User talk:TomasGerbs

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TomasGerbs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not sock. My reasons, request, and questions: How and why my userpage's and talkpage's discussions all reverted, is this legal, if not who is the responsible for it? I would like to see an investigation from an independent admin who is NOT editing on Obama's page. The user Scjessey suspected that I'm a sock only from my second edit, I regard it clearly as POV. Note also that in the past this user banned on Obama's page and who blocked also because he made repeated personal attacks, see: User_talk:Scjessey

Decline reason:

WP:NOTTHEM Smashville^talk 14:32, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.