User talk:Speedy Koba

I see you haven't been welcomed yet, so here is your standard-issue-inpersonal-form-letter-welcome-message, hey at least it has some usefull links

Welcome!

Hello, Speedy Koba, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Sherool (talk) 00:34, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Image then Article you deleted[edit]

Well first of all I didn't delete it, I merely asked Waxxywilly77 (is that another acount you use, all the images was uploaded by that acount) what he intended to do with all those letter scans since they where not in an article (guess it was deleted by then). If you check the deletion log you will see that it was deleted by Steel359, the supplied reason (CSD A7) is shorthand for speedy deletion criterea #7 for articles, or in other words a bio that does not asert the significanse or importance of it's subject. Most of the images where deleted because they where tagged with license tags that indicated they where not free content ("permission for Wikipedia only" or "non-commercial use only" and such).

Nothing deleted on Wikipedia is truly gone though, it can be undeleted and viewed by administrators. It's "bad form" to outright undo another admin's deletions though so I suggest you either explain to Steel359 why Mr Nelson is indeed notable and ask him to undelete it himself, or (since he indicates that he is busy in real life for a while on his page) take it to Wikipedia:Deletion review and ask for an undeletion there, again supply as much info as you can on why he is notable and how you intend to improve the aticle when undeleted (note that a common outcome is to undelete an article and list it on "articles for deletion" instead, but that way at least you get a chance to explain why it should not be (re-)deleted). --Sherool (talk) 00:30, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of William E. Nelson[edit]

I have nominated William E. Nelson, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William E. Nelson. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Plastikspork (talk) 00:42, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of William E. Nelson for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William E. Nelson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William E. Nelson (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --David Tornheim (talk) 09:59, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]