User talk:Sinofdreams

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]

Delivered: 00:35, 5 January 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Dude[edit]

Hey why did you steal my signature designs? Kalajan€₣ 15:32, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You should've asked me, I'm a rather good at it, tell me what colors you wan't. Kalajan€₣ 19:10, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How's this: Sin Of Dreams •™• ?

Glad you like it. Kalajan€₣ 22:09, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey you might not know this but this isn't allowed here (that way of speaking, ((rudely))); let me see... There's a thing called WP:NPA, read it and you'll understand, just stay civil. Cheers! Kalajan€₣ 22:42, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't a personal attack. §imon_K^S_K 23:58, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No but it was rude and sarcastic. Kalajan€₣ 13:52, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it wasn't the most polite compliment, but that doesn't mean you should not tell him to read a rule that he has not broken. §imon_K^S_K 19:06, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was adverting him that it somewhat entered WP:NPA. And he has been rude to me more than once. Kalajan€₣ 19:59, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing wrong with what he said. A personal attack is "You're retarded" or "STFU, you ******* *** ** ******......" He asked me to give him a list, so I give him a list. I don't how it enters WP:NPA if it wasn't a personal attack. It wasn't that rude either. The most important thing is, if I take it personally. If I don't, then you should just drop it. §imon_K^S_K 20:34, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well he could use the advice for a near future. Kalajan€₣ 22:09, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For what? If he attacks someone? He has been civil so far. He responded calmly to your accusation of stealing sigs. Do you think he needs this? §imon_K^S_K 22:36, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes precisely, and the rudeness and sarcasm - If it wasn't an WP:NPA what was it? cause I don't really find it should be allowed either. Kalajan€₣ 14:19, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What was it? A simple question that did not show any rudeness or sarcasm. I don't understand why you keep on responding to this. Drop it. ₰imon_K^S_K 00:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay you're having a fit and there's no reason to; he can use the information for future reference in cases that someone is acting stupidly and you feel like saying on his talk page: YOU RETARD! Kalajan€₣ 23:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE:[edit]

Sure. [1] Glad I could help. §imon_K^S_K 22:27, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sig[edit]

Please stop making changes to your sig. Your sig looks fine. It's best for you to focus on your mainspace. ₰imon_K^S_K 22:42, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yah I currently don't even which one you're using, for I have many but most of them are designs I made for other people. Kalajan€₣ 23:54, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, Why is there a sig with Kalajan's name bieng directed to your talk page? That can raise many eyebrows, which lead to people thinking you are a sock. I told to focus on mainspace. ₰imon_K^S_K 16:12, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yah I'm removing it. Kalajan€₣ 18:46, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Genesis (2009), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TJ Spyke 21:03, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey[edit]

Whats Up? Colts 1 17:43, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

please don't leave comments on my talk page unless you have a comment about any of my editing k Benton Tigers 17:47, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn't civil, he was just trying to make friends. Colt, if you want friends, go to another part of the woods, here it's useless. Kalajan€₣ 19:12, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kalajan i'm tired of you gettin all own up in my business, Colt i'll reply to u later since i've got to deal with this know-it-all K Benton Tigers 21:29, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay you know tht I would probably report you for this, buut I won't because ur new. and unexperenced, hey, if you want to be uncivil Go and smash up a wall with a sledgehammer! Just Kick it out the shed. Kalajan€₣ 14:28, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Look if you think I'm a not cool boring serious know-it-all you're wrong.Wanna have some laughs? Read this [2]. Kalajan€₣ 19:01, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Genesis (2009), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.

Hey[edit]

Yeah We Cool Hahah Colts 1 17:55, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey thanks a lot man, HBK is precisely my favourite superstar, and DX my favourite tag! Thanks man, did you read the link I sent to you?, remember it's fun for reading, but for copying, I wouldn't do it, I got blocked a few days ago and it was terrible, but it wasn't vandalism, it was edit warring on wwe roster. Kalajan€₣ 18:02, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, do you think you could ask User:Colts1 to leave me alone? Kalajan€₣ 18:06, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks....[edit]

Thanks for the UBX! ₰imon^KSK 20:28, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of World Wrestling Entertainment alumni[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to List of World Wrestling Entertainment alumni has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 22:33, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The WWE Alumni did not have any reliable sources so that is why I deleted it it was not vandilizim. Benton Tigers 00:12, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The edit in question did appear to remove sourced content at List of World Wrestling Entertainment alumni, which was one of the reasons that it appeared to be vandalism. I would also strongly encourage you to complete an edit summary for all edits, especially where content -- sourced or unsourced -- is being removed. A clear edit summary gives all other editors an insight into the purpose of your edit. Alansohn (talk) 04:43, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No Benton wouldn't do that, he's not that type. Kalajan€₣ 13:50, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Colts1[edit]

Please stop adding the fake "you have no new messages" to Colts1 webpage. It's not necessary and continuing to replace it (as you've already done) may eventually be seen as harassment or vandalism. Hazardous Matt 17:56, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey could you do me a favour? Could you sign out and write *Hi Kala* on my talk page? with your account signed-out? Kalajan€₣ 22:04, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No write it with your account signed out, don't sugn in until you do it. Kalajan€₣ 14:31, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, don't do that. Kalajan, if you are trying to make a sockpuppetry accusation, please use the proper channels. --Smashville^talk 17:48, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please Stop[edit]

I notice that you have been told above to stop adding this to User:Colts1's talkpage, yet you continued to do it. This is your one and only warning. Even though Colts1 is blocked indefinitely does not give you the right to harass him. You will be blocked for harassment if you readd the template. --Smashville^talk 02:33, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter[edit]

Delivered: 11:29, 18 January 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Disruption using sockpuppets[edit]

What is the meaning of the account User:KingOreo? Please explain your actions immidiately. --Deskana (talk) 12:59, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When I said immidiately, I meant before making further edits. Barring any explanation for your actions, I will be forced to block you. So please explain. --Deskana (talk) 15:53, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Deskana. You already have User:MarkandBark, and now User:KingOreo. Why do this? To get Kalajan in more trouble? That would make you User:Colts1 too. What do you have against my adoptee? Explain. Simon \\ KSK ^{Yes we can!} 17:48, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abusing multiple accounts. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Smashville^talk 21:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why would this user claim in their unblock that they were not a sock of Sinofdreams when they were blocked for being a sock of Colts1? --Smashville^talk 21:16, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sinofdreams (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm Not A Sock I want To See The Reason I'm A Sock And The Prof That I'm A Sock

Decline reason:

Very obvious checkuser-verified abuse of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 17:27, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked[edit]

Why are you blocked? Shall I unblock you? How? Fiddler96 (talk) 16:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No you can't, you have to be an admin. Listen he didn't really do anything wrong (Sin) with the socks. Multiple accounts are allowed. If he was Colts1 I do mind though. Kalajan€·₣ 15:39, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Regarding The Block Against Sin I Can Assure You He Is not Colts1 Trust Me I Know Sinofdreams And I Will Get Him To Appeal The Block Weaver2009 (talk) 01:59, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

read the block thing on the talk page Weaver2009 (talk) 02:13, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weaver2009 == Sinofdreams, checkuser confirmed. --Deskana (talk) 21:55, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]