User talk:Roylenferink

Deleted page: Apache Celix

Hi. The deletion log shows that you deleted Apache Celix for copyright infringement of https://celix.apache.org. As Vice President, Brand Management and a Director of the Apache Software Foundation I can confirm that there was no copyright infringement. https://celix.apache.org is published under the Apache License, version 2 which grants a copyright license for such uses. I therefore ask that the page be re-instated. Thanks. Markt-asf 23:13, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

• Roylenferink can re-create it if they really think the subject is notable. — RHaworth · 22:59, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

• Thanks. I'll pass the message on. Markt-asf 09:32, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Explanation ASF articles

As Mark explained the websites of Apache Projects are licensed under the Apache License, version 2 as well. Therefore creating articles on wikipedia containing text or logos which are used on the Top Level Project its website are allowed to do so.

Copyright problem on Apache Celix

Source code and its accompanying machine-readable documentation is released under license. The webpage from which you are copying is marked as copyright, and does not appear to be released under license. I am nominating for deletion again and another admin will assess. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:00, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

I've changed my mind on the nomination; I think this is a compatible license, and the page says it is released under license. However, attribution is required: What this means is that you have to state that the prose was copied and provide the reader with a link to the compatible license. I have done so for the above article. Please do this in the future so that our readers will be aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. This is a legal requirement and cannot be omitted on any articles you create. Note you cannot copy documents that do not explicitly state they're released under license. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:26, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

---

Hi Diannaa, thanks for noticing and making the change. As I said I have asked for this on the Apache Comdev mailing list and the response can be found here: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev/201803.mbox/%3C82215d35-94a9-e8bb-ed03-c9bf7e43c02a%40apache.org%3E

Next time I'll make sure to explicitly mention the license. Thanks for your help!

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Roylenferink. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Apache Celix, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 07:58, 21 May 2018 (UTC)