User talk:Tipaloo

Welcome![edit]

Hi Tipaloo! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Ludicrous (talk) 20:35, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@LudicrousSengir Thank you I am happy to be here and helping. Thank you for the warm regards. Tipaloo (talk) 20:40, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't mention it! Keep up the great edits. :) Ludicrous (talk) 20:42, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Bobby Braddock.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Bobby Braddock.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:32, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Bobby Braddock.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Bobby Braddock.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:34, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Bobby Braddock Album Cover.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Bobby Braddock Album Cover.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:03, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Tipaloo! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! —Ganesha811 (talk) 15:12, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Iron Flame (October 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:TOOSOON - Add some independent book reviews after the book has been released.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Iron Flame and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 17:26, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tipaloo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GoingBatty (talk) 17:26, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rebecca Yarros (November 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

So far, she's only got the one book, so it's more appropriate to have an article on Fourth Wing. (Right now, her book meets WP:NBOOK, but she doesn't meet WP:NBIO herself.) The sequel is coming out soon so you could alternatively hang onto this until then, provided that Iron Flame is also notable - authors with multiple notable books do tend to have their own articles. Or, you could write an article on The Empyrean, which would be about both books and the TV series.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rebecca Yarros and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 18:30, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rebecca Yarros[edit]

Hi, Tipaloo! Thank you for creating the article for Rebecca Yarros! I have significantly expanded it based on her whole collection of work and accepted it at Articles for Creation. It's out in the wild now! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:49, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! If you're a reader I hope you're copy of Iron Flame was not delayed. Thanks-a-bunch! Tipaloo (talk) 14:48, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Iron Flame has been accepted[edit]

Iron Flame, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:08, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crescent City (fantasy series) has been accepted[edit]

Crescent City (fantasy series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 19:39, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Plot summaries for books[edit]

Hi there, I see you tried to tone down the PR-like language on Crescent City (fantasy series). (Thanks!) I wanted to point out, additionally, that you don't need to be worried about leaving "suspense" or avoiding spoilers. If you only want to write a brief sentence that explains the topic of a book, sure, "Character 1 and Character 2 team up to fight the Big Evil Thing after it Does Something Terrible" is fine. But one of the most useful things you can write in a wikipedia article on a book/series is what actually happens in the story. You can go ahead and tell us how it ends. -- asilvering (talk) 03:55, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! I was using other fantasy book pages as a reference, so I appreciate the help! Thanks-a-bunch! Tipaloo (talk) 16:29, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, so many of our articles on fantasy books are really out of date when it comes to Wikipedia standards (we used to have spoiler tags and everything!). If you're interested in cleaning up fantasy/SF articles in general, there's loads to do and it would be a big help! There are several related wikiprojects you might be interested in: WP:FANTASY, WP:SF, WP:BOOKS, and WP:NOVELS. -- asilvering (talk) 18:36, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add to this, I reverted your addition of a plot summary to Iron Flame. The summary you added was lifted directly from the linked source. That's copyright infringement, and is definitely not allowed. See WP:Copypaste for guidelines. Darkage7 _[Talk] 04:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reading it again, I notice you did at least attempt to "change it up", so my apologies. However, it still isn't acceptable. Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing is another good rule to read. Darkage7 _[Talk] 05:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]