User talk:Roman Puzin
Welcome![edit]
Hello, Lghtngshdw, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Ymblanter (talk) 08:50, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (Monument to Stepan Razin) has been reviewed![edit]
Thanks for creating Monument to Stepan Razin, Lghtngshdw!
Wikipedia editor DarjeelingTea just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Very nice job!
To reply, leave a comment on DarjeelingTea's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
DarjeelingTea (talk) 20:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of MedCruise[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on MedCruise requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 05:50, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (Rostov State Musical Theater) has been reviewed![edit]
Thanks for creating Rostov State Musical Theater, Lghtngshdw!
Wikipedia editor Hydronium Hydroxide just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
I have copyedited. Please review to ensure I haven't mangled anything. There was also some overly close paraphrasing of the main source, which was probably from the ru-wiki original.
To reply, leave a comment on Hydronium Hydroxide's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 11:04, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Chekhov's short stories[edit]
Hello! Thanks for your recent Chekhov's articles!.. We seem here to be on the same track, so I'd suggest we coordinate our efforts. May I ask what's to expect from you next, so that I'd perhaps revise my own plans? My next entries were supposed to be Peasant Wives, The Grasshopper, In Exile, The Teacher of Literature, Anna on the Neck, Whitebrow, Ariadne, The House with the Mezzanine, Peasants, The Petcheneg, In the Cart, The Man in the Case, Gooseberries, About Love, Ionych, A Doctor's Visit, On Official Duty, At Christmas Time, The Bishop, and Betrothed. And yours?.. In some cases, perhaps, we could join efforts? For "In The Ravine" I certainly have some extension in the pipelines, if you don't mind)... And, while we are at it, my source gives the publication date for "In the Ravine" as January 1900, (No.1, 1900, Zhizn issue). -- Evermore2 (talk) 21:17, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Hello! Well, it really seems that we are doing closely related things :) I don't have any strictly shaped plans, I'm only going to make English translations of everything I can find in https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%91%D0%B8%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BE%D0%B3%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%84%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%90%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%9F%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%B0_%D0%A7%D0%B5%D1%85%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0 article page in Russian. And particullarly there are The Complaints Book, maybe also Children/Kids, Boys, A Story Without a Title, At Home, maybe The Grasshopper and others (there are many of them). I promise I'll try to avoid everything that you listed, at least as long as your plans are not long-term, for I will be working on our topic all this month. And as for In the Ravine and everything else ― any positive edits are always for better, I guess. Lghtngshdw (talk) 07:51, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- Excellent, thank you. Except that At Home (short story) is already there, and the Grasshopper is #2 in my list :) ....Believe it or not, I once wrote here an article (on Pushkin Theatre, if I remember correctly) which I'd written already... two years before (but with slightly different title)!.. Had to boot the whole new text out for a mere REDIRECT. Never felt so stupid. Yet, this trap (of writing the same article twice) is always there... No, my plans here are not long-term, its just that the material for all these pages 'in red' is already prepared, in the form of very rough versions, but my average speed here is 4 Checkhov-related pages per month... So, okay, now I'm sure we won't collide. And even if we do once in a while, lets hope the victim's 'Ravine won't be that deep) Cheers! -- [Actually, you may start The Grasshopper, if you like, and I'll take up... Absolutely hate writing those Plots/Synopses. Publication/Background/Reception feels to me like a much safer ground] -- Evermore2 (talk) 17:32, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- You are welcome! :) Well, The Grasshoper is a rather big article in Russian, and I would like to focus on something shorter for now, to be honest. You see, there is an edit-a-thone organized by Wikimedia Russia (you can check it here and may be even join yourself if you wish), so I'm writing specially for this contest. (and yep, I myself had the same "collision" several times - one time with 87 kb article that I had been working on for two months: now there are two articles that nobody wants to merge). All the best to you! Lghtngshdw (talk) 20:31, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- Well, the days of my ru_wiki prime (2007-2011) are long gone... But curiously, I was born in Taganrog, and spent my first 17 years there, before moving to Moscow... A Chekhov incarnate? If that's not enough, consider this: I spent ten years in this funny cube which sits almost back to back (0,5 km apart) to this precious palace, and both schools in the old times sort of shared the technicals cabinets' house, which in my days were decrepit enough for our teachers to seriously believe those benches still bore spiritual imprints of Chekhov's arse, as it were).... Well, on a more serious note, I have a suggestion. Would you not like perhaps to create a page (in Russian, and in English) Хронология жизни и творчества Антона Чехова / Timeline of Anton Chekhov, using this unfinished gem as a template?.. And, lets say, this for a primary source?.. And I would then go on an on forever expanding its English version, having this extensive version of it in mind? Because, you know, the main article, golden star notwithstanding, is more like a photo album, it just cries for some kind of addendum... Otherwise, I'd suggest translating/expanding ru:Герои Таганрога, although, considering the dire state it's in, this would be a tall order... Anyway, good luck to you in the competition, you're doing pretty well! -- Evermore2 (talk) 20:36, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
- Haha, that's an interesting story :) And why did you left Ruwiki? If it's not a secret, of course...? And thank you for your suggestion, I'll surely consider it. Not sure about Герои Таганрога though, but I think it will be pretty easy to write about it's author himself. --Lghtngshdw (talk) 11:11, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
- There was no particular reason for me to go, except for having gradually come to the conclusion that Ruwiki was nothing but the last - and vast! - resort for despicable nitwit who knows nothing and does even less, except of course, telling other people how articles should be written (or why they should be deleted). In my days there 10% of Ruwiki were authors, 90 - advisers, critics or experimentalists of all sorts. Thought of suggesting a userbox which would read: "This user is useless".... Now I tend to think of it, though, as more of a natural divorce. Me and Ruwiki got sick of each other, and peacefully parted company. Probably since then things there have changed for the better. -- Evermore2 (talk) 21:15, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
- Oh, that's truly terrible indeed... I've been there for almost two years and I can't say that I have encountered such troubles. Only minor misunderstandings maybe, but they weren't that nasty. Perhaps things did change for the better. Lghtngshdw (talk) 07:31, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- There was no particular reason for me to go, except for having gradually come to the conclusion that Ruwiki was nothing but the last - and vast! - resort for despicable nitwit who knows nothing and does even less, except of course, telling other people how articles should be written (or why they should be deleted). In my days there 10% of Ruwiki were authors, 90 - advisers, critics or experimentalists of all sorts. Thought of suggesting a userbox which would read: "This user is useless".... Now I tend to think of it, though, as more of a natural divorce. Me and Ruwiki got sick of each other, and peacefully parted company. Probably since then things there have changed for the better. -- Evermore2 (talk) 21:15, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
- Haha, that's an interesting story :) And why did you left Ruwiki? If it's not a secret, of course...? And thank you for your suggestion, I'll surely consider it. Not sure about Герои Таганрога though, but I think it will be pretty easy to write about it's author himself. --Lghtngshdw (talk) 11:11, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
- Well, the days of my ru_wiki prime (2007-2011) are long gone... But curiously, I was born in Taganrog, and spent my first 17 years there, before moving to Moscow... A Chekhov incarnate? If that's not enough, consider this: I spent ten years in this funny cube which sits almost back to back (0,5 km apart) to this precious palace, and both schools in the old times sort of shared the technicals cabinets' house, which in my days were decrepit enough for our teachers to seriously believe those benches still bore spiritual imprints of Chekhov's arse, as it were).... Well, on a more serious note, I have a suggestion. Would you not like perhaps to create a page (in Russian, and in English) Хронология жизни и творчества Антона Чехова / Timeline of Anton Chekhov, using this unfinished gem as a template?.. And, lets say, this for a primary source?.. And I would then go on an on forever expanding its English version, having this extensive version of it in mind? Because, you know, the main article, golden star notwithstanding, is more like a photo album, it just cries for some kind of addendum... Otherwise, I'd suggest translating/expanding ru:Герои Таганрога, although, considering the dire state it's in, this would be a tall order... Anyway, good luck to you in the competition, you're doing pretty well! -- Evermore2 (talk) 20:36, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
- You are welcome! :) Well, The Grasshoper is a rather big article in Russian, and I would like to focus on something shorter for now, to be honest. You see, there is an edit-a-thone organized by Wikimedia Russia (you can check it here and may be even join yourself if you wish), so I'm writing specially for this contest. (and yep, I myself had the same "collision" several times - one time with 87 kb article that I had been working on for two months: now there are two articles that nobody wants to merge). All the best to you! Lghtngshdw (talk) 20:31, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- Excellent, thank you. Except that At Home (short story) is already there, and the Grasshopper is #2 in my list :) ....Believe it or not, I once wrote here an article (on Pushkin Theatre, if I remember correctly) which I'd written already... two years before (but with slightly different title)!.. Had to boot the whole new text out for a mere REDIRECT. Never felt so stupid. Yet, this trap (of writing the same article twice) is always there... No, my plans here are not long-term, its just that the material for all these pages 'in red' is already prepared, in the form of very rough versions, but my average speed here is 4 Checkhov-related pages per month... So, okay, now I'm sure we won't collide. And even if we do once in a while, lets hope the victim's 'Ravine won't be that deep) Cheers! -- [Actually, you may start The Grasshopper, if you like, and I'll take up... Absolutely hate writing those Plots/Synopses. Publication/Background/Reception feels to me like a much safer ground] -- Evermore2 (talk) 17:32, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (St. George's Church, Novocherkassk) has been reviewed![edit]
Thanks for creating St. George's Church, Novocherkassk, Lghtngshdw!
Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Could you add a citatoin to support the statement about the church being built to commemorate the train disater, please? And it would help if you could give full citations, in English if possible.
To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Nick Moyes (talk) 16:44, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Lghtngshdw. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, St. George's Church (Rostov-on-Don), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- edit the page
- remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}} - save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Onel5969 TT me 14:09, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Lghtngshdw. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, St. Sergius of Radonezh Church (Novocherkassk), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- edit the page
- remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}} - save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Onel5969 TT me 14:14, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Lghtngshdw. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Women in Red[edit]
Hi there, Roman, and welcome to to Women in Red. I hope you can create some biographies of women based on the Russian Wikipedia. You might be interested in our Ten Simple Rules for Creating Women's Biographies. Let me know if ever you need any help or experience any problems. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:05, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Women's History Month 2018 at Women in Red[edit]
  
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Ipigott (talk) 08:05, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
The article Sergey Mayzel has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. WWGB (talk) 05:55, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
April 2018 at Women in Red[edit]
| ||
|
To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or
Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: |
Help request for mapping section titles[edit]
Hi. We (the Research Team at Wikimedia Foundation) are building an algorithm that will align Wikipedia article sections across languages. For improving this algorithm we need the help of multilingual Wikipedia editors to provide true statements to the algorithm. You are contacted because based on your Babel template and/or content translation tool usage you know at least two of the following languages: ar (Arabic), fr (French), ja (Japanese), en (English), es (Spanish), ru (Russian).
(Note: by clicking the links in the following paragraph, you will be taken to Google spreadsheet.) If you'd like to help us with translating a subset of the section titles on or before 2018-05-06, please read and follow the instructions. If you see instructions in another language, please scroll down to find your preferred language. If you have questions about this message, you can contact us via Diego. Thank you! :) --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:49, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
May 2018 at Women in Red[edit]
  
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 23:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Wiki Loves Food[edit]
Hello! After the successful pilot program by Wikimedia India in 2015, Wiki Loves Food (WLF) is happening again in 2018 and this year, it's going International. To make this event a grand success, your direction is key. Please sign up here as a volunteer to bring all the world's food to Wikimedia. Danidamiobi (talk) 02:22, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Women in Red June Editathons[edit]
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A page you started (Anatoly Sobino Park) has been reviewed![edit]
Thanks for creating Anatoly Sobino Park, Roman Puzin!
Wikipedia editor Onel5969 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Nice job on all the Rostov-on-Don's articles.
To reply, leave a comment on Onel5969's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Onel5969 TT me 16:47, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in study[edit]
Hello,
I am E. Whittaker, an intern at Wikimedia with the Scoring Team to create a labeled dataset, and potentially a tool, to help editors deal with incivility when they encounter it on talk pages. A full write-up of the study can be found here: m:Research:Civil_Behavior_Interviews. We are currently recruiting editors to be interviewed about their experiences with incivility on talk pages. Would you be interested in being interviewed? I am contacting you because of your involvement in Wikipedia’s Women in Red project. The interviews should take ~1 hour, and will be conducted over BlueJeans (which does allow interviews to be recorded). If, so, please email me at ewhit@umich.edu in order to schedule an interview.
Thank you Ewitch51 (talk) 21:32, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
July 2018 at Women in Red[edit]
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
- Thanks for becoming a member of Women in Red. If you run into any difficulties or need any assistance, please let me know. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:02, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Alexandrovskaya Square) has been reviewed![edit]
Thanks for creating Alexandrovskaya Square, Roman Puzin!
Wikipedia editor Onel5969 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Nice work on your articles. Please review WP:Precision regarding naming your articles.
To reply, leave a comment on Onel5969's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Onel5969 TT me 23:30, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
August 2018 at Women in Red[edit]
| ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 11:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
September 2018 at Women in Red[edit]
| ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:55, 26 August 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
October 2018 at Women in Red[edit]
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:46, 28 September 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Get ready for November with Women in Red![edit]
Continuing: | ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Roman Puzin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
December 2018 at Women in Red[edit]
Continuing: | ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
December 2018 at Women in Red[edit]
Continuing: | ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
January 2019 at Women in Red[edit]
 January events:
|
February 2019 at Women in Red[edit]
 February events:
|
March 2019 at Women in Red[edit]
   Please join us for these virtual events:
| ||
|
|
April editathons at Women in Red[edit]
April 2019[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
(Please excuse this post if it is a duplicate!)
May you join this month's editathons from WiR![edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June events with WIR[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July events from Women in Red![edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:41, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2019 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 06:46, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2019 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October Events from Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November 2019 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:59, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
December events with WIR[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:44, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
January 2020 at Women in Red[edit]
|
February with Women in Red[edit]
.jpg)
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March 2020 at Women in Red[edit]
 Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April 2020 at Women in Red[edit]
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 15:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2020 at Women in Red[edit]
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2020 at Women in Red[edit]
June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2020 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2020 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September Women in Red edithons[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October editathons from Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November edith-a-thons from Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:49, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
December with Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A New Year With Women in Red![edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
February 2021 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 15:00, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March 2021 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April editathons from Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2021 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2021 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2021 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August Editathons with Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2021 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:31, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October 2021 at Women in Red[edit]
Special event:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 01:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November 2021 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:32, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
December 2021 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
January 2022 Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article Steppe mammoth (exhibit) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication of notability of purported subject (the steppe mammoth excavated in 1964/1965 exhibited at the Azov Museum). Quite a WP:COATRACK; biology of steppe mammoths, fossil exhibited in other museums and another fossil at the Azov museum
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Plantdrew (talk) 20:31, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
February with Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March editathons[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April Editathons from Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2022 at Women in Red[edit]
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 04:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June events from Women in Red[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in July 2022[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2022[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in September 2022[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:37, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2022[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:01, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2022[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:35, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in December 2022[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:56, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red January 2023[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in February 2023[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:29, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2023[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red April 2023[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2023[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:29, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - June 2023[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red July 2023[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red 8th Anniversary[edit]
|
|
Women in Red 8th Anniversary |
| In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2023[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2023 at Women in Red[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Victuallers (talk) 16:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2023[edit]
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - November 2023[edit]
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red December 2023[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red January 2024[edit]
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red February 2024[edit]
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2024[edit]
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red April 2024[edit]
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2024[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red June 2024[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging