User talk:Trampikey/Archive 3
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Image Tagging Image:Asq.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Asq.JPG. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. -- Carnildo 20:38, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Frankpeggy.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Frankpeggy.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. -- Carnildo 23:32, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging for Image:Medium_kellie_shirley.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Medium_kellie_shirley.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.
If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo.
Image copyright problem with Image:Ian_beale.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ian_beale.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. Thank you. -- Carnildo 08:17, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
Request for edit summary
Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 3% for major edits and 32% for minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 79 minor edits in the article namespace.)
This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear impolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 20:00, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks so much for the star and the compliments. Im having a lot of fun writing them and im pleased you think they're fairly good. I'll have a look at doing some of the characters you suggested. Gungadin 18:01, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. While the Wikipedia community appreciates your obvious efforts to increase the amount of information on the site, we'd like to point out our policy against original research and for citing sources for the information you provide. This increases the reputation of Wikipedia as a whole and aids in checking the factuality of that article. Extraordinary Machine 13:01, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Minor EastEnders characters
Hi Josh! Just wanted to run something past you, regarding these EastEnders characters whose articles will never be more than a short paragraph or two. I honestly don't think they all need their own articles on here, so I've started work on a "List of minor characters in EastEnders". I've looked in the EastEnders stub category to see which ones I think should be included, and so far I have twelve characters (David Collins (EastEnders), Edwina Dunn, Megan Macer, D.C.I. Jill Marsden, Chris Pappas, Helen Pappas, Nico Pappas, Peter Pappas, Michael Rawlins, Sid (EastEnders), Ray Taylor and Trish Taylor). I think people like Tracey and Winston could be moved there too, and I'm sure there's a lot more. The existing pages would then need redirects to the new page. Do you think this is a good idea? - Sweetie Petie 22:32, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply. I disagree, and I can't see anything about every character needing its own page, but I'm not going to change anything anyway. Sweetie Petie 13:42, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
The di Marcos
Hi, just letting you know, I changed the names to Di Marco, only in the category listings, so they would be listed under 'D' rather than 'd', which appears in the alphabet after 'Z'. If someone was looking for the di Marcos, they'd probably look under 'D'. This doesn't change the article names as they are listed in the categories, it still says "di Marco", so there's no need to change them back again. :) Sweetie Petie 13:20, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 04:48, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
simon wicks
Hi Trampikey, sorry to bother you, but Ive just been doing some editing on the Simon Wicks page, as I have recently saw some old EE episodes regarding his parantage. Before Lou Beale died she made Pat promise to tell him who his father was, so she admitted that it was Brian Wicks. After which Simon went to see him, but decided not to pursue their relationship as he was abusive.
Was there some further information later on to suggest that Kenny was the father after all? I only ask as Simon's family tree indicates that he's related to the beales and fowlers, which he wouldnt be if he was Brian son. I wasnt sure what had been decided about the Wicks, so thought id check with you.
Gungadin 16:55, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Just out of curiousity...
...have you read Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Date_formatting? Sweetie Petie 00:01, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- okay. I'm just thinking of all the other users whose preferences are set up to display "October 5, 1990" or something else, rather than "5 October 1990". Is that your birthday? :) Sweetie Petie 14:43, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- bless :) Sweetie Petie 22:39, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- I really didn't mean to sound patronising! Please accept my most sincere apologies with this delicious looking muffin. Sweetie Petie 17:56, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
- I didn't mean to sound patronising then either. I'm just sorry. Sweetie Petie 18:06, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
- bless :) Sweetie Petie 22:39, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
The Beale/Fowler family tree
Would you mind terribly if I had a go at redoing the tree so it's a bit less... cramped? I have some nice family tree software I could use :) Sweetie Petie 23:19, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- Cool. Then only thing is, I don't know how to do PNG images. Although I can save the image as PNG... is it that simple? I use paintshop pro. :S Sweetie Petie 11:27, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I'll give it a go. If it doesn't look right, I'll revert back to your version for the time being. Keep an eye on The Beale/Fowler Family in the meantime. Sweetie Petie 11:32, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Just realised your last version of the tree was a jpg anyway! So it probably doesn't matter what I do. Sweetie Petie 11:36, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Well I'm glad you like it! Perhaps I can do other family trees if you're doing other family articles! I didn't put in the other people you mentioned (i.e. the spouses) but I did realise the Colette Flaherty mistake :) I'll add the other spouses soon. Sweetie Petie 12:01, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- I'm thinking of using different colours to show relationships, i.e. married, divorced and never married. What do you think? Sweetie Petie 12:23, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Well all it'll mean is the line between say Michelle Fowler and Grant Mitchell will be blue, and the line between say Ian and Cindy Beale will be brown. Those are the only colours available, so I can't show if someone has been widowed, but I don't think we need to show that. It won't be very complicated, really. Sweetie Petie 13:23, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
Did she die? I don't remember her dying. Someone wrote an article about her and said she died. Please help. Sweetie Petie 22:25, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- I thought she didn't die! But I couldn't remember what did happen. Thanks. Sweetie Petie 16:00, 9 May 2006 (UTC)