User talk:Rexalex52

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

Kariteh 14:31, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A note[edit]

Hello
Just thought I should tell you something. If you're going to make a claim such as Aerith is the heroine of FF7, then you really need to directly cite it. While although she's certainly an integral character to the story, she isn't even a playable character beyond disc one. Her relationship with Cloud is minimized once the truth is revealed (at the same time that Tifa's relationship becomes even more significant). If there were just a single heroine of the game, then it'd be Tifa. But even claiming that would require a verifiable and reliable reference.
The point is, your claim is unsourced, and POV. Please don't add it again without a source, because it'll just get reverted anyways. Bladestorm 22:01, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so I may not have explained very well (sometimes I muddle things up). In order to say that she is the main female protagonist, you need to provide a valid source for that. You're making an assertion; it needs to be supported by a reliable, verifiable source. Bladestorm 00:31, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you are really going to support Tifa as the lead, you are clearly mistaken. I will get a verifiable source. Then will you let it stay?

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sweeneyjudge.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Sweeneyjudge.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 15:20, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Stefanie Wenzel[edit]

A tag has been placed on Stefanie Wenzel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 18:22, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Judy Kuns2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Judy Kuns2.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Stefie-Wenz.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Stefie-Wenz.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:LucyBarker.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:LucyBarker.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 16:45, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Sweeneylucy.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Sweeneylucy.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 17:32, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Natalie Portman[edit]

I'm not sure if you actually checked after you added the listings of awards to the filmography on this page, but the last changes you made were almost entirely composed of redlinks, which means there are no corresponding articles for the awards, or the form of the awards names, that you used. The primary YoungStar awards page has been deleted and it is unlikely it will be recreated, and the Young Artist awards do not have separate pages for each award. It is entirely fine for the awards to be listed as they are already below the filmography. Natalie Portman has been designated a Wikipedia good article and excessive red links should not be added to such articles, nor should they ever be added in such a large number. Thanks. Wildhartlivie (talk) 02:06, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Brenda.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Brenda.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 05:54, 4 July 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 05:54, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

3RR[edit]

You repeated edit warring with two different editors at Natalie Portman has resulted in a WP:3RR violation. This is beign reported to the admins. Please desist from further edit-warring, or you may be blocked. --Tenebrae (talk) 03:42, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have violated the three-revert rule on Natalie Portman. Any administrator may now choose to block your account. In the future, please make an effort to discuss your changes further, instead of edit warring. Tbhotch^™ and © 03:45, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring by violation of the three-revert rule at Natalie Portman. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Courcelles 03:50, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Turpinjohanna.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Turpinjohanna.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:18, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mrs. lovett.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mrs. lovett.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:26, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mrs. lovett.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mrs. lovett.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]