User talk:Shmayo/Archive 2
Please do not do edit warring against the sources[edit]
Please do not do edit warring against the sources in the Battle of Mosul (2016–17) article. The source given there in the "Units" section clearly refers to the Nineveh Plain Forces, not to the Nineveh Plain Protection Units. Wikipedia is about facts and sources, not about personal political preference. -- 2A1ZA (talk) 17:24, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry, I did not mean that NPF did not participate, what I meant was that NPU are the ones that should be listed under the Iraqi Army, while NPF should be listed under Peshmerga. Shmayo (talk) 17:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- But note that SINA is a biased source. Shmayo (talk) 17:32, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- I am fully aware that SINA is a biased source, just as absolutely everything from Assyrian politics is. If the God of Middle East studies would offer to fulfill one wish of mine, I would ask him/her to create an unbiased professional media source on the Assyrian community in Iraq. -- 2A1ZA (talk) 18:01, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- But note that SINA is a biased source. Shmayo (talk) 17:32, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Lol, hope he does so one day. Regarding NPF and Peshmerga, the first article you linked earlier claimed the NPF is a part of Peshmerga, just to answer your last comment. Shmayo (talk) 18:20, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, that one of all the complex biased sources appears to suggest so that PMF were to some degree integrated into Peshmerga forces. If you feel like putting the NPF into the KRG-affiliated militias, you would at least have to add that source as an additional reference into the article, because otherwise the article and the references given do not fit. However, I am not really convinced that such presentation gives a sincere picture, as the one recent source gives no hint that NPF in the Mosul battle were "commanded by Barzani", rather suggests equal loyalty to Iraq and KRG. -- 2A1ZA (talk) 18:34, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
more sources explaining On the Syrian Goddess[edit]
click the first result, otherwise that page is hidden from viewing --Monochrome_Monitor 16:29, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Which talk page are you referring to?
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Shmayo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Shmayo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Shmayo, Good day. I have reverted your edit on the above page, pls note no heritage/ethnicity in WP:LEAD section - pls see WP:Ethnicity. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:24, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Kingdom of osroene[edit]
The inhabitants of osroene was mainly arameans, greeks and parthians. The king abgar might have been arab. I am not a patriot, l am neutral and open minded. According to simo parpola they had an assyrian identity, now should we trust him? l would say yes because we know that the arameans worshipped mesopotamian gods. And our church fathers accepted both aramean and assyrian for our identity. Now how trustworthy were our church fathers, well, not very much but they could have documents describing the syriac people as arameans or assyrians, but what we know from other historians during this time we have been called both arameans and assyrian, while l mostly accept the assyrian identity because it was our last true empire. But back to my question, do you think that the kingdom of osroene should be written as our kingdom, for mostly they were aramean and other mixes, and other people can say its their kingdom? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nemrud91 (talk • contribs) 21:27, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
April 2021[edit]
Hello, I'm Sennecaster. I noticed that you recently removed content from Chaldean Catholics without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Sennecaster (What now?) 16:29, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |