User talk:Samx don

Mirrors[edit]

Thanks for contributing to the article Pratapaditya. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 13:39, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

TrangaBellam (talk) 19:45, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

TrangaBellam (talk) 19:46, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Samx don, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Pratapaditya does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! TrangaBellam (talk) 19:46, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been warned of WP:ARBIPA. If you chose to engage in edits like these, the way out will be a topic-ban. TrangaBellam (talk) 19:49, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Talk:Pratapaditya, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. TrangaBellam (talk) 07:28, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 10:25, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify; we cannot stop you from exercising any legal rights you have in your country to use the judicial system there, but you cannot make legal threats on Wikipedia, nor can you edit if you have a legal action underway. You can pursue your grievances in the courts of your country or on Wikipedia using its processes, but not both. To be unblocked, you will need to withdraw any and all legal threats and/or indicate any legal action underway is concluded.331dot (talk) 10:28, 10 September 2021 (UTC) The instructions given by my co-wikipedians is understood by myself , and I am willing to remove the written call for the legal proccedings against a wikipedian that I have gave and hope to not do it again as now I have learn about wikipedia's policy of not making annoncements of filling legal suits against anybody in wikipedia and will not do that in the future.[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Samx don (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The instructions given by my co-wikipedians is understood by myself , and I am willing to remove the written call for the legal proccedings against a wikipedian that I have gave and hope to not do it again as now I have learn about wikipedia's policy of not making annoncements of filling legal suits against anybody in wikipedia and will not do that in the future.I have neither filed any legal action for now neither I wish too . Samx don (talk) 11:59, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's unclear if you plan to continue pursuing legal action and just not announce it, or if you unconditionally and with prejudice withdraw your threat of legal action. You need to be very clear that you will not file legal action and will not threaten to file legal action, or alternatively your legal action is complete. Yamla (talk) 13:19, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A decline is apt. Samx Don is yet to categorically deny the absence of any legal action. TrangaBellam (talk) 12:04, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Samx don, if you have a legal action underway, you cannot edit until it is resolved or otherwise concluded. 331dot (talk) 12:05, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Do not edit the content of declined unblocks. Make a new request with the new content. TrangaBellam (talk) 14:06, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Samx don (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The instructions given by my co-wikipedians is understood by myself , and I am willing to remove the written call for the legal proccedings against a wikipedian that I have gave and hope to not do it again as now I have learn about wikipedia's policy of not making annoncements of filling legal suits against anybody in wikipedia and will not do that in the future.I do not wish to file any legal action nor have I filed any,I will unconditionally remove my threat of legal action as well.Samx don (talk) Samx don (talk) 14:21, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

This satisfies me, so I will remove the block. Please address any grievances you have with discussion and arguments based in Wikipedia guidelines. 331dot (talk) 14:39, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]