User talk:SRBradley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, SRBradley! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 00:21, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Kendama Tricks has been accepted[edit]

List of Kendama Tricks, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Mjs1991 (talk) 03:33, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly advise that List of kendama tricks be moved to the Kendama Wiki[edit]

While your effort in making the list is appreciated, it's not encyclopedic content. That is, it's things that are of interest to players but are too detailed for the general public. I'd hate to see your work go to waste, so can you perhaps copy the code and move this over to a Kendama or Juggling/YoYo external wiki site?

I'm going to "Propose for Deletion" just so the issue can have a fair discussion. If somehow you don't get a chance to copy it before it's deleted, just contact the deleting admin (or any admin) and they can provide you the code to it can be rescued and hosted elsewhere, so it won't be lost.

Thanks again for your work, it's just not in Wikipedia's purview so needs to be somewhere else, though your efforts in helping to add WP:Notable content (things noted by uninvolved observers reporting on kendama) facts would be much appreciated. MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:38, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of kendama tricks[edit]

The article List of kendama tricks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While nice work, the article is not encyclopedia content and would be best hosted on an external kendama/yoyo/juggling site. This is just too much detail from within the kendama community itself, not meeting WP:Notability guidelines for a broader interest.

Our wide readership should go the the Kendama article to get a basic understanding, and detailed info should be kept on specialist kendama wesbites.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:41, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]