User talk:SueCampbellGH

This is SueCampbellGH's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muriel Skeet has been accepted[edit]

Muriel Skeet, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zeromonk (talk) 11:14, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you![edit]

Welcome to wikipedia. Thanks for creating a biography about a brilliant woman. CT55555 (talk) 12:35, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dorothy MacBride Radwanski (August 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Apart from some works authored by the subject, this bio only cites one source, the Herald obit. This is not sufficient to establish notability per WP:GNG. Whether notability via some other route is possible, isn't clear: eg. WP:NACADEMIC (assuming a practising nurse can be considered an academic, which in itself is far from obvious) would confer notability by any of several means, such as (#3) by virtue of her FRCN, but again I'm unsure whether the RCN qualifies as a "highly selective and prestigious scholarly society" etc. In short, if more sources could be found to satisfy GNG, that would undoubtedly be the easiest and safest option. Please also ensure that all material statements are supported by a reliable source. This means, at a bare minimum, that each paragraph should have at least one citation, and each end in one. --

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dorothy MacBride Radwanski and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:29, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SueCampbellGH! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:29, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SueCampbellGH/sandbox2 moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, SueCampbellGH/sandbox2, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 19:00, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks - sorry I had this in the wrong place - it is in a very early draft form and I sent it to the wrong place! But thank you for looking at it anyway. SueCampbellGH (talk) 19:26, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry and sorry if the template was understood a bit rough. Its perfectly ok and in past happened to me similar as wellParadise Chronicle (talk) 19:29, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please create sandboxes in userspace[edit]

Hello. Please prefix articles in progress with User:SueCampbellGH. The MediaWiki software needs the User: prefix to determine where a page is located. You can access your sandbox at User:SueCampbellGH/sandbox3. Thank you, Silikonz💬 21:34, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for sorting this for me SueCampbellGH (talk) 21:46, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Just keep in mind next time Silikonz💬 21:51, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023[edit]

Thanks for contributing to the article Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 14:11, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright and Wikipedia[edit]

Hello SueCampbellGH! Your additions to Charlotte Regina Kratz have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's elegibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Significa liberdade (talk) 00:48, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

Thanks for contributing to the article Western Infirmary. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 21:46, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestions and support. SueCampbellGH (talk) 08:38, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of nurses who died in World War I[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of nurses who died in World War I, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:03, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Biographies of women[edit]

Hi there, SueCampbellGH, and thank you for writing biographies of several nurses. If you intend to continue along these lines, you might find it useful to become a member of WikiProject Women in Red where we are trying to improve coverage of women on Wikipedia. You can sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 13:01, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I have added myself to the WiR list SueCampbellGH (talk) 13:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and welcome to the project. I've taken the liberty of adding the WiR user box to your user page. When creating biographies of women, you might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 10:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red January 2024[edit]

Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296

Online events:

New: Education (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run M & N | Temperance women

Continuing: #1day1woman | Women who died in 2023

Announcement

In 2024 Women in Red also has a one biography a week challenge as part
of the #1day1woman initiative!

Tip of the month:

Check out the new navigation on our Women in Red Project home page.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Ipigott (talk) 10:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red February 2024[edit]

Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298

Online events:

New: Alphabet run O & P | Black women

Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative)

Announcement

Please let other wikiprojects know about our February Black women event.

Tip of the month:

AllAfrica can now be searched on the ProQuest tab at the WP Library.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:11, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red March 2024[edit]

Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301

Online events:

New: Alphabet run Q & R | Art+Feminism | Find Her

Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative)

Announcements

Celebrate Women – All content gender gap events, in every language Wikipedia, in March 2024
Francophone Women★ Writers Fortnight 2024
Feminism and Folklore 2024 Writing Contest

Tip of the month:

When creating a new article, check various spellings, including birth name, married names
and pseudonyms, to be sure an article doesn't already exist.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

March 2024[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more careful when moving articles out of your User space. Make sure that the namespace is appropriate. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just came here to say the same thing, SueCampbellGH. The page SueCampbellGH/sandbox has a surprisingly long deletion log going back a few months. Note that when moving a page, you can simultaneously change the namespace (in the drop-down menu on the left) and the title of the page (the text field on the right). Let me know if you have any questions! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:33, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I appreciate your advice. SueCampbellGH (talk) 07:36, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red April 2024[edit]

Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304

Online events:

New: Alphabet run S & T | Gender studies | Health

Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative)

Announcements

The second round of "One biography a week" begins in April as part of #1day1woman.

Tip of the month:

If you run into technical problems, you might find help on our Tools and technical support page

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Glasgow Victoria Infirmary, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 19:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for inserting the sources. Dormskirk (talk) 06:38, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the prompt! SueCampbellGH (talk) 06:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red May 2024[edit]

Women in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307

Online events:

New: Press women | Alphabet run U, V & W | Central and Eastern Europe

Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative)

Announcements from other communities

Wikimedia CEE Spring 2024 - contest with certificates of participation and prizes
The Wikipedia Library: #1Lib1Ref - May 15th to June 5th

Tip of the month:

Use open-access references wherever possible, but a paywalled reliable source
is better than none, particularly for biographies of living people.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 06:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red June 2024[edit]

Women in Red | June 2024, Volume 10, Issue 6, Numbers 293, 294, 308, 309, 310

Online events:

New: LGBTQ+ women | Wiki Loves Pride | Women in Music | Alphabet run X, Y & Z

Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative)

Announcements from other communities

Women in Green Good Article Edit-a-thon June 2024 - Going Back in Time
The Wikipedia Library: #1Lib1Ref - May 15th to June 5th

Tip of the month:

Find a Grave is NOT a reliable source (as it is user-generated content). It can be used
to look for biographical clues.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 07:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hi SueCampbellGH. Thank you for your work on Eileen Rees. Another editor, Broc, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this very nice page! Unfortunately, I had to remove a large chunk of the content as it was a copyright violation. Please avoid copy-pasting material from your sources.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Broc}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Broc (talk) 13:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]