User talk:Theready199

November 2013[edit]

Do not add personal information about other contributors to Wikipedia. Wikipedia operates on the principle that every contributor has the right to remain completely anonymous. Posting personal information about a user is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's harassment policy. Wikipedia policy on this issue is strictly enforced and your edits have been reverted and/or suppressed, not least because such information can appear on web searches. Wikipedia's privacy policy is there to protect the privacy of every user, including you. Persistently adding personal information about other contributors may result in you being blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 13:03, 5 November 2013 (UTC) ---[reply]

I did not post his personal information against Wikipedia rules. The only "personal information" I posted as defined by Wikipedia was his name, which he had already posted. Posting someone's name after they have already posted it is NOT in violation of Wikipedia rules. Please read the rules yourself before you revert posts made on their basis. Theready199 (talk) 18:38, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Indoor_cycling. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. L Faraone 22:18, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

LFaroane, the editor, MrOllie, is deleting my explanation of the edits on the Talk page as well. He is obstructing any kind of discussion of how to reach a neutral page by blocking both the edits and the reasoning/discussion behind the edits. If anyone should be banned from editing, it is him based off of that behavior. If he has an issue with my edits to the indoor cycling page, he needs to bring those issues up on the Talk page and have a discussion. He has not done so. Instead, he simply continued to 'revert' with no discussion. I am carefully following all of Wikipedia's rules and simply trying to create a neutral viewpoint on the indoor cycling page and explain my reasoning behind doing so.Theready199 (talk) 07:45, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]