User talk:Rspeed
Question[edit]
Why did you remove the indentations from a talk page thread here? VQuakr (talk) 20:22, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- The number of indentations had become and encumbrance, making it difficult to post replies with multiple lines. For the stated reason they were unnecessary anyway, so I removed them. Rob (talk) 20:26, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- It makes the page look a mess, and difficult to follow. Just because two people were discussing (your stated reason) doesn't mean someone else will not join eventually. Please put the indentation back in and don't do that again, per WP:BOTTOMPOST and WP:THREAD. If you need help with outdents, feel free to ask. VQuakr (talk) 23:26, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Hughes H-4 Hercules[edit]
I just reapplied my edit to the Hughes H-4 Hercules (Spruce Goose) article changing "aluminium" in the opening to "aluminum", which got caught up in your revert war over the Scaled Composites Stratolaunch. I'm not getting into that battle; my whole point in editing was it is more appropriate to use U.S. English in an article about a U.S. plane, especially when "aluminum" is used later in the article. Thus, my edit can be the new base if you have to revert again over the Stratolaunch. --RBBrittain (talk) 19:45, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
- After re-reading the key sentence, it said the Spruce Goose "has the largest wingspan of any aircraft in history"; that could be validly challenged as the Stratolaunch is an aircraft, even though it hasn't flown yet (and is far different in design from the Spruce Goose and other large-wingspan planes). Thus, to more properly respect your views while noting the opposing view, I changed the wording to "of any aircraft that has ever flown" and added a hidden note about the Stratolaunch. --RBBrittain (talk) 20:02, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Rspeed. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Rspeed. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)