User talk:Terricam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 2019[edit]

Information icon Please do not assume ownership of articles as you did at St.John Church of God in Christ. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. creffett (talk) 01:06, 25 June 2019 (UTC) please stop attacking me. i am not speaking to anyone anymore about st john church of god in christ or any other article. i don't appreciate the treatment of these moderators or the way they are handling this. please leave me alone. you are harassing me.[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Do not mass move articles just because you created them, you do not WP:OWN them and many others have made significant contributions to them. If you feel they should be deleted, take it to WP:AFD or if you have content concerns, discuss them on the talk page. Praxidicae (talk) 15:35, 25 June 2019 (UTC) Terricam (talk) 04:03, 26 June 2019 (UTC) i did not assume ownership. i stated that i created the template, which i did. and that i was the only person that had contributed so far, which is true. i also stated i did not own it, it is public information. i have no problem with positive contributions. i have an issue with moderators claiming somehow i have a personal connection with the page or am advertising for myself or anyone else as this is not true. that is what i spoke about. not ownership. please stop accusing me of vandalism, i have done no such thing. if you wish to edit delete or remove a page and have a legitimate reason to do so, that is fine but please stop slandering my credibility in the process. if you are going to allow edits, please give editors time to properly edit before accusing them of vandalism and threatening them.[reply]

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as St. John, Florida, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:18, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Terricam (talk) 03:59, 26 June 2019 (UTC)hello, this is a community in florida. the page is not inappropriate. i simply moved it to a draft for a moment. i was going to edit it. i moved it yesterday. it had been previously posted as a stub. this page was introduced in 2010. it is not a newly introduced page to wikipedia. there is no reason to mark it for deletion. please review pages properly before making false vandalism accusations against other users. thank you[reply]

Nomination of St. John, Florida for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article St. John, Florida is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. John, Florida until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 11:39, 26 June 2019 (UTC) Terricam (talk) 07:49, 27 June 2019 (UTC) why notify me?? after the slew of false accusations and threats against me personally and professionally without reason or merit, i don't have any concern for what goes on here. and what's the point in editing a page if you're simply going to delete it? why bother?[reply]