User talk:Señor Keesh

Welcome![edit]

Hi Señor Keesh! I noticed your contributions to Catalan language and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Throast ^{{{ping}} me!} (talk | contribs) 20:17, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Irish language. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Mutt Lunker (talk) 18:51, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Rsk6400 (talk) 13:56, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Germans. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Rsk6400 (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did at Serbians. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you think that the page should be deleted, please read Wikipedia:How to delete a page. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. FranklinOfNull (talk) 17:25, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Mississippi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You are continuing to edit war, adding links to "United States", when MOS:OL states not to link the names of countries. Please stop your disruptive editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:11, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, ok, sorry Señor Keesh (talk) 18:41, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert your edit. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:58, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But ma'am, one thing that I'm realizing is that I'm seeing the articles of U.S. states in all of those are in the way that I'm editing, meaning that I am putting the right format. Señor Keesh (talk) 19:10, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I all of those, are in the way that I edited, that I "swapped links", quiting the link to Country and putting the link to United States Señor Keesh (talk) 19:11, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No you haven't. You just did it again here, adding a link to "Canada". Please explain yourself. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:43, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’m just adding links in parts where I think that is helpful based on the policies that I know, for example if I edit the section of birth in biographical articles I do not link the country per MOS:GEOLINK just like I did on Jennifer Lopez here, so please ma’am, relax a bit, my intention here is not vandalize, just to fix links and adding helpful things to pages. Señor Keesh (talk) 19:50, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 02:09, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23 How did you figure it out that it was me? Who told you? Did you found it yourself? Tell me Señor Keesh (talk) 02:18, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

haha take big fat l yo no cap + common skill issue + kanye better + ratio + counter-ratio Tommyvercetti098 (talk) 15:41, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]