User talk:Tanner Swett
I am not new to Wikipedia; this is a new account, as I wanted a fresh start. So if you're here to welcome me to the project, thanks, but I already feel welcome! :) --Tanner Swett (talk) 06:52, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
--thanks for fixing my spelling @ crying. English isn't my first language + I'm dyslectic + I was tired. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.45.160.39 (talk) 18:14, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Proposed deletions of redirects[edit]
Hi. The reason I proposed that deletion is that the title Android (mobile device platform) is unlikely to be typed in the search area. It contains a long description within the parentheses. Wo.luren (talk) 13:58, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
- I see. The thing is, though, Android (mobile device platform) has many incoming links, so deleting it would be harmful. --Tanner Swett (talk) 18:18, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer![edit]
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. All the Best, Mifter (talk) 13:31, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Spin Bowling[edit]
Can you look at what I wrote on the discussion page and re-assess the situation? I have a whole pile of sources but I simply think its bad practice to put a separate reference every time a word is used. Thanks 188.221.246.173 (talk) 22:40, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
When you say "have a copy of 'The Bowler's Art', what do you mean exactly? I have a hard copy here on the table next to me, and there is an amazon page about it [[1]] that rates it as an authoritative source, but as copyrighted material, the contents are not available online. I have no reason be unfriendly about this; but the previous editors refused to even discuss my changes and simply reverted them, which is very frustrating when you're trying to make improvements. 188.221.246.173 (talk) 23:22, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi tanner, the information I put in the table is already on wikipedia - the teesra is already mentioned and referenced, and a reference to that usage of the word wrong'un is already clearly used on the topspinner page. That was my original point - it seems silly be to asked to provide new references when I'm not actually adding any new material. If you like we can give the whole table a reference to "the bowlers art", that would probably be the cleanest way. If you revert the page to my last change I will add the reference. Thanks 188.221.246.173 (talk) 22:24, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Tanner Swett. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Tanner Swett. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Affect vs effect[edit]
http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/affect-versus-effect In this case, "affect" was correct. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:21, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Tanner Swett. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Category:Marble games has been nominated for renaming[edit]
Category:Marble games has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. QuietCicada (talk) 03:01, 7 August 2023 (UTC)