User talk:Rmssw

Mystic Force

"Heir Apparent, Part I" premiered on Saturday 1006-07-29 first on ABC Kids, then on Jetix on Toon Disney. Not first on Sunday on Jetix on ABC Family. Ryūlóng 00:20, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

See http://www.tv.com/power-rangers/show/1905/episode_listings.html&season=14 for more details. Ryūlóng 00:22, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Jungle Fury

Leave off anything relating to Gekiranger other than it being the source material. Do not add any sort of trivia based on stuff from Gekiranger. It's only an article because there are multiple sources that support its existance.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 03:49, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

PR:OO

I was the one who edited the Miratrix thing. What do you mean why did I edit her out? I edited her IN >.> Someone else left her out and only put in Kamdor XD Myzou 02:55, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

User Page

Hope you don't mind, adding a redirect to your talk page from you're user page, can edit it at any time, this way, people can know you're an actual person on here ^^; Myzou 13:39, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Jungle Tonfa/Bo

The two are the same weapon, but in different modes. As you can see in this Youtube video.

GekiTonfa Fractyl (talk) 12:02, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

They are never stated to be so. Yes, they appear to be the same weapon, but unless it's specifically stated that the Bo is an alternate version of the Tonfa, we cannot say that they are. As far as the Wikipedia article is concerned, the two weapons are completely unrelated because that is what the show has indicated. Rmssw (talk) 13:53, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Actually, you see the Jungle Bo being formed from two Jungle Tonfa in their debut. Fractyl (talk) 17:25, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

They are never stated to be the Jungle Tonfa and the Bo is never stated to be an alternate form of the Tonfa. It is never said that what the Yellow Ranger uses are ever intended to be Tonfa. The ONLY thing they are said and shown to be are the Jungle Bo. Saying otherwise is speculation and cannot be added to the article. Rmssw (talk) 18:03, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Actually, the episode did showed that Blue & Yellow each perfered using Tonfa & a Bo as they were able to train. Explaining things about a weapon already out is not considered "true speculation", especially if they show the proof. Now the "Bazooka", the "Hammer", the "Fan", and the "Saber" may count as speculation at they were not shown in entirely. Fractyl (talk) 18:09, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Youtube

Hello. I want to know if you are the same Rmssw from Youtube. Here is a link to the channel at: http://www.youtube.com/user/rmssw. Mythdon (talk) 07:42, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Jungle Mace

I second the "Meteor Hammer" due to both fighting style AND the fact that the weapons are based on chinese weaponary.

A Youtube of a Meteor hammer being used. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hOL8juiy1w

PRJF

I'm only updating the profiles. Besides you can't really use "overthrow" in Jellica's profile as she "replaces him", a overthrow is "a change in government, often achieved by force or through a coup". But I can accept it in Grizzaka's case once his profile is set up. Fractyl (talk) 02:35, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

• That's precisely what Camille's intentions were when she revived Jellica. She was overthrowing Carnisoar because his tactics were ruthless and set Dai Shi against her. It doesn't matter what actually happened afterwards. The only reason Jellica was revived was to overthrow Carnisoar. As for updating the profiles, that's fine, but things really should be kept to a minimum in the main article. Only the most important facts should be added. Other facts should be reserved for the dedicated villains article, should there ever be one. Rmssw (talk) 02:43, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Not really, "overthrow" is too stong a word to use, but Camille did intend to replace him with Jellica. Besides, overthrow means a "total takeover", Carnisoar remained a equal to Jellica as both support Dai Shi by evoking the Shadow Guards so he can use their teachings

in his fight. Fractyl (talk) 02:57, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)