User talk:Rose Marie Aragon

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Blake Lively, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Nymf _hideliho! 13:59, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at AN/I regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Island Monkey ^{talk the talk} 15:07, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rose Marie Aragon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How am I sock puppet?? This is my only account. There's gotta be a way to find out I'm not the same person. Check User please. I am sure I have a different IP address so that should clear things up. You made a mistake but that's okay. It happens. Just fix your mistake ASAP please.Rose Marie Aragon (talk) 17:25, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't think so. Care to explain this account you were also operating? Add in the behavioral clues and there's a pretty convincing case that you're evading a block. TN X Man 18:15, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I thought so! When you edit warred with me, I always smelt something weird. Island Monkey ^{talk the talk} 18:17, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

First get a life Island Monkey lmao and Madeline happens to be my friend. We use the same computer but that's all. That's why it makes sense we have similar interests. Anyway did you check user my account??? That would prove I'm not a sock puppet of that trill guy. I mean really calling me a man parading around as a female is insulting. You people seem to think everybody who edits from the same perspective or with the same interest of him is a sock puppet. There's like a conspiracy to keep usher/kobe fans from editing. Your all a bunch of haters!!! I mean really ya take Wikipedia too seriously. And there's no way to stop any of us from editing on Wikipedia. I'm sure that Trill guy has moved by now, has a different computer, and is editing around unnoticed while you falsely block people. Keep Usher/Kobe fans from editing I wanna hate on there success!!! That's you losers motto. At least don't say I'm a sock puppet of some thug.Rose Marie Aragon (talk) 04:40, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rose Marie Aragon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

check user my account!! that will show I have a different IP address and am not a sock puppet of trill. thats why whoever blocked me and denied my un block request didnt deny I have a different IP address!!! I AM NOT A MAN!!! And I am not a sock puppet gosh..... I really debated on whether or not to take time out of my life for this crap

Decline reason:

OK, ma'am. First, if Checkuser says you have the same IP, you have the same Ip, just like if your phone bill says the call lasted 30 minutes, it lasted 30 minutes. Checkuser is right, you are wrong, when it comes to this. Checkuser is the Way, the Truth, and the Light. And just in case you don't understand this, we don't just block people as socks just because they have the same IP ... no, we're not that dense. There are a number of other factors we test for, and I'm really not at liberty to discuss them. Suffice it to say you came back a positive. — Daniel Case (talk) 05:08, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Tnxman - the administrator who rejected your last unblock request - *is* a checkuser. —Jeremy v^_^v ^{Components:V S M} 04:58, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is just crap!!!! You have got to be joking. How in the hell could I come back positive?? How in the hell are you gonna tell me I'm a man??? SHUT THE FUCK UP. GET A FUCKING LIFE. I'M SICK AND TIRED OF BEING NICE TO YOU PRICKS!!!! I bet none of you get pussy. I get dick!!!! I love dick cause Im a girl and I LOVE DICK!!!!Rose Marie Aragon (talk) 14:39, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"I'm not at Liberty to discuss" lmfao that sounds like a bullshit excuse!!!! You dont like my editing style or my opinion and what do you do?? Block me for no reason!!! You beat a dead horse cause your crazy if you think that guy has made over 30 accounts!!!! WTF??? Thats right I did some re search. How many people have you blocked claiming to be him??? lmfao you losers are really stupid and have no lives!!!!GOOD BYE BITCHES.Rose Marie Aragon (talk) 14:49, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked for this behavior above. Daniel Case (talk) 16:14, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]