User talk:Rubendesign

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Rubendesign, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Legiotex, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Stuartyeates (talk) 00:47, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

El artículo está escrito solamente por una sola persona, la cual soy yo. En el supuesto caso de que parezca un artículo de varias escritores, es porque se ha querido escribir de tal forma que englobase a distintos socios del proyecto europeo. En los cuales si no hubiese sido por el grupo, el proyecto de gran amplitud no se hubiese podido desarrollar. Proyecto que erradica la muerte de personas por contacto con la Legionella. Por lo que se trata de un material muy importante. Rubendesign (talk) 08:40, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Legiotex[edit]

The article Legiotex has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable project. All the sources appear to have been written by the various project partners.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:47, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

El artículo está escrito solamente por una sola persona, la cual soy yo. En el supuesto caso de que parezca un artículo de varias escritores, es porque se ha querido escribir de tal forma que englobase a distintos socios del proyecto europeo. En los cuales si no hubiese sido por el grupo, el proyecto de gran amplitud no se hubiese podido desarrollar. Proyecto que erradica la muerte de personas por contacto con la Legionella. Por lo que se trata de un material muy importante. Rubendesign (talk) 08:44, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

En respuesta al artículo por calificarlo como no notable. Decir que se trata de un proyecto cuyo material es capaz de retener las partículas de Legionella en las instalaciones de centros públicos, evitando el contagio y por tanto enfermedades, asunto que a la gente le parece importante pues estamos hablando de un tema de salud.Rubendesign (talk) 10:07, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Legiotex may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{multiple issues

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:54, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In reply to your post. The issue was that you removed

{{Underlinked|date=June 2013}}
{{Orphan|date=June 2013}}
}}

, breaking the template. Mdann52 (talk) 12:18, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Legiotex[edit]

Hello Rubendesign,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Legiotex for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 11:35, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll give you some advice in the next few days. DGG ( talk ) 05:47, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Legiotex for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Legiotex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legiotex (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:20, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]