User talk:Santos.juan

This is Santos.juan's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:René Azurin has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:René Azurin. Thanks! Abdullah Alam (talk) 04:05, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Santos.juan, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Santos.juan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:René Azurin has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:René Azurin. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:49, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: René Azurin (November 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are no sources that go into any detail about Azurin, though the Philstar pieces are decent reviews of his books. Most of the references are simply variations on "... said Azurin", as well as a fair number of PRIMARY pieces by Azurin himself. Please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:René Azurin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 03:46, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: René Azurin (April 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

No changes made to the actual draft since previous decline. Upon re-reviewing the draft, there are large sections of text that have no references. Maybe kill two birds with one stone by adding reliable sources that give verification of the information in the text?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:René Azurin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 15:15, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:René Azurin concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:René Azurin, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:René Azurin[edit]

Hello, Santos.juan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "René Azurin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. GeoffreyT2000 ^{(talk, contribs)} 04:56, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]