Tag, TNA X, TNA Legends, and NWA World. He is missing the TNA World, but we don't know if the history actually moves over from the NWA World too it, so I'm not sure. Just thought to note it since he is a 4 time NWA Tag, 1 time TNA Tag, 6 time TNA X, 3 time NWA World, and 1 time TNA Legends, plus only other man to hold the TNA Legends besides Booker T.--WillC 02:12, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Okay, I just feel it is a notable fact that he won another title, making his nickname more true that he is the most decorated man in TNA.--WillC 02:22, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to nominate List of TNA X Division Champions for FLC soon, since I'm working on it in a sandbox. Would you mind to work on the lead for me? I'm not sure what should be mention and you do.--WillC 10:02, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Can you?

...spare some time to give some input? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 02:30, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Well, if you see your talkpage, it seems your kind of busy. But, I took a gamble, and I'm wondering if you can help out, cause I really want the list to pass FLC. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 02:37, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Well, you did leave me that message about not having time, so I figured why not work on it and maybe see what I can "accomplish". If you see the list, I "experimented" with it and that's the results I got, but I would love some input before any type of nomination takes place. If you can help, I can appreciate that. I know, I've seen you pop up at FAC, nice work, keep it up. :) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 02:46, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, I appreciate that comment, especially coming from you. That's good, have you tried PR's? I'll get to your comments, I'll let you know. P.S. You didn't congratulate me on my second FA. :P -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 03:01, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

I know your the same ol' Truco, but you've "grown up", with the list and FA's, and stuff. :P I know, I just like bring it up, cause I feel proud for the work I've accomplished, so, if its annoying, I'll stop. Anyways, I got your concerns. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 03:19, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

...check out the Veronica Mars FLC here: Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Veronica Mars (season 1)? Thanks, Corn.u.co.pia • Disc.us.sion 06:10, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

What's up, Cornucopia? Anyways, yeah you've "grown up", I'm not so sure for the "smarter and wiser" thing. Just kidding, you hella smarter than me, obviously. Not sure if its applicable here, but I left some comments, regarding your comments. Though, if you are busy, then its fine, I understand. P.S. Happy St. Patrick's Day. :P -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:52, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Hahaha, I though that whole comment was in reference to me, so I was kinda confused. Luckily I checked your talk page and saw Truco's comments.... :P Corn.u.co.pia • Disc.us.sion 07:35, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Peer review?

Just thought you might want to comment on this after your semi-break. Cheers, -- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 22:50, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Sorry

I hate to bother you, but when you get back on today, could you take a small look at User:Wrestlinglover/List of TNA X Division Champions? I'm finished and don't know anything else to do. It is fully sourced in my opinion and the lead sounds fine but I don't think it is large enough. Just thought I would get your blessing before taking it to FLC.--WillC---(What the F*** have you done lately???!!) 07:01, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

While you are on, could you give me a heads up on if List of TNA X Division Champions has a shot at its FLC?--WillC---(What the F*** have you done lately???!!) 22:02, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

No, problem, I've just been eager to find out if I did everything right. If I have enough sources or not, if everything is sourced. First FLC, trying to make sure everything is good so it passes.--WillC---(What the F*** have you done lately???!!) 22:06, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Your comments are finished. I'm working on the right angled stuff right now. For some reason my power went off and I had to redo everything I had done.--WillC---Joe's gonna kill you!!!) 15:06, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Alright, I'm done. Anything else?--WillC---Joe's gonna kill you!!!) 01:29, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I thought to get them out of the way, it is becoming a big list. I also got that template from Lockdown's first peer review, so I guess I forgot to change the SRX part.--WillC---Joe's gonna kill you!!!) 01:33, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

MOH list

Julian left you a question on the MOH list. — Rlevse • Talk • 18:41, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

List of awards and nominations received by Iron Maiden

Hi, I've been fixing the mistakes you found on the article, but I'm a little confused on some parts. What did you mean with:

General

Fix the dab (as found with the checker tool in the toolbox) [I don't know what do I have to do]

Awards

Each awarding body needs a purpose and a source verifying their purpose and existence. [What did you mean there?]

Thanks for reviewing the article. Rockk3r Spit it Out! 02:21, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Butte question

I was just curious about your comment on the Butte Featured Article review: what do you mean about "Dabs are not up to speed"? Does the article currently link to disambiguation pages, or do you mean something else? Nyttend (talk) 23:40, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Zaprešić

I was wondering if you could do a full-scale review of Zaprešić as it's been a week and absolutely nothing has happened since your comment on Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Zaprešić. —Admiral Norton ^(talk) 19:59, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

I see. Anyway, thanks for your help so far. —Admiral Norton ^(talk) 12:13, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK for List of former championships in World Wrestling Entertainment

On March 20, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article List of former championships in World Wrestling Entertainment, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 23:53, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Comment on my ER

Hi, thanks for the tips on my Editor review! You deserve a pie!

Oli ^OR Pyfan! has given you a pie! Pies promote the kind of hearty eating that puts a smile on your face and a sustaining meal in your stomach. Hopefully this pie has made your day better. Spread the goodness by giving someone else a pie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy eating!

Spread the goodness of pie by adding {{subst:Wikipie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

thanks again, Oli ^OR Pyfan! 04:34, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of acquisitions by Juniper Networks/archive1

The sourcing issues were resolved, so it may be time for you to revisit. Dabomb87 (talk) 13:19, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

RE: Hall of Fame

I haven't forgotten about it. Because you said you would be busy for awhile and wouldn't be able to work on it, I've been working on other side projects for the time being. I still plan to have it finished in the next couple of weeks. Nikki♥311 15:21, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Redirects

I know they are allowed, it's just one of those minor things that bug me. Usually I only fix them when I have a normal edit to make (i.e. posting when posting a reply). TJ Spyke 00:34, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Sorry to be a pain

Culd you hold off until the end of March (this month) and then archive it? You will not need to ask me then. Simply south (talk) 00:40, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Go ahead. Simply south (talk) 13:23, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

World

Where is "world status" being disputed? The dispute ended following Justapunk's withdrawal. This in addition to official sources supporting the "world status" of the listed subjects. ^{--UnquestionableTruth--} 03:31, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Talk page: Ricky Ortiz

Please answer why he is better known by his real name? Ra agg io 00:49, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I read it. Someone moved the article to his real name WITHOUT consensus. No one discussed it afterward. Also, there were complaints about him not being that notable under Richard Young and also wanting to remove the quantifier. Ra agg io 01:18, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Still, don't you agree it should be Ricky Ortiz instead of '"Atlas DaBone? He has vast more exposure as Ortiz... Ra agg io 01:39, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

He was on the practice squad, he never did anything notable for the NFL. Plus, XFL folded before anything fruitful could be achieved. The man's notability has already been achieved, but as a wrestler. The question would be, should he go by his OVW name (Atlas DaBone) or his ECW name (Ricky Ortiz). Ra agg io 01:47, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

USMA Astronauts

Worked your issues on this list. — Rlevse • Talk • 02:02, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

PD review

See commons:Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#PD_review. — Rlevse • Talk • 02:04, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Fountain of Time

Could you please review the dabs again.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 17:16, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Newsletter

I checked the time I made the edit of the DYK. It says the 24th. 16:53 to be truthful. Here is the link: [1]--WillC---Joe's gonna kill you!!!) 02:34, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

They didn't inform me of the DYK until about three hours after it appeared.--WillC---Joe's gonna kill you!!!) 02:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Whatever, I just remember sitting there watching and waiting for it to appear since it was my first DYK. But whatever.--WillC---Joe's gonna kill you!!!) 02:45, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

You didn't hurt my feelings, I'm just bored and paranoid at the sametime. Plus I'm trying to figure out how to win this debate which is weird because I can make a mark on Youtube cry. On here I can't be a jackass, smartass, asshole, or any type of ass lol.--WillC---Joe's gonna kill you!!!) 02:51, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

I believe you have an Yahoo IM account. May I speak to you for a moment? My user name is wmhc818@yahoo.com.--WillC 01:46, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 12:13, 29 March 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

FLC revisit needed

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Chicago Blackhawks players/archive4. Dabomb87 (talk) 12:36, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

New FL criteria discussion: Final phase

Hello, I think we've hammered out a good revised Featured List criteria here. If this passes, there will be quite a few FLs that could soon be delisted just because of 3b. With that in mind, I'd like to get comments and opinions from all FLC regulars and everyone else who has participated in the discussion before it's implemented. Thanks, Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 17:42, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Featured List ready for your eyes.

Per your suggestion, I am notifying you that I have completed the previous suggestions, and I will wait your review patiently. The list in question is: Boston Reds (1890–1891) all-time roster. Thank you.Neonblak ^talk - 23:15, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Changes made, ready for re-viewing.Neonblak ^talk - 04:21, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

GRB 970508 FAC

Greetings! You left some comments on GRB 970508's FAC with which I believe I have sufficiently complied. I'm not sure if you had intended to give the article a full Support / Oppose !vote, but if that is the case, would you mind having another look at the article and letting me know what you think? I just don't want there to be any confusion for Raul / Sandy / Karanacs when they review the FAC. Thanks mate! --Cryptic C62 · Talk 03:06, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

The WPVG Newsletter (March 2009)

Newsletter delivery by xenobot 17:04, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

List of United States Military Academy alumni (non-graduates)

What would you do with this lead? You can respond here. — Rlevse • Talk • 20:52, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Well from you're previous lists I would expand it the same way to give a summary of the list.--Best, ₮RU CӨ 20:56, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

That's where the problem is, there's no common career theme here, just that they didn't graduate. All I can think of is list a sampling of those listed. — Rlevse • Talk • 21:09, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Hmm. Sampling seems like a good idea, and maybe try to find a common ground which the alumni have done after not graduating.--Best, ₮RU CӨ 21:12, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

For all your reviews

		The Reviewers Award
		You review anything and everything at WP:FLC, and that makes you more than deserving. Cheers! KV5 (Talk • Phils) 21:23, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Cheers! I like to give awards, and I only wish I could review as many lists as you do; I'm just not sure about stepping out of my comfort zone. I do a lot with sports and sports reviewing, but I don't know so much about what is and isn't accepted in other topics. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 21:27, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Jesus College scientists

Thanks for your thorough review of, and your support for, this list. I've made some of the improvements you suggested to the other related lists; it's always interesting to see what other eyes spot that I've missed. Regards, and happy editing, Bencherlite ^Talk 21:47, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Bruce Dickinson discography

I fixed the errors you found on the article. Can you take another look? Rockk3r Spit it Out! 04:43, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

I removed the singles without reference. Check it out now. Rockk3r Spit it Out! 19:24, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Input requested

Please comment on my latest suggestion here, which might render another list unnecessary. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:30, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

No need for a reply.

Regarding this. Yes, I do call you immature. No immature person would bring personal issues to an edit summary like that. If you have a problem, bring it to my talk page.

You constantly criticize me and tell me that I'm bitter because you opposed my RfA. I've said it times and times before, your opinion is worthless and means nothing to me. As far as I'm concerned, it's not even there. But your constant edit warring to get your way, and your childish behavior is what drives editors away from the professional wresting project.

Telling others' their opinion doesn't matter to try and get your way is just an example of the immaturity I'm talking about. Your hypocritical statements about myself being bitter and immature, when you prove, every time we meet, that you are quite the same. iMatthew : Chat 00:16, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

JBL

Please explain to me you edits. His ringame is NOT John "Bradshaw" Layfield (JBL). His ring name is just John "Bradshaw" Layfield. JBL is just shorthand or a nickname. It's the same way Montel Vontavious Porter is sometimes called MVP. JBL is not part of his ring name and thus should not be in the ring name section. TJ Spyke 00:24, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Randy Orn

I feel this should remain to stand, as it was officially announced by Vickie Guerrero that Randy Orn would be competing in the WWE title match at Backlash. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.153.107.246 (talk) 17:36, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Umm. Clearly that is how she pronounced it (her being Hispanic and having an accent [which I know]). Orton is the proper spelling.--Tru co 17:38, 7 April 2009 (UTC)