User talk:Souravdas1998/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Your submission at Articles for creation: Kendriya Vidyalaya No.1 Kanchrapara (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Narutolovehinata5 was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:11, 4 December 2017 (UTC)


Teahouse logo
Hello! Souravdas1998, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:11, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Kendriya Vidyalaya No.1 Kanchrapara

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Kendriya Vidyalaya No.1 Kanchrapara, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:11, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. I don't know what you are asking me, you have the draft here already . there are problems that you need to address before moving it to article space

  • it does not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the school claims or interviewing its management. Most of your text was unreferenced, or sourced only to the school. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
  • You only tell us about the courses you offer and some sport, which looks promotional. You don't tell us how many students there are or how they are organised. It would also help if you gave age ranges, since not all countries have the same class numbers as India
  • If you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for the school, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the school you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Souravdas1998. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Souravdas1998|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

I made these minor edits Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:02, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

User:Jimfbleak, I modified the article on the basis of the above points suggested by you. Now you can have a look on that Draft:Kendriya Vidyalaya No.1 Kanchrapara. After seeing, suggest me some more flaws, if presentSouravdas1998 (talk) 13:04, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
I made some more tweaks, including where you need clarification for non-Indian readers. You should put the numbers of staff and students in the text as well as the infobox. Ideally, some more third-party references would help, but may noT be available Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:22, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kendriya Vidyalaya No.1 Kanchrapara has been accepted

Kendriya Vidyalaya No.1 Kanchrapara, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Winged Blades Godric 05:21, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Help regarding patrols. Reply

Thank you for your question on my Talk Page. As requested, I am replying here on yours. You asked me to clarify my detailed answer to you to this question at the Teahouse. Here is the follow-up question you then asked me: Hi, respected Nick Moyes, I asked you few days ago something regarding patrols in Teahouse. You talked something about bots. I didn't understand it then. Can you please again make me understand about that thing. My doubt is that my statistic page shows that I have Zero patrols, but I have edited many random articles and corrected many typos, as I am a Random page patroller and typo patroller.

I did not mention bots at all. You can ignore them. They are not relevant to your question. My reply tried to tell you that you are wrong to believe the type of edits you have been making will be counted as a "Patrol". See your details edit count here. It correctly shows your Patrol count as Zero. I can see from your edit history that you have been doing useful work to fix typos and other errors, but this kind of patrolling is completely different from New Page Patrolling, which does get counted separately. As I tried to explain, every one of your edits is listed at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Souravdas1998, and these show the type of work you have been doing. You have done nothing wrong - all your edits are there to be seen, and I'm delighted you are now leaving clear edit summaries with every one. (You could probably try to mark more of them as minor edits, too) I hope this extra explanation makes sense. Regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 13:47, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

To expand on Nick's reply, if you click on the zero patrol count number it links to your patrol count, which in turn has a wiklink from "patrolled" to WP:New pages patrol/patrolled pages, where it explains that the pages concerned are those patrolled by reviewers. And to expand on another point in Nick's reply, if you're not sure of the definition of a minor edit it is at Help:Minor edit. --David Biddulph (talk) 14:19, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank You Nick Moyes and David Biddulph for your immediate help. I am trying to understand this. It may take some time to understand fully as I am new. I will seek more help from you in future, Souravdas1998 (talk) 16:13, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India)

Greetings,

It is being planned to organize Wikigraphists Bootcamp in India, please fill out the survey form to help the organizers. Your responses will help organizers understand what level of demand there is for the event (how many people in your community think it is important that the event happens). At the end of the day, the participants will turn out to have knowledge to create drawings, illustrations, diagrams, maps, graphs, bar charts etc. and get to know to how to tune the images to meet the QI and FP criteria. For more information and link to survey form, please visit Talk:Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:46, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Animal Aid Unlimited (January 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lee Vilenski was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Nearly there. There are 3 decent articles in the references pointing towards notoriety. However, the other two are primary, or a duplicate. If there is more, then I'll accept.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 11:05, 16

Your submission at Articles for creation: Animal Aid Unlimited has been accepted

Animal Aid Unlimited, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:12, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Animal Aid Unlimited) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Animal Aid Unlimited, Souravdas1998!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

You need to be careful not to close paraphrase your sources, instead writing things in your own words. Some sentences in the article are copy/pasted from this source. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:30, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Supporting Indian Wikipedia Program resource distribution

In 2017 - 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India chapter (WMIN) and user groups will pilot a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program (Code name: Project Tiger) will:

(a) Support active and experienced Wikipedia editors through the donation of laptops and stipends for internet access and
(b) Sponsor a language-based contest that aims to address existing Wikipedia content gaps.

The objective of the program is to provide laptops and internet stipends for existing editors who need support to contribute more actively. 50 basic model Acer Chromebooks and Internet stipends for 100 contributors are available for distribution. Provided resources are the sole property of the beneficiaries and should be used for the betterment of the movement.

If you're an active Wikimedian, and interested to receive support from this project, please apply. It will take around 10 minutes of your time, and will ask descriptive questions about your contribution to Indic Wikimedia projects.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

regarding article creation

Hello Souravdas1998 this is muskanjain. I need your help in creating articles. I am mostly focusing of star kids of hindi and marathi film industry. I have written down few names, but have little citations of bollywood websites. Can you pls help me with creating articles that won't be declined? I would be glad if you assist me. Awaiting reply Muskanjain (talk) 07:25, 8 February 2018 (UTC)muskanjain Muskanjain (talk) 07:25, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Replied on talk page of Muskanjain--SouravDas1998t@lk to me? 03:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

new article

Hey Souravdas1998 this is muskanjain. I have created my first draft of Mr. Rohit KaduDeshmukh. He is a star kid. As I told, I am working on star kids' articles and I have a list of few of them. So this is the first one! I have added few references. Pls Check the article and help me so that it won't get declined! For me my first article is imp, as it will encourage me to work over more on other articles too! Link to the draft is; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Rohit_KaduDeshmukh pls go through the draft. Awaiting reply Muskanjain (talk) 07:21, 9 February 2018 (UTC)muskanjain 


Muskanjain (talk) 07:21, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
@Muskanjain:Hi! Will it be Rohit Kadu Deshmukh or Rohit KaduDeshmukh, as you have written? And remember, always be patient, if you hastily submit it for review, then it may be rejected and marked for speedy deletion. It is now looking quite good, but it needs more work. Don't worry, carry on your work. If there are any mistakes, I will rectify and modify it. I will give more touch-ups soon. Thanks--SouravDas1998t@lk to me? 08:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Souravdas1998 Hie!! It's Rohit KaduDeshmukh, the way I have written. I have added maximum references to the article! Can you help me to add more details? And what more should I add before submitting the article? Or should I submit? Pls guide me sourav Muskanjain (talk) 10:13, 9 February 2018 (UTC)muskanjain
@Muskanjain:, don't submit it now, it will be rejected, I will soon(today) perform touch-up, after that you may submit.SouravDas1998t@lk to me? 11:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Souravdas1998 Ok sourav, pls inform me once you make edits and improve the article so that I can then submit it.. awaiting reply Muskanjain (talk) 13:59, 9 February 2018 (UTC)muskanjain
Okay @Muskanjain:! Till then, you can start work on creating other articles(draft) you want to create. You can work parallely if you want.SouravDas1998t@lk to me? 15:17, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Ok Souravdas1998 but till when should I expect this article to be ready for submission? Because as you know, first article is Imp for encouraging to write n contribute more. Anyways, I'll start with other articles simultaneously. But pls do help me and let me know when should I submit my first article? Muskanjain (talk) 16:52, 9 February 2018 (UTC)muskanjain
Dear, @Muskanjain:, I have reviewed the draft, and found that you have only 3 primary sources, which you added repeatedly again and again in inline citations. Actually, you have to reuse a reference if you want to provide citations multiple time. I will suggest you to go through here for more experience, as knowledge comes with experience. I made some edits, but I would like that you must yourself rectify the citation issue, since it's your first article, and you will learn something new yourself. One more tip, if you want to directly publish the article, without any review, then click the red link Rohit KaduDeshmukh, paste all the contents of your draft there, and directly publish the article without undergoing any review, though, it will be reviewed by a New Page Reviewer, but your article will be published directly. If the reviewer find anything missing, he/she will give you suggestion, and if your article doesn't follow the policies of Wikipedia (according to the reviewer), then it might be marked for Speedy Deletion.(After clicking red link, you may see a message that the article is deleted,since somebody tried to create it earlier, there, another red link will be present. Click it. If you don't see the above message, ignore my words in this parenthesis). Don't hesitate to message me, I will always help you out!--SouravDas1998t@lk to me? 22:25, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Sneakbo Edit and Removal

I believe I concisely and sufficiently explained the removal and edit.

Two entries under legal disputes were describing the same event so I combined them under the same title. Whereas before they were under two separate titles/sub-section. This is unnecessary and bulky.

I removed the section under 'suspected Gang affiliation'. This is not fact and text is merely based upon speculation and thus this "information" as well as not being a legal dispute non-factual opinion-based information has no place on a wikipedia article. As incorrect and negative information on a person in the public domain this could be classed deformation of character. The references used to describe this information themselves do not have reputable sources and make claims with no evidence. Platform51 (talk) 12:22, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Okay! @Platform51:, I have restored your version of Sneakbo. Cheers! And keep editing Wikipedia. I will be always ready for your help in future. Thanks--SouravDas1998t@lk to me? 06:40, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Archiving

Hello - my apologies for the delay in replying to your request for help on talk page archiving. (Archiving is not my strong point, I must be honest). I see you've been experimenting a bit. I think you are right to avoid monthly archives - really only of use on very busy pages. Stick with keeping quite a few past discussions on your main talk page, rather than archiving after a few weeks. I think 90 days is sensible for a not hugely active editor like yourself, so leaving the last 30 to 60 discussions visible to everyone is a good idea. I could have a play around with your archives (and would probably suggest moving content from the monthly archives into the Archive 1 you've created.) If I make a mess of things you could easily revert anything I do. Let me know. Nick Moyes (talk) 22:21, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

@Nick Moyes:, you are free to edit my pages/subpages. I consider you my mentor. Just do whatever you suggested above, and make it fully automated, so that I don't have to mess with archiving in future. Thanks--SouravDas1998t@lk to me? 06:10, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Well! What a mess I made of sorting that out for you! I've now added one automatic updating function which should archive after 30 days (I prefer longer myself), however it will not archive if there are fewer than five threads on your page. The archive has a 50k byte limit, which you could increase if you wish. Let me know how it goes. Once it's working OK you can request a delete of the unwanted archive pages, by blanking the contents and then adding {{db-u1}} to it. Leave it for a bit to see how you get on. You can see all your subpages here. Sorry if I've made lots of pointless edits to your pages - hope it's all sorted out now. Regards Nick Moyes (talk) 11:48, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Thanks! @Nick Moyes:, you are too good. Thanks again for helping. Love from  India--SouravDas1998t@lk to me? 16:27, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

There were huge no. of links and the dialogue box was also there saying that there is a huge no. of links. So, I removed most of them.

Some of them were like this:- (example) Kendrya Vidyalaya Saltlake No.1, Kolkata, Wst Bengal and another link was given for Kolkata and Wst Bengal separately. Which is not necessary.

In easy words এই নিবন্ধে প্রচুর সংখ্যক লিঙ্ক এবং উদ্ধৃতি রয়েছে। Saha 08:53, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Replied on the talk page of Arnabsaha2212

A cup of coffee for you!

And about those redlinks, hardly anyone is going to create articles for KVs. Wikipedia was launched 17 years ago, and yesterday I was trying to add some stuff about my school (KV Cossipore). So the redlinks are hardly going to become bluelinks. 
Saha 09:01, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

What I edited in the battle of Chinsurah?

I forgot. 

Saha 19:48, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Saha 19:49, 1 March 2018 (UTC)Arnabsaha2212

The differences between previous revision and your edits are here on The Battle of Chinsurah. And yes, your signature here is not up to the mark(as per Wikipedia policies). Remember to sign by adding four tildes(~~~~). See more about Signatures.Thanks!--SouravDas1998t@lk to me? 20:03, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

কি হবে স্বাক্ষর করে? Saha 12:39, 2 March 2018 (UTC)Arnabsaha2212 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arnabsaha2212 (talk • contribs)

Project Tiger Writing Contest

In 2017 – 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India Chapter (WMIN) and user groups from India, are piloting a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program will (a) support active and experienced Wikipedia editors through the donation of laptops and stipends for internet access and (b) sponsor a language-based contest that aims to address existing Wikipedia content gaps.

Phase (a) has been completed, during which active contributors were awarded laptops and internet stipends. Phase (b) will be a contest in which editors will come together and develop a writing contest focused on content gaps. Each month three individual prizes will be awarded to each community based on their contribution for the month. The prizes worth 3,000 INR, 2000 INR, and 1,000 INR, will be awarded to the top contributors for each month. The contest started at March 1, 2018, 0:00, and will end at May 31, 2018, 23:59 (IST). Useful links are as follows:

Looking forward your participation, all the best. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) at 22:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC).

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Souravdas1998. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Beeblebrox (talk) 19:12, 23 January 2019 (UTC)


Some baklava for you!

দাদা ভালো থাকুন, আবারো বলছি হুমায়ুন আজাদ ভালো কাজ করেননি দাদা, উনি ভালো কাজ করেননি, তার লেখা বই পড়ে দেখুন। Samiha Badda (talk) 12:38, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

দাদা কিছু কথা

@সৌরভ দাদা, হুমায়ুন আজাদ ঢাকা বিশ্ববিদ্যালয়ের একজন অধ্যাপক ছিলেন, ঠিক আছে উনি অনেক মেধাবী ছিলেন, কিন্তু ওনার লেখা বই নারী (১৯৯২) এবং কয়েকটি উপন্যাস যেমনঃ ফালি ফালি করে কাটা চাঁদ (এখানে দেখুন) এবং একটি খুনের স্বপ্ন (দেখুন) দ্বারা বাংলাদেশের মেয়েদেরকে আরো বেশি রক্ষণশীল এবং ছেলেবিদ্বেষী বানিয়ে দিয়েছেন, আপনাদের পশ্চিমবঙ্গে ওনার লেখা বই পাওয়া যায় নিশ্চয়ই, কিনে পড়ে দেখুন না। নারী বইতে সে পুরুষতন্ত্রবাদের বিরোধিতা করেছে, হ্যাঁ ভালো করেছে, তাই বলে সে মেয়েদেরকে পুরুষবিদ্বেষী বানাবে নাকি, বাংলাদেশী অধিকাংশ মেয়েই পুরুষবিদ্বেষী। Samiha Badda (talk) 12:29, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

@Samiha Badda:See, I am not against you. But I am against vandalism, in any articles. I too hate few people, but that doesn't mean that I will vandalize the articles related to them. Do good contributions in Wikipedia. Thanks--SouravDas1998t@lk to me? 12:43, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Souravdas1998. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until 2019-03-02. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~ Amory (u • t • c) 12:21, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of 16 Puppies Killing Case for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 16 Puppies Killing Case is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/16 Puppies Killing Case until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed, Rosguill talk 00:04, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Exotic pet

Please be more careful about what you accept into the Exotic pet article in the future when reviewing pending changes. There has been ongoing vandalism, and the IP whose edits you accepted has been blocked repeatedly for it. Nobody keeps whales as housepets, and lions and penguins are also extremely rare as pets. We can't attempt to list every possible animal that has ever been kept in captivity. Please see the discussion on the Talk page of that article and the article's edit history. —BarrelProof (talk) 03:19, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks @BarrelProof: for pointing out the mistake. I am sincerely admitting the mistake done by me, as I failed to observe the ongoing vandalism. I will try at my best so that I do not commit this mistake again. Thanks again for your kind gesture, which will always be appreciated. SouravDas1998t@lk to me? 14:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of 16 Puppies Killing Case for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 16 Puppies Killing Case is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/16 Puppies Killing Case until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed, Rosguill talk 00:04, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Exotic pet

Please be more careful about what you accept into the Exotic pet article in the future when reviewing pending changes. There has been ongoing vandalism, and the IP whose edits you accepted has been blocked repeatedly for it. Nobody keeps whales as housepets, and lions and penguins are also extremely rare as pets. We can't attempt to list every possible animal that has ever been kept in captivity. Please see the discussion on the Talk page of that article and the article's edit history. —BarrelProof (talk) 03:19, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks @BarrelProof: for pointing out the mistake. I am sincerely admitting the mistake done by me, as I failed to observe the ongoing vandalism. I will try at my best so that I do not commit this mistake again. Thanks again for your kind gesture, which will always be appreciated. SouravDas1998t@lk to me? 14:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject India

Namaste, Souravdas1998. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. As you may know, the old newsletter for WikiProject India ceased circulation in 2010. Now we have re-launched the newsletter in a new way. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Thank you.



Sent by Path slopu on behalf of WikiProject India. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:56, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Souravdas1998/Archive_1&oldid=1045550875"