User talk:TheJJJunk/Archive 2

WikiProject Wikify: July Newsletter and August Drive

EdwardsBot (talk) 21:33, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikify and the future of wikification

Hi! There is an ongoing proposal at the project talkpage concerning the future of wikification, including possible deprecation of the {{wikify}} template which is being discussed at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 August 10. Your input would be greatly appreciated!

You are receiving this message because you are listed as an active member of the wikify project. To update your status, go here.

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:51, 12 August 2012 (UTC) on behalf of Project Wikify

Czechoslovak declaration of independence Reversion

You reverted the change I made, and I looked to see why, and it was most likely because i messed up the Ref link. The link as should be http://scholar.harvard.edu/armitage/files/sahj.pdf and i had left off the .pdf on accident and put a | at the end of the sahj part, leading to a dead link. If you have a problem with the accuracy of the change, in the paper its cited with: ‘The Declaration of Independence of the Czechoslovak Nation’ (26 Oct. 1918), in G.J. Kovtun, The Czechoslovak Declaration of Independence: A History of the Document (Washington, DC, 1985), 46-8. If you choose to revert it back, you will have to edit it to correct my mistakes, or you can give me the go ahead and I can do try it again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manofgun (talk • contribs) 22:02, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Alright, I have added the information & reference to the article. Thanks, JJJ (talk) 01:27, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. When you recently edited AKIRA, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages fixed links pointing to the disambiguation pages Shizuoka and Iwata. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:50, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Blue Roofs

Hi

Apologies, but i am somewhat of a novice. Are you part of Wikipedia?? You recently deleted a link to a CIBSE article on the above page (20 Aug) and i am curious what was wrong with it

thanks

Carl — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.127.28.73 (talk) 16:56, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

If you check the External links section of the article, you will see that I did not delete the link, but merely moved it to that section. Also, I am a part of Wikipedia, and anyone can be a part of Wikipedia, as it is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit. See Wikipedia:About for more information. -- JJJ (talk) 17:19, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Ah, I see. Thank you for responding — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.183.128.75 (talk) 21:14, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

New editor retention project

Hi, I'm Gtwfan52. I see you are a relatively new editor just like myself. May I make a couple suggestions? If you have technical or style type questions, a great place to go for answers is Teahouse. Also, I took a look at some of the interactions you have had with others and if you feel up to it, you may want to check out the WikiProject Editor Retention. It is a place where editors get together and brainstorm on how to keep good editors like yourself hanging around Wikipedia. You interact well with people. It would be great if you might use that talent to help keep good editors here. Gtwfan52 (talk) 01:15, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

List of Governors of Massachusetts

Hi TheJJJunk,

While I was remaking the List of Governors of Massachusetts page, I though it would be a good idea to take the Commonwealth of Massachusetts section, and make it into its own article, similar to List of colonial governors of Massachusetts, but named: List of commonwealth governors of Massachusetts. The page is very long, and I feel if it were broken up, it would do a better job of conveying information without overwhelming readers. Sorry if this really isn't your schtick, you were just the first person to edit the page after I did (and it seems you know your way around Wikipedia). Tell me what you thing, thanks. Grammarxxx talk 1:17 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello Grammarxxx. I looked over the article, and here's what I think. The title of the article is List of Governors of Massachusetts, and I believe that the purpose of the article is to list all of the governors of the state of Massachusetts, after it had become a state. The reason that the List of colonial governors of Massachusetts is a seperate article is because these men were governors of Massachusetts before its statehood. If you move the list of governors to the article you wish to create, i.e. List of commonwealth governors of Massachusetts, then there would be no purpose for the already existing article. There would be no List in List of Governors of Massachusetts. Considering that the colonial governors have already been separated from the commonwealth governors, I would recommend leaving the list where it is. But at the same time, remember that this is only my personal opinion, and you may proceed as you please.

-- JJJ (talk) 03:56, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Chaorapper‎

Generally when a CSD is removed by a ANON user, it is replaced if the criteria the CSD is contesting is not met. This way the article does not have to go through the AfD process. The AfD would probably be bypassed as a speedy. reddogsix (talk) 02:46, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

biff rose citation edits

hey will you do what you did a couple days ago to the biff rose page. You cleaned up and fixed the references and citations. appreciate it, friendo Flowerdoodle — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flowerdoodle (talk • contribs) 04:30, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

BLP requires reliable third party sources

I have reverted your edit to Kent Whealy which removed valid sources and reinserted controversial content about a living person with links to primary sources and non reliable sources. content about living persons requires the highest level and quality of sources. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:07, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Please both of you take part in the BLPN discussion. What's wrong with the Chelsea Green Publishing book? Dougweller (talk) 16:10, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

I'd missed the electronic copy of a letter, clearly not a RS, sorry about that, glad it's gone. Dougweller (talk) 16:12, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

I began editing this article to fix vandalism, and do not have specific knowledge of the subject or source. I trust your judgement, and you have proven that the source was not reliable. My only further comment is to look at http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2011/07/food-ark/siebert-text and add relevant information (if any). This is the main source in the Seed Savers Exchange article. JJJ (talk) 16:24, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. No problem. Dougweller (talk) 16:30, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Alice Englert

We're the only ones who've edited Alice Englert thus far. Through the source I found, I figured the birthyear as either 1994 or 1995. Think we could pinpoint one somehow with more definity? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Futuremoviewriter (talk • contribs) 23:36, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

http://alice-englert.org/about/biography/ states that she was born in 1994. — JJJ (talk) 23:58, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

The source I have is from this past October. They say she's 17. Does it also say her month of birth (full date)? I'm not challenging or questioning you, but how is this a reliable source? I just want to verify is all, no offense. --Futuremoviewriter (talk) 02:21, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

None taken. This source says she's 18. And I have no clue if it's reliable or not, I just found it when I was trying to answer your question. — JJJ (talk) 02:41, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Maybe she's turning 18 before this month ends, but without an actual date, there's no way of knowing for sure. I'm maybe more inclined to believe the website then the article, but I don't know. See if you can figure it out and then let me know. Plus, try helping me figure out Shanley Caswell too please. Thanks. --Futuremoviewriter (talk) 03:54, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

One source (which was blocked by the spam filter so which probably isn't reliable) says that she's 18 and was written about her at AFI 2012, which took place early November this year, and this source says she is 18 and was born in 1994. This source: http://www.interviewmagazine.com/film/alice-englert/ which I assume you are talking about, says she is 17, but was written in April. So maybe she turned 18 somewhere between April and November.

As for Shanley Caswell, [1] says that she's 18 and was written in April 2012. Beyond that, I'm not sure. — JJJ (talk) 07:45, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

I think you're right about Alice. The article may have been written before her birthday, which may have probably been sometime between then and now most likely. As for Shanley, she said she was 18 in 2010 filming Detention and she had to be since we see one of her boobs in the movie. Whether she turned 19 in the remaining months of the year or not is uncertain, so I cannot be definitive therefore.--Futuremoviewriter (talk) 21:30, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Right. I'd say just edit the articles with the known data, and if someone disputes it, they will need to provide a reliable source supporting their claim, and thus in a way, will make the determination for us. — JJJ (talk) 23:56, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

Dear jjjunk, I would like to thank you for your last participation . My real name is Abdulla not Abdull.I have been in the USA for 6 years and I noticed that most abdulla (servent of God) called Abdull or Abulla (without d ).I remember there was a famous singer lady Ms. Abdull. I studied at Corpus Christi college and I got admission in 1991 by this name Abdulla and the post graduating certificate. note: next days I will provide the biography page Thank you again Abdulla Astengreen (talk) 15:20, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

You are very welcome. — JJJ (talk) 16:13, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

AWB

I've added you. Dougweller (talk) 15:42, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! — JJJ (talk) 16:11, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bill 115 'Putting Students First Act 2012', you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Progressive Conservative Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:34, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

 Done

Imperial Academia

Do I understand rightly that the page is simply at the wrong title? If so, and if you're unable to move it yourself, just tell me where you want it to go. As an administrator, I can delete pages to facilitate moves, if necessary. Nyttend (talk) 19:29, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

I moved the page, but didn't notice that it was a title of a book, which voids the reason for the move. Then I tried to move it back, but forgot to re-capitalize one of the words. The correct location is America-Lite: How Imperial Academia Dismantled Our Culture (and Ushered in the Obamacrats), and I think I've moved it correctly. — JJJ (talk) 19:34, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Please don't copy/paste content from one title to another simply for the purposes of moving it; it worked out okay here, but for attribution purposes, it won't work when more than one person has contributed to the page. I've now converted the "our" title into a redirect to the "Our" title. Nyttend (talk) 19:38, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Alright, thank you. — JJJ (talk) 19:40, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of America-Lite: How Imperial Academia Dismantled Our Culture (and Ushered in the Obamacrats)

The article America-Lite: How Imperial Academia Dismantled Our Culture (and Ushered in the Obamacrats) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:54, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

I did not create this article. Due to page moves and deletions, original attribution has been lost. Tim bates created this article. — JJJ (talk) 20:17, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

You seem to have done all the name changes by moves rather than copy-and-paste so I am not sure how the original authorship got lost from the history. Now restored. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:57, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Ok Thanks. — JJJ (talk) 23:33, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Car2go

Thanks for the note. The current car2page content is not good. It's outdated and repeatative. For example the business model is mentioned 3 times and so are all the cities. I sugges we change back to a proper structure and add references accordingly. They key sections should be: cities, business model, cars and apps. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.58.230.242 (talk) 22:21, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

If you plan on making major changes to article and don't want passing-through editors like me reverting your changes, I suggest adding the {{In use}} template to the top of the article until you are done. That should preserve your work until you are finished. — JJJ (talk) 22:27, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Sandbox ^__^

This is a sandbox, I also did same mistake and self reverted immediately User:Mezar/sandbox :)--Tito Dutta (talk) 22:47, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

I edited the page to add the 'Name' to the Persondata template to remove the listing on this page. — JJJ (talk) 00:10, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

The reason I removed General Moin U Ahmed and Mr. Rahman

Hello,

Both of these articles are written by supporters of Bangladesh Nationalist Party. They are biased and the source is Amardesh and Nayadignta. These papers are own by Bangladesh Nationalist Party and Jamaat-i-Islami. These are biased articles. I request to suspend them until an honest writer writes them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluesapper12 (talk • contribs) 22:56, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

If you have an issue with referenced content, I recommend starting a discussion on the articles' talk pages, here and here. — JJJ (talk) 00:17, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Abusing me in Wikipedia

I am working for wikipedia for some years. I have contributed with many articles. I am not anybody's agent. I am an author and former university teacher. I questioned the neutral stance about those articles. Now some users are saying that they will punish me. Please convey this message to them:

" Listen you thieves of Bangladesh Nationalist Party, I do not give a damn about Moien U Ahmed. I only care about the truth. Interpol is searching for corrupt BNP leaders." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluesapper12 (talk • contribs) 02:03, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

This comment has inflamed my involvement in your inquiry at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. — JJJ (talk) 14:29, 26 November 2012 (UTC)