User talk:Tank Designer

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Tank Designer! Thank you for your contributions. I am Demiurge1000 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! --Demiurge1000 (talk) 10:35, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:47, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your most recent question[edit]

TD,

Here's the answer I was assembling to your most recent tank question on the ref desk:

To edit a previous question, find it on the page and click the "[edit]" link to the right of the header. I would suggest the following revisions to your conclusions:

For the first, tanks remain a useful option for offensive operations. They are not necessary, as can be easily demonstrated via any modern offensive that didn't use them. Depending on the operation, they may even be a hindrance.
For the second, only if you mean strictly man-portable anti-tank weapons. Vehicular (tanks) and airborne (attack helicopters) anti-tank weapons absolutely have offensive capabilities to match their defensive ones. I'd still question "mainly" in the infantry case -- mostly for a discussion of "mainly intended for" vs "mainly used for".
For the third, yes. Note also that a major area of research is active anti-missile defense (i.e. shooting down the anti-tank missile before it reaches the tank). Does that really constitute "armor"? I don't know, but it certainly plays into the discussion of whether tanks remain viable on the battlefield into the future.
For the last, tanks probably aren't vanishing in the near future, but that doesn't guarantee that they will be "the main weapon". As noted in prior discussions, tanks haven't played a primary role in Afghanistan over the past 10 years. — Lomn 14:34, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011[edit]

Please do not remove content without explanation, as you did at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science --Guy Macon (talk) 12:53, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science. Your edits have been reverted or removed.~~

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.

If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. --Guy Macon (talk) 14:41, 1 February 2013 (UTC) ^{Struck out; It did not occur to me that the deletions might be formatting errors. --Guy Macon (talk) 15:19, 1 February 2013 (UTC)}[reply]

Seems a bit harsh - I hardly think he's involved in a content dispute about your views on coffee or your right to post them at the reference desk.

Tank Designer, whatever you're using to edit is messing up formatting (and also removing a lot of other people's posts). You need to sort that out, and use Show Preview to check the format is correct, before you use Save Page to save the page.

Also, if you have any new questions about tanks, I suggest you start them with a different section title, like "Armour and anti-armour (part 2)" or "Armour and anti-armour (part 3)" and so on. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 15:03, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tank Designer, after reading your recent comment at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science, I need to apologize for assuming that you had deleted content on purpose. I am sorry. --Guy Macon (talk) 15:27, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Was vandalizing my user page also an error? --Guy Macon (talk) 20:55, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:49, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]