User talk:Tarheel95/March 2009

Thank you

Hello Tarheel, thanks for the barnstar! :-) BarretBonden (talk) 21:06, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

One Tree Hill

excuse me, I did nothing of the sort, i deleted nothing what so ever, i only moved the cast into the correct order it's supposed to be, the way they are credited --Hithere2008 (talk) 12:21, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Calgary

You undid my edit to the Calgary Alberta page regarding the gay community, claiming it did not improve the quality of the article. Well I disagree as I am sure many of the members of the gay community would. The article on Toronto has an similarly sized paragraph about the gay community there, also listed under culture. Please explain why you feel that does not improve the article, by mentioned the cultural contributions of a segment of the population which represents more of the populatoin, than some of the ethnic groups in the city...

Your recent RfA

I am sorry, but I have closed your Request for adminship prematurely. Simply put, you only have 600 edits on Wikipedia; while your edit count isn't the only determining factor, and numerous people have their own personal standards by which they judge RfA candidates, this particular RfA was all but assured of not passing.

I am sorry about this, and I hope you don't take it personally. If you continue to contribute to the project in a positive fashion, I am confident that you would be able to submit a successful RfA in the future. You may wish to consider applying foran evaluation by other Wikipedia editors for feedback on how to obtain the necessary experience. Once you are ready to request adminship again, there is a great admin coaching program available, as well as a guide to requests for adminship.

If you have any other questions about becoming an administrator, please don't hesitate to ask me. Good luck! –Juliancolton ^{TropicalCyclone} 01:33, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Edits

The edits were vandalism, I was simply trying to revert them, but I must have messed up. Thanks for fixing it ;).--71.106.222.144 (talk) 00:54, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Louvre

Hello Tarheel95! I notice you are part of the anti-vandalism unit. Can I ask you please to be much more diligent in your reversions. In your recent reversion of vandalism to Louvre you noticed a couple of minor problems, and then reverted to the work of a nameless vandal who had deleted an entire paragraph, and a heading. The next editor after you fixed the missing heading, and but left the paragraph missing because they didn't follow on.

The problem with this is, people notice your reversion and presume the job to be done done. You have effectively (though unintentionally) disguised the vandal's work. Casual readers and students notice rude words, but it can sometimes take months for a missing section to be noticed. It only happens when someone who knows the subject very well (or who wrote the article) bothers to check the entire article.

If you are uncertain about whether a removal was done intentionally as part of a serious edit, then you can locate section and stick it on the talk page with a question to that effect. That way, when you reverse other vandalism, editors are alerted that something else might need sorting out. Amandajm (talk) 11:43, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

I ll never forget what you did last summer

In regard to this article, I would have deleted it if I had found the previous deletion discussion under which it had been deleted before, but I couldn't find it. If you can identify it, please let me know. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:42, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Serv-On

I think that speedy is going to fail due to the fact that he did have a #1 album in 1999.Live and Die 4 Hip Hop (talk) 19:12, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Nut free candy

Hi there. It looks like we had the same ideas about saving that one title. I guess this works now. De728631(talk) 00:07, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Hmm, the link doesn't work for me, I get a 404. Anyhow, judging from the title alone I guess it was speedied.De728631 (talk) 00:17, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Exercise Induced Collapse

Just a friendly note on Exercise Induced Collapse. I declined the speedy deletion request because there's plenty of context to identify the subject. If you think this still needs to go, prod or AfD would be the way.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:08, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

CSD

Hi. When nominating articles for speedy deletion, you should leave the content in place (unless it deserves to be removed – see WP:CBLANK) after adding the {{db}} template to the top of the article. Cheers! Cycle~ (talk) 20:34, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

C02 cycle

Hi, I've redirected this page which you recently speedied to Carbon cycle, in future, when marking articles, please check if you could redirect it somewhere. Thanks - Kingpin13 (talk) 14:48, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Jeff Weiss

Twinkle did not nominate the page correctly. You might want to try again. MrKIA11 (talk) 15:32, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

• I tried a second time to no avail. Should I do it manually? T-95 (talk) 15:38, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Just create Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Weiss, I'll do the rest. MrKIA11 (talk) 15:39, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

With {{subst:afd2|pg=Jeff Weiss|cat=B|text=''Your reason for deletion''}}. MrKIA11 (talk) 15:42, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

 Done - Good to go. MrKIA11 (talk) 15:45, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Spam??

What is your excuse for applying a spam tag to Roman Town House, Dorchester? Almost all Grade I listed buildings are notable and in any case, what was spammy about the text? — RHaworth (Talk |contribs) 19:35, 27 March 2009 (UTC)