User talk:Renxu350

Welcome!

Hello, Renxu350, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! The New Mikemoral (talk) 00:26, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stop[edit]

Please stop posting these weird stubs until I have a chance to see what the <expletive deleted> you are doing. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 14:53, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. These pages don't belong in article space! Please stop Mayalld (talk) 15:01, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Alison Wheeler's Rail Icons == Curves For Multicolumn Templates[edit]

A tag has been placed on Alison Wheeler's Rail Icons == Curves For Multicolumn Templates requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 15:05, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Alison Wheeler's Rail Icons == Branching Symbols[edit]

A tag has been placed on Alison Wheeler's Rail Icons == Branching Symbols requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 15:06, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wheeling[edit]

All these Alison Wheeler pages are apparently something to do with railways but they absolutely do not belong in the article namespace. Check your contributions for where I have now put them. Please consult Alison Wheeler or someone else involved in railways as to what to do them. But do not even think about putting them in the (Article) namespace. I have unblocked you. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 15:15, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note that User:Renxu350/AlisonW is probably one or two orders of magnitude too complicated. I have not managed to open it on my machine. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 15:24, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not believe it! Despite the above, you promptly create an utterly context free and meaningless stub called Alison Wheeler's Rail Icons. Do you understand what a namespace is? To put it simply: please ensure that any new titles you create in the near future begin with: User:Renxu350/

Please feel free to explain here what you are trying to do. But for the time being do not post anything in the (Article) namespace without the approval of an established editor. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 16:11, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stop[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. Please stop creating reference lists of rail icons in article space Mayalld (talk) 16:07, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Confirm[edit]

Could you please add a note here to confirm that you have read these messages and now understand what a namespace is? — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 16:28, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Block[edit]

After I wrote the above messages you created more ridiculous titles in the (Article) namespace. I have blocked you again but you are still allowed to edit this page. I suggest that you should not be unblocked until you confirm here that you understand about namespaces and agree that your template lists do not belong in the (Article) namespace. Some other hints:

Very little of your stuff has actually been deleted. refer to Special:Contributions/Renxu350 to see where it is. Your most recent edits are lumped together in user:Renxu350/sandbox - use the history to get specific states.
These edits were actually close to vandalism. We do not need links to show how the article has been constructed. If you want to publicise your template lists, the correct place to do so is Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains.
The states in User:Renxu350/sandbox may look innocent at 13k bytes max. In fact they are server killers. They contain so many templates that they expand to crazily large files - I tried one: it took ages to load because it generated 880 kbytes of html and contained 700 images. Please stop creating these monsters.

— RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 19:46, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I am newbie for wikipedia, I don't understand what a namespace is, Is this something to do with internal/external link ? Do you mean I can not post edits which contains internal link? Namespace is database ? Please answer.

I still want to know if i can post edits which just contains internal link ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Renxu350 (talk • contribs)

Please sign talk page comments with ~~~~. Of course you can create internal links but they must be sensible ones! Have you read Wikipedia:Namespace? A namespace is not a database. It is a class of entries within the database. Can you not understand the basic difference between foo and User:Renxu350/foo?

What is the point of any of your icon lists when we already have User:AlisonW/Rail Icons1 and User:AlisonW/Rail grp1 through User:AlisonW/Rail grp14? These edits did not provide any information about the Nanjing Metro, merely about how the article was constructed. Do you see that they are not needed?

Before I unblock you, please state what you propose your next few edits will be. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 20:35, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

very pleased for your answering, have you got a msn messenger account? so you mean i can post any articles in the database User:Renxu350 ? but not in the article database ?

i will explain to you later for why i create that rail icon articles.

now it's Beijing time 5:00am, i gotta go to bed, and where are you ? what is the time difference between us ? could i talk to you later ? i need your help for unblocking me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Renxu350 (talk • contribs)

It occurs to me that by "internal link" you may actually mean "self referential". Nanjing Metro contains a link to Alstom. That is an internal link and of course perfectly OK. To the same article you added a link to User:AlisonW/Rail Icons. That was also an internal link but it was also self-referential, ie. referring to the way Wikipedia works. As such it was totally unnecessary.

Why on earth should I need a msn messenger account? Wikipedia matters are better discussed here. If it is more private, you can e-mail me via the link on the left of my user page - which is also where you could have found out where I am. Once you are unblocked, you will be able to post anywhere but I want to know what you propose to post so I can tell you the appropriate place. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 21:08, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Talk namespace is specifically there for self-referential discussions. If you had made these additions to Talk:Nanjing Metro, I would have left them untouched (even though we do not really need them). But I stress that I can see absolutely no reason why you needed to make copies of AlisonW's pages. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 02:44, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RHaworth, are you there ?

Now I'm explaining why i posted that Alison Wheeler Rail Icon articles. Actually the User:AlisonW/Rail Icons which I saw on my firefox internet explorer has two versions, the previous one did not shows the icons tables properly, the tables width is much wider than the firefox's horizontal scroll bar as i have to drag the scroll button left right right left every time to choose a icon for my article editing. The next version finally properly shows the tables. When I created Alison Wheeler Rail Icon articles in article namespace myself, I could get the proper display of the icons tables, this is the reason which i made copies of AlisonW's pages

dose that mean wikipedia article namespace only allow creating encyclopedical articles ? *1*

so I promise I will never create a page like the Alison Wheeler Rail Icon page,so please unblock me, thanks. Renxu350 (talk) 03:21, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In the absence of you deleting your copy page as previously requested (which has my name on though not mine) I have now deleted it. Please do not re-create it. If you need to refer to the BSicon table please use the original, thankyou. --AlisonW (talk) 12: 23, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Got The Point[edit]

I got the point, the way to solve the rail icon table width problem is to go to My preferences -> Skin -> MonoBook (default) (Preview) (Custom CSS) (Custom JS) - Renxu350 (talk) 21:30, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked[edit]

*1* Yes! At last you have got it.

By all means improve Alison's stuff: just make sure that it is on titles that start with user:Renxu350/ or user:AlisonW/ - if you have made improvements, offer them back to Alison. Happy editing. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 09:54, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cool For Unblocking![edit]

It's cool! Now I know that the way Wikipedia goes is pretty much different to HTML webs, blogs, 'private BBSs' or any others.

Got a question, what's the difference between Wikipedia:Some_Article and Some_Article? - Renxu350 (talk) 18:46, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you trying to say: what's the difference between Wikipedia:Some article and Some article? I thought you had at last got the idea of namespaces. Some article must describe something notable in the real world. Wikipedia:Some article is for self-referential discussion of Wikipedia content. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 19:41, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ok, I will see. - Renxu350 (talk) 19:45, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply For（why use external format for wikilinks?）[edit]

Reply For 20:31, 31 January 2009 RHaworth (Talk | contribs) (1,361 bytes) (why use external format for wikilinks?) (undo)

You cool! Yours is better. It's tricky, hehe. - Renxu350 (talk) 20:45, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RHaworth, Need Your Help![edit]

You probably blocked this IP adress 58.212.23.122, this is my current work place IP adresss, Need your help to unblock it.

And this is an ADSL Service, it automaticly changes to any other IP address every 48 hours. - Renxu350 (talk) 00:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

The user who this autoblock was intended for has already been unblocked - you're cleared to edit.

Request handled by: Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 04:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers man! - Renxu350 (talk) 04:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Change Login Name[edit]

Is that possible to change my login name from Renxu350 to RENXU350? Mr RHaworth, do you have the priviledge of doing that? - Renxu350 (talk) 07:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Renxu350. You have new messages at Mayalld's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mayalld (talk) 19:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Change Login Name[edit]

I do not, however you can make a request to have it changed here: WP:CHU. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 19:59, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BSicon-files[edit]

A table of replaced Icon-IDs is available at commons:Table of replaced BSicon-files. Antonsusi (talk) 08:29, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]