User talk:Spaceshuttle88
September 2023[edit]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Keira Knightley, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. again, per the edit note Meters (talk) 17:24, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kate Beckinsale. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Again, per the edit note. Meters (talk) 17:25, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Please stop edit warring [1], at Jimmy Kimmel and elsewhere, or you are likely to have your editing privileges revoked. See WP:EW. Thank you. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 20:22, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- You need to stop giving this man those protection privileges. You're literally trying to punish me for telling the truth, and no matter how many times you try to silence me, I will keep on making edits to reflect that he spends most of his time bashing conservatives and masquerading as "political satire". So either tell your editors to stop the warring THEY started, or I will keep on engaging in it against your wishes. Have a nice day. Spaceshuttle88 (talk) 20:32, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- I have no interest in giving "protection" to Jimmy Kimmel, and he certainly does not need it from me! I'm interested in protecting Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wikipedia goes by the core policy of verifiability. If reliable sources do not identify him as a notable political commentator, then Wikipedia also does not. Your preferred version of the article appears to be based on your own analysis, and it is not in keeping with the MOS:ROLEBIO guideline. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 21:31, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- O.K., so what reliable sources do you have that prove he is NOT a notable political commentator? Can you prove it? Spaceshuttle88 (talk) 01:04, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- That's not how it works. No one is going to attempt to prove a negative to you. Your recent edit summary: "I’m gonna keep on re-adding this until it stops" - this is the definition of edit warring. The proper place for this discussion is the article's talk page, this is exactly why talk pages exist. Beach drifter (talk) 22:36, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- O.K., so what reliable sources do you have that prove he is NOT a notable political commentator? Can you prove it? Spaceshuttle88 (talk) 01:04, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- I have no interest in giving "protection" to Jimmy Kimmel, and he certainly does not need it from me! I'm interested in protecting Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wikipedia goes by the core policy of verifiability. If reliable sources do not identify him as a notable political commentator, then Wikipedia also does not. Your preferred version of the article appears to be based on your own analysis, and it is not in keeping with the MOS:ROLEBIO guideline. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 21:31, 8 December 2023 (UTC)