User talk:Tiseptiko

February 2015[edit]

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Helpsome (talk) 14:13, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 17:03, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015[edit]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! 220 of ^Borg 17:03, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Abu Taisir[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Abu Taisir, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=abdul_hadi_daghlas_1.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:22, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Abu Taisir[edit]

Hello Tiseptiko,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Abu Taisir for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:33, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Helpsome. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Helpsome (talk) 09:16, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Helpsome (talk) 18:41, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sante Geronimo Caserio, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Austrian and Hugo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Helpsome (talk) 10:04, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:The end of Anarchism ?.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:The end of Anarchism ?.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked[edit]

I have initially blocked you because of your mass changes of articles, and addition of poorly written and/or partisan material. Because you weren't really acting in bad faith, I have unblocked you, but you need to understand that Wikipedia is not Anarchopedia. It has various policies and guidelines, some of the basic ones are:

Verifiability. Contents of articles need to be sourced using reliable sources.
Neutrality. Articles need to be written in a neutral and factual manner; they aren't opinion pieces.

Oh yes, and if you don't feel the need to be bound by the rules of the English language, you are only adding extra work for people who have to clean up your contributions. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 19:01, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ITN credit[edit]

On 18 May 2015, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Battle of Ramadi (2014–15), which you substantially updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

ThaddeusB (talk) 14:40, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of wars and battles involving al-Qaeda[edit]

Please stop removing the |- |} at the end of the table. You have removed it 4 times now. Tables are supposed to end with it.

Also, the articles needs references and dates. Bgwhite (talk) 06:14, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of wars and battles involving al-Qaeda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al-Shabab. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of wars and battles involving al-Qaeda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jaysh al-Sham. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Al-Qaeda may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

//www.dawn.com/2001/11/10/int3.htm |title=Osama men plan to target Delhi: Kathmandu receives threat] |work=[[Dawn (newspaper)|Dawn]] |date=November 10, 2001 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/
* [[[[List of wars and battles involving al-Qaeda]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:47, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of al-Qaeda members[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of al-Qaeda members requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. The Avengers 13:58, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 20 January[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of wars and battles involving al-Qaeda page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation[edit]

Your addition to Helmand Offensive (2015-present) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Nykterinos (talk) 00:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the whole article seems to be a copyright violation, and may have to be speedily deleted. You copy-pasted text on Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant in Libya, too. I see you have been warned about copyviol before. Have you read Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources? Nykterinos (talk) 00:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but this edit doesn't even remotely address the copyright violations of the article: you just deleted some sentences and kept all the other copy-pasted chunks of text, without even trying to paraphrase them. You need to completely re-write the article with your own words (WP:Close paraphrasing is not enough), summarizing the main events and removing irrelevant details included in news sources. You should also improve your English, as you filled the text with grammatical and syntax errors. In the meanwhile, I have to nominate the article for deletion, per WP:G12. Nykterinos (talk) 21:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Helmand Offensive (2015-present)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Helmand Offensive (2015-present) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nykterinos (talk) 21:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Helmand Offensive (2015-present), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kunar, Sar-i-Pul and Dishu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello Tiseptiko, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 01:52, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New battles in Yemen[edit]

Hi Could you create the article of the Nihm offensive and of the new battle of Aden ? Reagrars. --Panam2014 (talk) 14:44, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For Nihm , it is usually more of an offensive to the north in the governorates of Sana'a, Marib and Jawf . It started in December 2015. In the battle of Aden, it began in January 2016 between the popular resistance and AQAP . Could you create an article about popular resistance ? Regards. --Panam2014 (talk) 18:49, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me. Are there sources that speak of battle in the city and port of Midi ? And for the 2014 battle of Amran ? Regards. Panam2014 (talk) 12:42, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mexican Drug War map[edit]

Hello Tiseptiko. That sounds good. I will be working on that and probebly will make it by the next week. Thanks for the notice! Ali Zifan 22:43, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yemeni Civil war map[edit]

Hey Tiseptiko,

I don't want to be unfriendly, but what exactly did you do with the Yemeni Civil War map? There are as far as I can see no changes to the previous version, but the quality of the picture is far worse now.--Ermanarich (talk) 14:48, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, it's me again, I've got another question. I'd like to help improving these maps around Yemen and so on. What do I have to consider when I do it? Is there any instruction for how to do it? And a little off-topic: Why exactly do you hate Pope Francis? I mean, yeah, he is a pope, but compared to the previous popes he seems to be a nice one...--Ermanarich (talk) 20:04, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the link; It was broken because my signature was partially included.

However, I also think that the world may have been created by a simple coincidence. The question is rather how is it for the Universe? And is there a sense behind all? And what was before the universe, when did the time start? Most probably we as humans aren't even able to understand these things at all, as well as a dog doesn't know what colours are and isn't able to understand for example Analysis.

I actually live in Europe, more exactly in Germany. I'm 19 years old and I'm learning for my Abitur at the moment. How is it with you?

Ok, now the Rojava-thing: I don't know how far you know the Charter of the Social Contract of Rojava. I think it's a really great achievement in the struggle for democracy, peacy between the peoples and social equality. There is only one thing that I'm a bit sceptic about: No matter if socialistic or not, a system has to be able to keep up with the international economic system, because otherwise its progress will be weaker than the international, which leads to underdevelopment and in conclusion to refusal from the population. Also I'm not so sure if it's able to organise bigger projects like (for the case that this system will be adopted in many other regions of the world) a start of a space-rocket or something. Of course the strong "grass-roots" are very important, but to ensure the development of the humanity it also needs big projects. (I have to admit, I'm a real fan of ideas like Mars-settlement or the Exploration of the Jupiter Icy Moons) So in general my question to you: How do you think of the Charter of the Social Contract and my thoughts about it. See you,--Ermanarich (talk) 21:14, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I can't answer today, but I've seen your message. Tomorrow then. --Ermanarich (talk) 17:05, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, then. For the supposes on the beginning of the universe and so on I can agree. For Rojava, I'm actually not very sure, how exactly their economic system looks right now. In one article it's said, that there is no ownership. But I'm actually not very sure, what this means for their economical system. That a leftist government doesn't neccesarily lead to poverty can be seen in the Scandinavian countries. That's the reason why I strongly believe that planned economy as it existed in the Soviet Union is no solution. So what are the alternatives? There are even ideas to completely remove the money. But to be serious, I don't think that this is realistic. Furthermore it's to be questioned (aside from that the economy would most likely collapse) if it would help to improve the equality on earth. I believe that the best solution is a (real) social market economy, more precise a strongly regulated market economy. Germany actually refers itself as being a social market economy, but that's neither true nor what I mean. Of course, the german economy is much more regulated than for example the US-american. But it's still very very far away from what I mean. It must be prevented, that there are monopolisations, that there is produced far too much (expecially in the food industries, this could be done for example with monetary fines(money to be paid)), that workers get far too less money compared to managers, that the richs can't flee to tax exiles. Another idea in this area I came across was the idea of common good(sometimes also called common good-economy). It's very important to socialise the economy, which is one of the most darwinistic and barbaric things in our culture. With socialize I mean to ouse the thinking that profit is all and bring in more, well, social thinking. Fairtrade is an extremely good example for this. But it's still very important to be aware that too much regulation leads most probably to economic decline. The Soviet Union is definitely one of the worst example for alternative systems. I see almost nothing positive in what the Soviets did. At many points, they were racist, at every time a horrible regime and in their Gulags more humans died than in the KZs of the Nazi-regime in Germany. They disfigured hundreds of cities, opressed the population, they were centralistic and so on, the list of negative things is very long. I think that not any modern leftist organisation should see them as an idol. That's for example why I don't like the Marxist–Leninist Party of Germany.

And to the talk about the problems of nations, peoples and cultures we had before: That's a thing again there. I really love albanian and greek culture for example. There is of course no culture in the world which I don't like. Rather that I just find some more and others less interesting. And personally I see greek and albanian culture as being very interesting. But it's also important to note that culture isn't a fixed thing. In contrary, culture has to develop as everthing else has to do, too. A culture that doesn't develop will most probably die out. I know that your side on this topic is rather like it would be better that they would all disappear. But I actually think that it may be possible to remove racist thinking without a disappearance of peoples. In Europe, to make this example, hundred years ago, almost every peoples hated their neighbors. But today, this enmity is vanishing. A quite beautifaul word, but with an sovietish colouring is the Fraternity of peoples, which could I think return. The source of aggression between peoples was very often that one ruled over the others and opressed them. But in Europe, this is in most of the countries a part of history. I'm also very interested in history and politics and I like to draw, too. But I don't think that my skills there are enough that I could earn my money with it. I rather plan to become a journalist or something in this direction. But my plans for my future aren't that clear yet.--Ermanarich (talk) 21:33, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, will come this evening.--Ermanarich (talk) 17:27, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Tiseptiko. To start with the economic system. Of course, there are still rich and poor people in Scandinavia, but Scandinavia still has by far the smallest gap between the rich and the poor in the world, which is mostly due to high taxes (especially for the richs) etc. The thing with Scandinavia is that they prove that a social state doesn't necessarily fuck up financially. It has to be tested out how far a socialisation of a government can go before it begins to be critically for the economy. Of course it's to be questioned if this is a fixed model for every country or rather depending on many other factors, too.

Because you mentioned China and Vietnam (and Northern Korea would be amongst them, too). It's a shame that they still carry this title, because they haven't got anything to do with socialism. I don't know much about the recent situation in Vietnam, but for China and Northern Korea... well, they're really bad places. And they still make words like socialism look very bad in people's eyes.

For the things you wrote about the Soviets I can mostly agree. I actually think that this just shows again, that both systems have their advantages and disadvantages, so a compromise of them must be better, because it can include advantages of both. Again, even Scandinavia is still quite far away from that.

Regarding the money-thing, I'm not sure if you got me right. I don't think that the remove of the money would be a good thing, because it doesn't really attacks the roots of the problems. Also, a globalised economy can't work like this, without money. And I'm not sure if the believe in money is such a big part of our society and thinking, that it wouldn't lead to alternatives (More clearly: That if the money is removed, the thinking is still so fixed on money, that other things would be used as things similiar to money). My critical view on Anarchism as similiar reasons. I don't know if it's stable enough to exist successfully and in the way the inventers imagined it to be.

To Rojava I have to admit that I still didn't fully understand, what their economic system is now exactly. Because there are no mentions of a planned economy, to make only one example. However, Rojavas model of equality, fraternity of peoples and so on can be viewed hardly different than positive.

I don't think that it really needs a disappearance of the peoples to remove racism. To look at one example, racism in Germany: There is a clear difference between the cities and the lands. That's because in a city, you have contact to foreigners, on the countryside you often doesn't. But if you know something, it immedeately doesn't seem that menacing anymore. And our world is globalizing, means the contact with foreigners and strangers grows. And in conclusion to that, the degree of racist thinking sinks. In such a level, cultures can easily coexist friendly. It's a matter of contact.

One thing I'd like to discuss with you is your sight on the refugee-crisis in Europe at the moment. What do you think about the reactions of the governments, is it really a that big problems and other things.

Oh, and still one more: Are there music bands you can recommend to me? Or what are the types of music you listen to?--Ermanarich (talk) 20:42, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The answer will come tomorrow. See ya!--Ermanarich (talk) 22:06, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The thing with economical system is the most complex, so I'll come to it later. Let's start instead with the refugees. I actually don't think that it's such a problem, especially food we really have more than enough in Europe (Or at least in Germany; but the two times I was in Greece it didn't seem to have a food-shortage; By the way, the one time I was on Chalkidiki, the other time in western Peleponnes; Two really great holidays!) The jobs could be rather a problem, but even there I think that the economy can easily "swallow" this problem. The problem in the so called refugee-crisis are not the refugees but much more the right and conservative part of our populations. I can just speak for the situation in Germany there (If we're there: How is it exactly in Greece? Did you have direct contect with refugees yet or just heard of them in the media?), but here it's not that Germany couldn't do it. The problem is the right wing, who gets increasingly strong and is also comitting attacks on Refugee-houses. And the other big problem is the racist dictator Erdogan in Turkey. He wants to get money from the EU for keeping the refugees back. But at the same moment, he slaughters the Kurds and decreases the freedom of the press.

I listen mostly to different types of Rock (Punk, Indie and so on), Brass, Reggae and some german Hip Hop/Rap groups, but the last ones primarily if they are political. I actually like political bands but it's also ok if they are not. What I actually don't really like is the Chart-music in the radio. For political music, one of the greatest bands I know is Anti-Flag.

For Anarchy and moneyless systems I can just repeat, that I'm pessimistic to this. The try to establish Communism failed heavily and without exception. I actually think that a stable leftist government can only arise with a slow development towards it. A tense development which is able to see and correct errors and problems. And maybe with such a thing it would be somewhen possible to establish an anarchy. But it's essentially, that you change the people. If they are changed, the government will change, too. But such a process just needs time. That counts for a possible remove of the money, too. Especially there it would need really long to change people's mind. Due to that, Anarchy isn't even my aim, because I don't see it as being realistic. Another problem is that I don't believe in the good will of the humans you mentioned. Many humans may be good. But by far not all.

Another problem of Anarchy is that it's not very organised, if not even chaotic. Bigger project are hardly to manage in that case. I'm not as radical, because I believe that a strongly regulated capitalism would allow a minimalisation of the gap between the rich and the poor. I don't really see a big problem in smaller hierarchical systems, as for example an elected president at the top of a country. What's the anarchist argument against that, exactly?

It's quite funny: Regarding Anarchism, you are very optimistic, but regarding the disappearance of racism, it's me! :D --Ermanarich (talk) 21:21, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

About anarchism: Yes it is essentially about changing the people. Yes, if they are changed, the government will change, too. And yes "such a process" "needs time". But such slow process IS realistic. If something is slow, it does not mean it is not realistic. In fact it is not only realistic, but beneficial to help steering away any country away from authoritarianism (a nominally democratic country always has to some degree also authoritarian traits, less or more so). It is 2024 now and we (every country) were in this process. We have aquired already some degree of anarchism. We were obviously not at point zero. Often the question is not about going further, but not going back. It can be a struggle even to keep the current state, if you do realize we were not at zero point. If anarchism traits of people scale back, then the state takes shape more authoritarian. The state's facade presents itself simply, but in fact there is nothing more complex, shifting gradually under the surface. If this happens, authoritarian rule impairs other traits that you have valued. As such anarchism is not only realistic, but a useful (if not required) ingredient of a viable alternative to authoritarianism. It's not like "such a process just needs time". It needs not only time, and it is not given Anyway, thanks for your editing. IHaveBecauseOfLocks (talk) 05:48, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Tiseptiko. I've seen your message. I'll answer tomorrow to it. Today I'm too tired and besides that I still have to learn...--Ermanarich (talk) 21:55, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To the refugees: Of course, that's in Greece a completely different situation compared to the one in Germany. And even if many right-wing idiots in Germany are against the refugees, our economy and job market can easily bear this problem. The richer european countries can't leave the problem with the refugees up to Greece. By the way, what do you think about the negotiations (refugees/EU-membership) with Turkey? Your ideas of comics really sound interesting! What are they about? To the music: I hear Kasabian too, the other ones rather not. But I'll make a try! And to the last: I hope you don't think I'm a nationalist!--Ermanarich (talk) 23:56, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late answer. I wasn't at home yesterday and I thought that I've read in your answer, that you wanted to write more about the refugees. However, the thing with the comics really sound interesting! Let's see, maybe the comics will be translated into english or even german one day. You have to tell me then! Are they political, too?

About the nations, I'm even aware that my thinking there isn't rational. But I'm just like this at the moment. The future will show if I change my mind there.

About Che Guevara... If I'm honest, I didn't really occupy myself with him so far. He was a very active person, who spread the idea of a socialist to many countries, especially in Latin America. The dictature of Castro is a rather negative thing for the socialism in my eyes. Of course, his ideas for equality and so on were good, but I heard that he was very brutal in his battles and authoritative. But I don't know so much about him? Maybe you could tell me your opinion and some informations about him.

Another theme I'd to talk about is the rise of right parties in Europe. Did you hear about the results of the german regional elections in Baden-Württemberg, Sachsen-Anhalt and Rheinland-Pfalz? A right-wing populist party, the AfD ("Alternative for Germany") got 15% in the first, 24% in the second and 12% in the third state. I can't tell you how frustrated I am. And angry. I really can't hear these idiots anymore...--Ermanarich (talk) 16:11, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Tiseptiko. I saw your message. Can't answer today, I have to learn for my examen tomorrow. Tomorrow maybe also not, depends on how early the party begins...--Ermanarich (talk) 19:36, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'm back again. I agree that the refugees should be split over Europe. Also they should not be put in great bulks of one ethnicity (like Syrians), because otherwise, parallel societies will rise. And Europe shouldn't make a deal with the Turkey. Because this country is ruled by a racist dicator and abuses the kurdish minority. To Guevara: I didn't knew he was such a ... well, asshole.. I mean Stalin shouldn't be a idol, he is a war criminal which plays in the same league as Hitler does. He was actually even a racist, not against Jews but against other minorities in Russia like Chechens, Tatars etc. I mean it can still owed to him maybe, that Latin America has such a strong leftist movement today. But one has to look at both sides.

I wouldn't say, that the right movement is stronger than in other European countries (like France for example with around 30% voting for Front National). The thing is rather, that it rose up from the nothing. Last elections, the AfD didn't yet exist (oh.. no they existed yet; But they weren't right wing populist but Euro-sceptical Neoliberalists; they had 4,7%, means they didn't get any seat), and the nationalists, the National Democratic Party of Germany failed to jump over the five-percent rule, they got 1,3%. The right wing increased in power the last year and now they have approximately 15%. (of course they haven't any seat in the parliament yet, but only because the next elections are 2017) Besides that the AfD is a super ugly party. They are not only xenophobic racists, they are also neoliberal and pro-nuclear power. Really a bunch of idiots. And although their police is really against the poors, still around 38% of the enemployed people in Sachsen-Anhalt (the State which had 24% AfD-Voters in total) voted for the AfD. I could cry. Oh, what's interesting, too is that Germanys ruling party, the CDU is conservative but mostly not really right-wing. But they are quite neoliberal, too, although not as heavy as the AfD. The Social Democrats are unvotable, they completely lost their profile. They say quite good things, but they do exactly the same things as the CDU. What do you mean with school occupations? :D I wouldn't say that the german government is really authoritary. The police is it, but in general, it's rather like the typical cliché of Germany, order is it all. It's really bourgeois. In the schools, it's quite like this, but I'm a very lucky person in this thing, because I'm not at a school of the government but on a Waldorf/Rudolf-Steiner-School. Maybe you heard about them, it's an alternative school (whith much alternative and leftist thinking in it, also there is a bigger focus on art and the personal development of the pupils than at the normal schools), it's everything but not authoritary there.

And to your comics, I can just repeat that it sounds very interesting! See you,--Ermanarich (talk) 21:36, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Tiseptiko. Sorry that I let you wait so long, I had much to do the last days. The answer comes tomorrow.--Ermanarich (talk) 23:38, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Finally... I have to confess, that the southern european countries doesn't really have this right tendencies in a number that the middle-, northern- and especially eastern European countries do. But they are rather a exception. What exactly do you mean with that this other one hates "it"? The school system? But it's true, I'm really lucky to be able to go to such a school. And for my thoughts on the Chechen War, you have to specify which one you mean. See you!--Ermanarich (talk) 15:44, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'm fine, there were just many things to do :) Regarding the school system, that's true, even if I can't say very much to it, since I'm not directly involved (as I said). And to the Chechen War. I see it as a real catastrophe and a crime by Russia. Furthermore, this war was the trailblazer for the rise of the Islamists in Northern Caucasus. It is definitely understandable, that Chechenia wanted to be independent. The following attack from Russians was very brutal and without real justification. Today, the situation there is a real catastrophe: Ramsan Kadyrow rules extremely authoritarian, there is no free press, people are getting abducted, the fate of thousands of chechens is still unclear (they are either dead or in secret jails) and not at last the Islamists are very strong and ousted the moderate Sufism of the region mostly. What do you think?--Ermanarich (talk) 21:00, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's exactly what I thought to know so far about this war. I'd recommend you a documentation to the situation there today too, but sadly it's only available in german or french. However, I have another question to you: What do you think that will happen in Turkey? Will it stay as it is right now or will there be major changes? And if yes, in which direction may they go? What will be the role of the PKK on the one and of Daesh on the other hand?--Ermanarich (talk) 22:03, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Answer comes tomorrow--Ermanarich (talk) 22:28, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, to begin with Turkey. Regarding Erdogan, I just hope that something unexpected happens and he dissapears from the policy... It's not realistic, but I just heavily dislike this criminal. I don't think that the PKK will reach anything in Turkey. As long the whole west is against them they won't be able to achieve anything. The biggest game change would be if the USA would stop backing Erdogan. But that's completely unrealistic, even if the USA cooperates with them partially in Iraq and Syria. Maybe with Sanders, if it comes so far... Right now they are seen as a Terror organisation. The thing is that they really need to dissociate from any kind of terroristic attacks. As an example they need to condemn the attacks carried out by the TAK in the last time. With Daesh it's the thing. I'm really not sure how strong they are in Turkey and how strong their relations are with the government. If they have good secret relations with the government, they won't start a rebellion. But if they are strong and against the government, they could start a rebellion. This rebellion wouldn't overthrow the Turkey of course, but it would maybe become a gamechanger for the Kurds in Anatolia.

I can't specify it very well, but I have the feeling that there will be some bigger changes in Turkey soon.

"By the way, you believe that the coalition airstrikes on ISIL and Qaeda, are strategically correct, and moral fair?" Well, I guess if you point at al-Qaeda I guess you include the situation in Yemen, too. The thing is really difficult. Of course airstrikes inflict heavy casualties under civilians. On the other hand, cities like Kobane would have fallen to Daesh and also, the YPG would be much weaker in Syria today. To be honest I don't see many alternatives. To make another example: SAA in Syria managed to defeat Daesh in the younger past. Tadmur/Palmyra is reconquered. Without airstrikes, Daesh would be ways stronger. Same in Yemen, AQAP is only gaining ground because Saudi airraids aim mostly at the Houthis.

And as we're already in Yemen: What do you think of the Houthis, what of Hadi? And who exactly is this "Southern Movement"? I saw a movie on youtube by Vice News, but it's not really informative on their aims and the Wikipedia articles also doesn't show their aims.

And another thing, regarding the Iraq. I guess you already heard of the Group of Communities in Kurdistan, the Umbrella-organisation which includes YPG and PKK. It has some other members like the PJAK in Iran (but which is exiled as far I know... Oh WHAT?!... They are designated as a terrorist organisation, too). Also, the Yezidi militias (YBŞ and YJÊ)of the Iraq are kind of offsprings of it, even if they have no political arm. Now there is also a Political Party in Iraqi Kurdistan which is part of the Group of Communities in Kurdistan, the Kurdistan Democratic Solution Party. But the Party is a really tiny one, the last elections they got only 0,18%. I'm actually a bit confused by this. Why are the military arms of the KCK in Iraq so strong but the political one really negligible? And another thing; Currently, the KCK-affiliated militias, which liberated Sinjar are going to attack Tal Afar. This city is mostly populated by Turcomans, a minority of Iraq which was persecuted like the Kurds but which also doesn't have really good relations with them. Do you think, a kind of Turcoman-communalist militia will be founded or will the enmity continue?

Oh, and one last thing: If you don't mind I'd remove some of my text here, it's really much. :D--Ermanarich (talk) 16:29, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm very busy at the moment and for the next five weeks. This answer is very late, and so will probably the next ones. I see your point, but the problem is that the last time the U.S. attacked in the Middle East on the ground was the Iraq war. The result of this waar was amongst others the rise of Daesh. Even if you ignore the fact that the USA create a total political mess in the land they conquer, there's still the thing that Assad would never let the USA just one feet into Syria. And so does Russia. And Panama papers... Well, what can I say there. It makes me incredibly angry, even if it's just the top of the Iceberg. But the politicians won't change anything. Really frustrating thing. I personally would declare any organisation which is involved in such affairs as a terrorist organisation. And Furthermore I would sanction the tax havens.--Ermanarich (talk) 19:58, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula

added a link pointing to Jaar

Fall of Zinjibar and Jaar

added a link pointing to Jaar

Insurgency in the Maghreb (2002–present)

added a link pointing to Algerian

Jund al-Khilafah

added a link pointing to Algerian

Sana'a governorate campaign (2015-present)

added a link pointing to Amran

Yemeni Civil War (2015–present)

added a link pointing to Jaar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:25, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ideology and source about Popular resistance[edit]

Hi Have you got source about Popular resistance ? Regards. --Panam2014 (talk) 19:06, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the same as the popular committees and popular resistance populaire.La resistance was known as the popular committees until 2015, when the southern movement joined popular resistance. There are pro houthi popular committees. You should create two or three article. Panam2014 (talk) 22:45, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We must not confuse the 2015 southern resistance and the 2014 southern resistance who is the armed brand of the southern Movement. The three articles could be called popular resistance, popular committees and popular committees (pro Houthi faction). Panam2014 (talk) 23:07, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have found two arabic articles. here and here. Regards. Panam2014 (talk) 09:29, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have sources that say some members of the Popular Resistance support Ali Saleh as the group was created in 2015? --Panam2014 (talk) 12:34, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. Have you got pro Houthi source about the pro Houthi popular committees ? --Panam2014 (talk) 15:12, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Create the article battle of Amran would be nice too . Indeed , it is this battle that led to the capture of Sanaa . There is a documentary interest of al Jazeera ( the road to Sanaa/black box ) . --Panam2014 (talk) 18:16, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

After watching what is your opinion about the subject ? Panam2014 (talk) 21:12, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The documentary has been helpful to write the article Battle of Amran ? Also, have you found other sources of popular resistance ? --Panam2014 (talk) 20:26, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, create an article on the battle Amran is very important as it is this battle that led to the Civil War. --Panam2014 (talk) 13:06, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Al-Qaeda in Sinai Peninsula, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaza. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aden[edit]

Hi There are no battle in Aden. It is an unrejst. I have renamed the article and added that Southern Movement is with AQAP. --Panam2014 (talk) 20:57, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For the article about the popular resistance that you intend to create. So the southern movement is not part of the Popular Resistance as they fight the government? Finally I renamed article . Panam2014 (talk) 00:16, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could you create the article about popular resistance ? --Panam2014 (talk) 16:50, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could you create article about popular resistance ? Panam2014 (talk) 20:16, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could you create article about Houthi resistance ? Regards. --Panam2014 (talk) 12:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Have you got a source ? Regards.--Panam2014 (talk) 18:08, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Battle for port Midi[edit]

@Tiseptiko:Hey & thanks for your contribution in Battle of Port Midi, but there is a problem, the [image] is not on Midi, it's on Attan in the capital Sana'a, for a clear picture you can have a look at this video that shows the moment when Saudi bomb his Attan.^[1] 967BYTES (Contact) 21:11, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "‪Bombing Faj Attan in Sana'a, Yemen‬‏ - YouTube". Retrieved 2016-04-08.

Orphaned non-free image File:Saudi airstrikes in port Midi.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Saudi airstrikes in port Midi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Al-Qada Emirate in Yemen[edit]

Hello Tiseptiko,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Al-Qada Emirate in Yemen for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:24, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Al-Qaeda Emirate in Yemen for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Al-Qaeda Emirate in Yemen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Qaeda Emirate in Yemen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 19:27, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa (talk) 22:24, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tiseptiko (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think that i have to unblocked because i trying to help Wikipedia by creating new articles and editing a lot, and if i have violated the Wikipedia policy, i haven't do it in a bad reason

Decline reason:

Please lodge a new unblock request explaining your understanding of why copying and pasting content into Wikipedia is not allowed. MER-C 12:35, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tiseptiko (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe that i should by unblocked because the block is not more necessary because i understand for what i blocked for, and i will not do it again, and i will respect the Wikipedia copyright policy from now on

Decline reason:

All you have done is paraphrase point two of WP:GAB, you haven't actually demonstrated, through your own words, that you understand how your edits were violations of our copyright policies. It's also concerning that you write "i will respect the Wikipedia copyright policy from now on". What stopped you from respecting the policy after reading the many copyright notices above? I'm unconvinced.Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:49, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your unblock request does not answer MER-C's question. Please explain in your own words why copying and pasting content into Wikipedia is not allowed. — Diannaa (talk) 21:45, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Tiseptiko (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will explain in my own works that i have understated that i have not respected the Wikipedia policy, because in some of the articles i have edited, i was just copying the text from the sources an pasted on the Wikipedia article. When i mean from now on, i mean that now that i have read again the Wikipedia policy, i fully understand that is wrong to copying and pasting the writings and the text of the others sources without the source's holder permeation. I and the other Wikipedia editors, we have to wrote the articles in our own words using multiple sources. What i mean is that is no need to block my anymore because i have understated the reason that the Wikipedia administrators blocked my profile.

Accept reason:

I am now unblocking your account, as you have said that you now understand our copyright policy and intend to follow it in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 13:55, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: I think this latest unblock request captures the essence of our copyright policy, so would you be happy for me to unblock? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:39, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am now unblocking your account, as you have said that you now understand our copyright policy and intend to follow it in the future. I will be monitoring your contributions daily, and any further copyright violations will result in your being re-blocked. If that happens, it's extremely unlikely that you would be un-blocked a second time. Make sure that all content you add to the encyclopedia is written in your own words. Good luck and happy editing. — Diannaa (talk) 13:55, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comeback[edit]

Hi I congratulate you for your comeback. Also, have you got source for pro Houthi resistance ? --Panam2014 (talk) 18:13, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:6 killed 7 injured in 31 of Jan, in Sana'a.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:6 killed 7 injured in 31 of Jan, in Sana'a.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Cryptic 06:48, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa (talk) 03:07, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tiseptiko (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry Diannaa, but you have some issues with me? What exactly i have done wrong? Can you please explain my how to wrote these"For example, a vase held by two demons represents peace, the red coral branch inside wealth, and the fungi at the demon’s waist longevity. The five bats refer to the five blessings: longevity, wealth, health, virtue, and a graceful death. Zhong, holding his jade sceptre, looks up into the sky as if calling to the bats" in my own words? This is exactly the description of the image. Then how i can write something else? Anyway, i accept that the first time that i blocked i was wrong, and you wave done good that you blocked my, but now, i don't see something that i have done wrong. I mean this is the image, the five bats and the two demons, and it cannot explained in other words. Please don't block me for everything its seems wrong to you. I you believe that i have done wrong, message my and i will fix it. Its no need to block me.

Decline reason:

You were blocked for copyright violations. This is not your first block for them, we have tried to explain this to you. Either you are unable or unwilling to follow our rules regarding copyright. HighInBC ^{Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}}} 14:53, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Tiseptiko. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Abdelmalek Droukdel in Maghreb.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Abdelmalek Droukdel in Maghreb.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AQAP in Mukalla.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AQAP in Mukalla.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aden governor, Jaafar Mohammed Saad killed.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aden governor, Jaafar Mohammed Saad killed.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:People look at destroyed headquarters of Houthi party in Amran, in July 12, 2014.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:People look at destroyed headquarters of Houthi party in Amran, in July 12, 2014.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Train2104 (t • c) 23:20, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tiseptiko (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to change my username for personal reasons. I understand my wrongdoings in wikipedia after the past two years. I will sincerely not violate any more rules of wikipedia if i get unblocked.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 00:07, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tiseptiko (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understood that i was at fault, because i used material that was copyrighted streight to wikipedia, while we should use the material as a reference, and not just copy and paste them. We should describe the content of the source with our own words. Copy pasting materials that are copyrighted violate the wikipedia policy about copyrights, causing trouble for wikipedia, and the original author, and is not a way that we should use the material, because doing this, will also cause the article to lose neutrality. Having understood my past errors, i ask that my 2 and a half years block gets reviewed, in hopes of convincing the admins that i sincerely, not only understand the faulted way i used my editing, but i want to make contributions that will instead help at improving wikipedia, helping the project of wikipedia into spreading the knowledge inte the world for free.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficiently convincing for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 14:30, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock discussion[edit]

You demonstrated understanding of copyright before and were reblocked 3 months later for copy right problems. Please explain why this time is going to be different.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:45, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Its not the same. I was younger then, and i did not comprehend entirely what could be a copyright violation, and what could be not. Now i undertand my wrongdoings. You may be speaking about the article of the Zong qui painting. When i created the article, i almost completely copy the material of the source, thinking that since the feature of the painting was plain, it could not be ecplained otherwise anyway, so used the few lines of the source. It was my wrong, since again, it could be called a copyright vilation, even if the feature was plain and simple. I could describe the material in my own words, but i thought that copying the text could not stand as a copyriht violation. If i left something out, please point it, and i will anwser. (talk) 06:38, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ISIL fighters in Afghanistan, with their commander, Abu Rashid in the meddle.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ISIL fighters in Afghanistan, with their commander, Abu Rashid in the meddle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "‪Bombing Faj Attan in Sana'a, Yemen‬‏ - YouTube". Retrieved 2016-04-08.

[1]