User talk:Trakinwiki

This is Trakinwiki's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amit Vij has been accepted[edit]

Amit Vij, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jupitus Smart 18:26, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joginder Pal has been accepted[edit]

Joginder Pal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Celestina007 (talk) 23:36, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barindermeet Singh Pahra has been accepted[edit]

Barindermeet Singh Pahra, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— A.A Prinon ^{Leave a dialogue} 09:42, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Trakinwiki

Thank you for creating Barindermeet Singh Pahra.

User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Too many mentions of the constituency. Keep one mention in the infobox and one other in the text of the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:01, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Thank you Trakinwiki (talk) 08:03, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Baldev Singh Khaira has been accepted[edit]

Baldev Singh Khaira, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 07:41, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kulwant Singh Pandori has been accepted[edit]

Kulwant Singh Pandori, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 04:05, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harinder Pal Singh Chandumajra has been accepted[edit]

Harinder Pal Singh Chandumajra, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 04:07, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Trakinwiki

Thank you for creating Kulwant Singh Pandori.

User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

the constituency is mentioned too many times in the text. once in the text and once more in the infobox is enough.

Also, i've noticed an error in a lot of the politician articles that you've created. They seem to be current (incumbent) politicians. As such their successor field in the infobox should be empty.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:48, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jitendra Pal Singh Billu has been accepted[edit]

Jitendra Pal Singh Billu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 13:14, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article for Creation:Trishna Singh[edit]

Request you to please review the above links.

Trishna Singh has been part of all these shows, movies, web series and her name is already mentioned in the cast of all these projects on Wikipedia.

https://www.republicworld.com/amp/entertainment-news/web-series/prajakta-koli-and-rohit-saraf-starrer-mismatched-season-2s-shooting-to-begin-in-august.html

https://www.bollywoodlife.com/web-series/entertainment-news-what-to-watch-today-on-zee5-amazon-prime-video-and-netflix-sweet-tooth-incendies-rangbaaz-and-more-1843470/amp/

https://www.hotstar.com/in/tv/crime-next-door/1260062944/that-night-part-1/1260063028

And Wikipedia pages of the movies as well.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bachchan_Pandey

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanguard_(film)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mismatched

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_Next_Door

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swami_Ramdev_-_Ek_Sangharsh

You can also visit her IMDb profile. https://m.imdb.com/name/nm8128008/

Please help to create this article and approve. Spider1217 (talk) 17:21, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sunil Dutti has been accepted[edit]

Sunil Dutti, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:31, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sukhpal Singh Bhullar has been accepted[edit]

Sukhpal Singh Bhullar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

The Living love ^talk 20:37, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fatehjang Singh Bajwa has been accepted[edit]

Fatehjang Singh Bajwa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Eternal Shadow Talk 21:05, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harpartap Singh has been accepted[edit]

Harpartap Singh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 00:32, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pirmal Singh Dhaula has been accepted[edit]

Pirmal Singh Dhaula, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheWikiholic (talk) 17:17, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gurmeet Singh Meet Haher (September 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheWikiholic was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Meet Hayer instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gurmeet Singh Meet Haher and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gurmeet Singh Meet Haher, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheWikiholic (talk) 17:20, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TheWikiholic: thank you for telling me that the subject is already on wikipedia. Definitely I'll improve the subject. Trakinwiki (talk) 17:58, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Trakinwiki

Thank you for creating Satkar Kaur.

User:Celestina007, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good job

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Celestina007}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Celestina007 (talk) 11:23, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Trakinwiki! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, AFD close related issue, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Film article creation.[edit]

Hi, you created Yodha film article but it's filming not starts yet. Next time you should remember to create film article atleast filming starts. Otherwise you article will be deleted soon. Sush150 (talk) 07:04, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sush150: i didn't know that next time definitely i will keep that mind. Thanks Trakinwiki (talk) 08:45, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Arham Abbasi[edit]

Hello, Trakinwiki,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Tamingimpala and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Arham Abbasi, for deletion, because [consensus decision] previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Tamingimpala}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Tame (talk) 16:05, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arham Abbasi[edit]

Hi! Just to let you know that there's a draft of an Arham Abbasi article here. You might consider improving that and submitting it for AfC review – that is, if you're really sure that he is notable? (he wasn't on 10 January, what has changed since then?). Anyway, good luck, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:06, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Justlettersandnumbers: Hey thanks for you suggestion. I'll improve the draft and submit the draft for review, as the subject is notable enough. Thanks Trakinwiki (talk) 22:46, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arham Abbasi (February 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AafiOnMobile was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Nothing substantial at this moment that helps the subject pass WP:NACTOR, and GNG is too far.. Please don't resubmit without substantial improvement, it would be declined again.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arham Abbasi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Arham Abbasi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

─ The Aafī on Mobile ^{^(talk)} 06:34, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arham Abbasi has been accepted[edit]

Arham Abbasi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Batamore (talk) 18:09, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Toolsidas Junior[edit]

The article Toolsidas Junior has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Film appears to fail WP:NFILM as there are no reviews available and at least 2 are needed.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 23:25, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hayan Abdulla moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Hayan Abdulla, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 09:27, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Iira Soni[edit]

Hello, Trakinwiki,

Please only move recently created articles to Draft space. It's not appropriate to draftify articles that have existed for years. If you believe an article should exist in main space, you can use WP:PROD or WP:AFD. Thank you for your contributions! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:36, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: Thank you. Keep guiding me like this. Trakinwiki (talk) 04:30, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:DasSoumik per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DasSoumik. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 15:49, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trakinwiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

After reading the reason of Extraordinary Writ I don't know what to write. Someone is editing and pattern behaviour is matching that does not mean I am a sock. May be i didn't knew better language, maybe I was following some editors that how to write. But you guys didn't ask. You guys just blocked me. I was just editing and trying to crack how to find new article, how to edit, how to improve my created article, how to contribute more on wikipedia. I was editing because I was loving create wikipedia page so that people are able to read something from reliable place. I just want to thank you for blocking me, who was trying to grow himself and trying to learn. Thank you for not asking me a single question before blocking me, like whether I know DasSoumik, BapinGhosh or not. The answer is no, i don't know them at all. I was just following some user who were creating article just like that. After following some experienced editor I tried to create some good article and I think I have done a great job. By the way thank you

Decline reason:

Using the same exact phrases as a sock puppet is rather odd behavior. I'm not sure how you'd explain that away, but you have not successfully done so. I don't know who this "experienced editor" is that you were following, but maybe if you said who it was, it might help. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:17, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trakinwiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@NinjaRobotPirate: as you asked me who this experienced editor. I don't know who they are it's been a year I was following them. When I was new on wikipedia at that time election result was out. And some people were creating political persons wikipedia and I was following them and just using their template like He was elected as the member of, some editors are writing subject is meeting WP:NACTOR, lack of in-depth coverages. So I started following them. Before applying AFC reviewer and New Page Reviewer I followed some editors request and wrote that I have created that much article. Than I applied. Some months before I got know about User:TheAfi, User:Rickyurs, User:Sush150 and followed their edit how they edit, how they improve article, and I was doing that. I started creating Movie article. I was improving those article. And if you see you will get to see those film article got so much views. Finally I just want to say I am not connected with DasSoumik and Bapinghosh at all, I don't know them. I just came on wikipedia started editing randomly. I had created some article, gained some experience learn a lot that is much for me. Now I don't know you will unblock me or not but I am happy to learn a lot of thing here. If the checkuser didn't block me than i could have learn more thing from fellow editors as I had applied for AFC reviewer right. Thank you wikipedia for teaching me so much thing. Thank you all the contributors. You guys keep up good work and give us some free knowledge as you guys are doing since last 20 years. Thank you again

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you. This is a check user block. You have not addressed the reasons for yor block. Please see the WP:GAB for more information. Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:44, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.