User talk:Taz On The Free Encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hi Taz On The Free Encyclopedia! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Jprg1966 ^(talk) 18:57, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:SosMula[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:SosMula, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sohom (talk) 20:09, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SosMula (September 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sohom Datta were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SosMula and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sohom (talk) 20:25, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Taz On The Free Encyclopedia! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sohom (talk) 20:25, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of KEKMA FORUM[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on KEKMA FORUM requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Deauthorized. ^(talk) 18:38, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I may have tagged this too quickly, so my apologies for that. If you want to, you can create a draft article and someone else can take a look at it. Deauthorized. ^(talk) 19:13, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Short Description edits[edit]

I see you have been adding Short Descriptions to several articles. While there is still plenty of opportunity for them in the appropriate places, I would like to draw your attention to their purpose, which is to provide supplemental information to an article's title in various listings. In particular:

The description should be short. A goal is to have the most significant information in the first 40 characters.
It is superfluous if it merely states information obvious from the article's title. "A short description is not a definition".
If an editor has used the keyword none, that would have been an intentional addition, and if you want to change it (or make other significant changes) you should gain consensus on the article's Talk page.

The complete set of guidelines is laid out at Wikipedia:Short description. I realize there is a lot to learn about Wikipedia's conventions, which is why we encourage new editors to make simple content changes at first. Please don't be discouraged. David Brooks (talk) 14:54, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm SamX. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Gender neutrality in English seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please read the previous message dated to October 2nd. — SamX [talk · contribs] 20:02, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What did I do that was not impartial? Taz On The Free Encyclopedia (talk) 20:21, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. I've given it a bit more thought and I agree that your edit was neutral, but it still wasn't a helpful change to the short description. The article's title is detailed enough that it {{short description|none}} is probably the best approach, and including "you" in the short description is not appropriate. Thanks, — SamX [talk · contribs] 20:26, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I meant "you" as in "one", in that description. Taz On The Free Encyclopedia (talk) 17:19, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Jews for Jesus did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Erp (talk) 01:53, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kekma Forum for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kekma Forum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kekma Forum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

NotAGenious (talk) 10:51, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]