User talk:Sarastro1/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5

Hutton

I hacked up a Hutton/Compton in 1948 article last year, but didn't uplaod it. May raise a few hackles. Responded re Miler in 48 YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 00:59, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Jardine FAC

I've read through the ongoing discussion and feel reluctant at this point to comment since I know so little about cricket. However, I'll continue to follow the progress of the discussion, and I'll join in if I think I have anything worthwhile to offer. I'll have more time to think about this in a day or two after house guests depart. Best wishes in the meantime. Finetooth (talk) 19:35, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

I've copyedited three sections. Pity Finetooth didn't do a full copyedit :(. I decided to give the FAC reviewers a relief from cricket and lodged Neil Brooks, the Shoaib Akhtar of Australian cricket lol YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 07:33, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
I paused ce for a bit pending content changes YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 02:27, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

I'll try but I make no promises, sorry. My reviewing priority right now is Neil Brooks. Aaroncrick TALK 11:34, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Sarastro1. You have new messages at SGGH's talk page.
Message added 20:17, 1 June 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

S.G.(GH) ping! 20:17, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

I answered all your concerns as best I could. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 01:17, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Herbert Sutcliffe

Hello Sarastro. Thanks very much for the offer and I'll let you know if I need any additional sources. Good luck with the bodyline project. If you ever want to ask me anything, just drop me a line as I have quite a lot of books which cover that era. All the best. ----Jack | talk page 19:36, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Douglas Jardine FAC

If time permits, I'll have a look. JH (talk page) 16:49, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

There's an awful lot there, but I've had a very quick skim. A couple of thoughts:
  • I think the amateur-pro divide that someone mentioned is possibly relevant, in that amateurs - not being dependent on cricket for their livelihood - could perhaps afford to be "braver" in opposing their captain's tactics. According to EW Swanton, some of the professionals, including Ames and Hammond, were opposed to Bodyline but kept quiet in public. I added something about that to the Bodyline article a year or two ago.
  • That brings me on to my second point. If you would like a wider variety of sources, Swanton's chapter on Bodyline in "Sort of a Cricket Person" is excellent.

JH (talk page) 20:27, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

I see your appeal was successful. A ring of Bodyline FAs/GAs should be easily attainable as the main article, Braddles, Tiger, Fingo, Woodfulll, Ponny, Kippax, McCabe are already all FA/GA YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 07:54, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
I see the Tiger's comments on Hutton were useful! You need to avoid "with noun verb+ings" eg "with Hutton scoring" because that will always be picked up at FAC. There are still a few things on Jardine like that. Tony will notice, Giants usually too. It's a canonical no-no on Tony1's copyediting textbooks on his userpage. It's a good investment for any serious writer like you YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 01:28, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
I don't know if you made those last two changes because of my comment, but the verboten thing was the "with NOUN/SUBJECT verb-ing" eg "with Jardine leading". Things such as "with great success" don't fall foul of that so you don't need to kill off all the "with"s YellowMonkey (bananabucket!) 08:48, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Tigers delivered YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 00:52, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Douglas Jardine

Hi Sarastro. I just took a look at this and was a bit surprised by the imagealt (i.e., the caption that appears when you move the mouse across the image in the infobox). I think someone (almost certainly an Aussie) has got away with a spot of mischief for a very long time. ----Jack | talk page 20:10, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer rights

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs (talk) 16:15, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Jardine passes

Great work YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 09:08, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Hear Hear. Aaroncrick TALK 10:20, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Excellent stuff. Well done. Not an easy man to profile. Johnlp (talk) 21:28, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

I didn't realise it was 66k! I would have thought that they would complained if it was more than 55-60 YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 05:41, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Art Ross GA review

Haven't had a chance to say anything yet, but thanks for taking the time to look over the article. I appreciate having someone who knows that they are looking for do that Its even better when its someone unfamiliar with the sport, as I know I tend to use a lot of specific terms without even thinking about it. So once again, thanks. Kaiser matias (talk) 22:23, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Roy Kilner

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Roy Kilner you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. I'd like to add that as an American I know very little about cricket, so forgive me any stupid questions I might ask during the review. :-) Grondemar 15:59, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

I've completed my review and placed the article on hold pending closure of some minor concerns. Thanks for your patience. Link to the review is here. Grondemar 02:07, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks to you and User:YellowMonkey for addressing my concerns above. I've passed GA for the article. Congratulations! Grondemar 16:31, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

AWOL

Where are you? YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 04:47, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

I fixed the GA review for you. I was going to ask you to look at Peter Evans (swimmer) as he was rather lonely. An upgrade of the castle?? YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 07:31, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Yorkshire captaincy crisis of 1927

"Since county cricket began in the 1860s..." It's almost impossible to try to pin down when county cricket began, but it was certainly earlier than the 1860s. Perhaps better to say "Since the early days of county cricket". Also now that the initial sentence has changed, is the citation for that particular page of Barclay's World of Cricket still valid? In the previous version of the lead, I seem to recall that I worded that sentence as I did because I could readily find a citation supporting that wording. BTW, if you haven't already looked at it, there's a Wiki article on amateurism in cricket (unfortunately I can't recall the exact title) that may provide some useful stuff that could be drzwn on. JH (talk page) 17:08, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

It's History of English amateur cricket and I've always meant to finish it sometime. Regards. ----Jack | talk page 19:13, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi Sarastro. Re your mail to me on 5 June, I know you are interested in this article and, now that I've reached a point where I need to take a step back, I wonder if you'd like to peer review it. I'm happy to discuss any questions or issues might arise and if you have any additional sources, I'd be more than happy to see some additional content or views. I have relied mainly on Alan Hill's book as that is the most comprehensive biography available to me but I've tried to get as much as I can from other sources too. All the best. ----Jack | talk page 13:58, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Hutton

Just My Story is pretty feeble. I'm away at present but I'll what I've got and what bon mots there are in Wisden and the Cricketer. All I can say about Hutton is that he was an establishment figure. He towed the line and once knighted virtually forsook Yorkshire. It must be remembered that in 1955 he was a very big star and it was relatively easy, once he got the nod to obtain relatively lucrative positions in industry. He got his son into Repton and obtained a curious hybrid accent. As a cricketer I think it's worth recalling that he was an all-rounder pre-1940. Boycott suffered from the animosity of RA Hutton and a gang of committee men loyal to L Hutton. The Boycott of 1970's was inclined to be a sneering individual but he was constantly undermined by Hutton and Sharpe and to a lesser extent Wilson. GB was a difficult customer but he played in a flawed team - no overseas pro and apart from JHH and Lumb, thin on batting. Without Old the pace attack was only steady. Players like Robinson and Stevenson were loyal to Boycott. Appleyard and co wanted a championship winning team - their blunder was the foolishness of not allowing the team an overseas fast bowler as far as I'm concerned. The players who left were either past it or not good enough (except for Athey)KestevenBullet (talk) 09:22, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Merv

Done YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 03:52, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Jardine

I changed the text here because a) Cambridge followed on in the match, so Jardine only played one innings anyway. b) As it stands the sentence reads that the criticism occured during the innings rather than that pads were used in the innings. Is this your intention? Regards Motmit (talk) 21:04, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi! Thank you for the GA review on this article! I believe I have responded to your concerns. Cheers! Resolute 03:09, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Wally

Another chap wants to edit! Jolly good! As you want to write a lot for FAs, I think you should go to User:tony1 and the read the writing guide. It'sa great investment YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 09:18, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

I put up QCQ. Wally should sail through, unlike his RL relations, lol YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 05:27, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks I replied. rather frutiless YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 01:40, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Seeing as you put so much effort into the article, I hope to have a looky. Are you sure obsessed is the right word to use in the image caption? Aaroncrick TALK 04:15, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Hammond

You're a fine writer. The level of copyediting I'm doing is minimal—I fully trust that any tweaking you do to my tweaking will be well justified. Best, Dan.—DCGeist (talk) 10:18, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Fred

Fred is an interesting subject given his larger than life personality which had such a bearing on his career. I've been thinking what to say about the 1953–54 tour too as I would like a balanced view, though at the moment I'm pondering over the unhappy Yorkshire dressing room of the 1950s. I'm afraid the only book I have on Hutton is the autobiography he wrote in the late forties (forget the title). I've got two autobiographies by Fred and the John Arlott biography but otherwise I'm relying on Wisden, Playfair and the general histories for that tour.

At the moment, the only other Yorkshire player I'm working on is Lord Hawke. I'm interested in developing Jack Hobbs and I still have a lot to do on WG. I did some work on Gary Sobers a long time ago and I'd like to do more. Then there are numerous early players I'd like to develop and, after all that, I'll be open to new ideas.  :-) ----Jack | talk page 18:08, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Cricket articles on WP:SA

Was putting your stuff up for the main page. But Hammond's WR 336 came on April 1, so it can't be used unless you can find some April Fool's trick way of phrasing it. was there any other day he did a WR? Or any other WRs for FC, just put them up providing the article is better than some crap unsourced article already there. Also DYK when Rhodes played his 1,000th, I would like to put that up as well. I don't think YCCC captaincy crisis etc can work as they aren't important enough, eg world-level rarity/first etc, or a regime change in some country or a big military battle. YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 02:20, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

You should not feel guilty about self-serving as replacing an unsourced start-class article with a big B-class or higher article is improving the encyclopedia. And there isn't any nomination process there; only myself and another admin regularly look out for stuff and the page isn't locked for admins only YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 07:54, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

NSW cricketer photo poll

Right, I've set it up. I made some adjustments to my technique, so hopefully it's better. Many thanks again YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 09:07, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Wally Hammond

I'm not tired of cricket, and I'm keeping an eye on the progress of the article at FAC. Since I'm preoccupied with several other projects, I probably won't jump in with comments. With four supports so far and no opposes (if I'm counting correctly), Hammond should be OK. Please let me know I've misjudged the situation. Finetooth (talk) 17:24, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

I'm glad to see the happy result. Congratulations on the FA for Hammond. Finetooth (talk) 17:08, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
Fine on both matters. I recalled that it wasn't you who moved the image to the left during the FAC, so I didn't know if you preferred it there. Since you do, that's good enough for me. Best, Dan.—DCGeist (talk) 20:43, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

The cricket

It was a pleasure. I glanced at your forthcoming projects. Aside from Len Hutton, obviously, I'm very excited about the prospects for Ranji, a fascinating figure. Have you thought about bigger game? I mean bringing cricket itself to FA. I did it with baseballvery satisfying, trust me—and I'd love to play a supporting role in achieving the double. Best, Dan.—DCGeist (talk) 09:59, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Mumblings

I've done Mick Harvey. Is Macca your next FAC? I'm up to Mark Tonelli now... the Akhtar of swimming maybe. Lol... or maybe Miller, a playboy captain :P YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 03:59, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Re:Hungary

Thank you! I see that Wally Hammond has passed FAC - are there any other articles I can take a look at?--Midgrid(talk) 23:18, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

George Macaulay

FAC soon? Looks good at a glance. Aaroncrick TALK 22:58, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Oh, okay. I haven't read the captaincy crisis article yet :) Aaroncrick TALK 23:06, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Hutton and Mac -> Lenny and George YellowMonkey (new photo poll) 02:41, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Actually nothing in common really except a Yorkshire pair YellowMonkey (new photo poll) 02:42, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

done with Tonelli YellowMonkey (new photo poll) 02:41, 16 August 2010 (UTC) Meckiff is back after some remedial action on his bowling technique YellowMonkey (new photo poll) 03:48, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Sandbox2... very exciting :) Aaroncrick TALK 09:15, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

The latter, as it wasn't just involving those two characters. Read the bit you've done, very, very interesting. Such a widespread incident. In a small Australian history book, it even has a chapter on the incident. Aaroncrick TALK 09:21, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Jack Hobbs

By all means work on the Hobbs article if and when you are ready. Don't wait for anyone else.  :-)

If we end up working on it together, it doesn't matter as it will have a wide scope and we could work on different parts. All the best. ----Jack | talk page 18:17, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Old Ebor

I just checked, and Old Ebor doesm't have an article. (Hint. :) JH (talk page) 16:54, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

I do have Jim Kilburn on my "to do" list, but that has additions far more frequently than I actually get around to writing articles, so I'm not likely to get around to him any time soon. But I feel that Old Ebor ought to be done by a genuine follower of Yorkshire rather than a Surrey fan like myself. I have quite a few cricket books, but I think the only one I have that's earlier than 1923 is a scan of The Memorial Biography of WG Grace that someone kindly sent me. I've just checked, and unfortunately it's a text file so obviously doesn't have any pictures. JH (talk page) 21:09, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

I've unearthed Old Ebor's Wisden obituary. I also found a bit about him in EW Swanton's Sort of a Cricket Person. JH (talk page) 09:08, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I agree that it was right to call in Alfred Pullin. I'll see what I can add. JH (talk page) 16:51, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

The two anecdotes, as briefly as I can. First anecdote: During the heyday of Holmes and Sutcliffe, on one occasion he arrived late on the first morning of a game, to find that Yorkshire were batting, with no wickets down and going well. So he sent off his story for the evening paper in instalments as the game developed, by post office messenger and thence by wire, with "some good colourful stuff about yet another fruitful association by the old firm, who following their recent fine form were once more despatching the leather, etcetera". He then received a wire from his editor "saying that the agency score gave Holmes' partner as Sutcliffe, and what about it." It turned out that an injury had kept Sutcliffe from playing and that the left-handed Leyland had opened with Holmes instead, and that Pullin had somehow failed to notice. "... as he was built on somewhat pontifical lines I'll bet the rest of the press-box enjoyed the joke."

Second anecdote: On the Monday of the Lord's Test against Australia, early arrivals found frantic activity out in the middle because "there was a large wet patch on the wicket..." It had been caused by either a leaky hosepipe or a careless groundsman. "Anyway the game was delayed a bit, and here was quite an evening paper story." Pullin had arrived "as was his habit" in good time on this occasion. He sent his piece on the incident off by post office messenger and "sat back complacently to enjoy his scoop while his rivals arriving one by one hurried to try and catch their editions." But then he heard "a messenger with a wire in his hand calling his name. ' 'Ere,' said the lad, 'the postmistress says you must have this back. She can't read a word of it.'" JH (talk page) 09:18, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi Sarastro. I'm afraid I've nothing on Old Ebor that you haven't already found. Sorry, but I'll bear it in mind and let you know if I come across anything. ----Jack | talk page 21:13, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Yorkshire captaincy affair

Hello, Sarastro1. You have new messages at P. S. Burton's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Well done YellowMonkey (new photo poll) 01:31, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Yes, well done. JH (talk page) 17:08, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Re:Reviews

I've left some comments on the FAC page. I've never done a GA review before, but I'll give it a go if you need one!--Midgrid(talk) 20:13, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

"chucker"

Done YellowMonkey (new photo poll) 05:37, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Harvey family/archive1 up and running. Boycs might need your eyes for pre-FAC checking YellowMonkey (new photo poll) 03:08, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Prose concerns

I think Casliber fixed all the prose concerns, i also explained what an option to keep the player is. I can't help with the stats, let the non-baseball reader follow the links, as I can't explain it well, neither as a non-baseball reader like Casliber. I asked one baseball copyeditor for help but he declined it. Also your resume seems impressive, I been offering to nominate people for adminship, as we need more adminstrators, especially article writers who knows wikipedia policies. Are you interested? Thanks Secret account 02:53, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Casliber fixed up the prose even more. Thanks Secret account 14:35, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Think it looks good now... Aaroncrick TALK 23:49, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Lack of books

Well, Toshack didn't have much. lol YellowMonkey (new photo poll) 02:10, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Filatov

Thanks for the comments and guidance, I think they really helped improve the article, regardless of how the nom goes. Canada Hky (talk) 00:45, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Malcolm Jardine

RlevseTalk 12:03, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Hey there, thanks very much for taking the time to do such an extensive review on Daniel Sedin's article. The only item I was still looking to address was the point you brought up in regards to Playing style. I was not, however, able to find anything explaining why he is a proficient goal-scorer or any commentary from Daniel himself. You mentioned you wanted to contact you when I was done tweaking, so I thought I'd let you know here. Cheers. Orlandkurtenbach (talk) 08:47, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Warner-Woodfull leak

We should fatten up the existing 3rd Test article to go with it. I thought I had done the first day's play at least YellowMonkey (new photo poll) 08:42, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

I've re-sent it from March. Oh, you aren't going to partake in the NSw photo poll? :( YellowMonkey (new photo poll) 07:24, 1 September 2010 (UTC)