User talk:Treesheads

Welcome!

Hello, Treesheads, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jayjg ^(talk) 02:30, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Categories at Noah Weinberg[edit]

Please stop adding inappropriate categories to the Noah Weinberg article. In some cases the categories are not intended for individuals, and in others, he is already in sub-categories, so should not be in super-categories. Thank you. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:30, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Treesheads, It might be a good idea to read the above introductions to Wikipedia before you jump in and make wholesale changes to articles. In your desire to revert the infobox, you managed to delete all my other changes to that article. Please read Wikipedia:Assume good faith. Kol tuv, Yoninah (talk) 23:14, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Treesheads, your continued reversions on the article are inappropriate. If you persist, I will take administrative action. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:41, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Most articles shouldn't have dozens of categories. Work on the Talk: page with other editors. Jayjg ^(talk) 03:02, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted all edits, including formatting fixes and correction of factual errors. If you wanted to restore the infobox, you should have restored just that. The infobox is now in the article. Please work on the article Talk: page regarding other proposed changes. Jayjg ^(talk) 03:21, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Saw your latest comment at Jayjg's page. If he co-founded Ohr Semayach he should be placed in that category. I'm sorry for removing that one. However, in general please bear in mind Wikipedia's categorization scheme. Best,--brew crewer (yada, yada) 03:25, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Treesheads, I'm sure some of the categories were valid. The place to work it out is on the article Talk: page. And no, none of those edits constitute vandalism in Wikipedia terms. To understand what Wikipedia considers to be vandalism, please read WP:VANDAL. Jayjg ^(talk) 03:34, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion[edit]

Please do not delete sourced material from the encyclopedia without giving a good cause. It is a form of vandalism. If you continue, your account may be blocked. Instead, please us the article talk page to discuss any concerns and seek consensus with other editors. Will Beback talk 02:56, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete sourced material. This is your second warning. Instead, please use the article talk page to explain your concerns. Will Beback talk 18:24, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have reverted more than 3 times on National Conference of Synagogue Youth. Please stop. Treesheads (talk) 19:41, 13 March 2009 (UTC)Treesheads[reply]

Please read the policy in question, WP:3RR. You haven't explained why you're deleting the information. Please use talk:National Conference of Synagogue Youth#Unexplained deletions to discuss your concerns. Will Beback talk 19:43, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stop pretending the Jewish Week is a "fringe" opinion.Mrnhghts (talk) 08:33, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]